Claimed OU circuit of Rosemary Ainslie

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Guys, I've had the best laugh in ages.  So nice to see that this thread is back on topic. I think we drifted back there, for a bit.

Witsend.

[poynt99]

What I'm curious about Rose, is if the results I just posted are up to par, better, or worse than Fuzzy's #5 results?

.99

[Rosemary Ainslie]

What I'm curious about Rose, is if the results I just posted are up to par, better, or worse than Fuzzy's #5 results?

.99

Hi Poynty.  I don't actually think we can compare the two circuits without having approximate experimental apparatus.  But what your test shows is the need to check all waveforms and measurements to co-incide with your definition of POS.  You've honed in on the variables that allcanadian pointed to.  And we really need to check them all.  You're our best barometer of good measurement protocols - Poynty.  Most appreciated.  Not sure you've proved any excessive departures here - but they definitely need to be checked. 

[PaulLowrance]

If this was all based on Rosie theoretical work, where can one find all of the math?

Also, why not have Rosie mail her device to someone to be tested? Why have everyone in the world make something when the details are obviously lacking?

Maybe she'll allow someone out in Africa go out there to test it.


Regards,
Paul

[poynt99]

Hi Poynty.  I don't actually think we can compare the two circuits without having approximate experimental apparatus.

I'm not sure what you mean Rose. What am I missing? I thought we were in agreement that it was all about results. So what about the results are not up to par?

.99