Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Poynt - I'm seriously alarmed if you think that your explanation here is definitive of anything at all.  Your own tests indicate a circuit that is uncomfortably close to inductance impact from the resistor itself.  Then there is the on going problem of an entire lack of data for us to establish the veracity of your claim - rather than yourself.  May I remind you of Wilby's call for presentation of data.  It requires the facts rather than a selective analysis of a situation.  Rather like reading a Judge's public summation of a case that had been held 'in camera'.  Not a good thing Poynt. 

And we are open source?  If there are questions that need answering then let's address those questions.  Why this undue haste to conclusion?  While it is acknowledged that various parties to this claim may be inclined to present the data that most appeals, there is NOTHING in Fuzzy's #5 that can be distorted.  The 2 minute videos show continuous results over each period of testing.  That cannot be 'fudged'.    And the only positive was evident during the early stages of the battery discharge?  Dare I say 'fluffy charge'?

So.  Poynt.  Lets get some data.  Hot off the press.  It should greatly enhance your argument here.  Else I think you'll fall victim to the very doubts about impartiality that you and MileHigh accuse us 'free energy' 'furry' 'fanatic' enthusiasts.   

[poynt99]

For anyone interested in the data, a link for both runs. Should make Glen happy anyway. 

The only difference between the two is an alteration in the grounding, otherwise the TRAA was equal in both at 7ºC, so both had the same actual PIL value.

The crunching has already been done for you.

http://www.easy-share.com/1908176317/Ainslie_2.5_3.7.zip

.99

[Rosemary Ainslie]

For anyone interested in the data, a link for both runs. Should make Glen happy anyway. 

The only difference between the two is an alteration in the grounding, otherwise the TRAA was equal in both at 7ºC, so both had the same actual PIL value.

The crunching has already been done for you.

http://www.easy-share.com/1908176317/Ainslie_2.5_3.7.zip


.99

First go - second go - message 'EASY SHARE msg_server+unavailable.  Third go.  Same message.  Can't you send this through Skype Pointy?  I sort of manage to open it there.  Would you mind?

And I think we all like to do our own crunching - but it'll be good to see your data.

And while I'm at it - how can you hope to claim replication when the very benefit appears to be related to the resistor's diameter that is somewhat wanting in your own resistor.  In short - why Poynt - are you trying to close this door?  With the utmost respect I detect undue and rather anxious haste.  I was really rather hoping for impartiality.

[poynt99]

Rose,

You ought to be checking your data and calculations at this point.

Can we see a post of your data with power values for Glen's data as I have?

I've done it for Glen's data and my own, now is that too much to ask?

.99

[fuzzytomcat]

http://www.energeticforum.com/71500-post2993.html