Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[Osiakosia]

With yoke coil it was different approach. We resonated ferrite core in 3D for nuclear magnetic resonance. Then weird things happened, including ones what cause headache for few days (probably from ultrafafast mechanical ultrasound in gap betwen 2 yoke parts). Normally you need kilowatts to cause NMR but our approach was resonance with small input - in same way as N. Tesla did..

Ačiu už informacijÄ... .
Did you use any amplifiers to drive U-shape coil on yoke device . The sheme with SDK 392-10 ,that you had gave , works only
till 220 kHz . Then I tryed to drive U-shape coil directly from sweep generator , the signals on 15 turn coil and 50 turns coils
is to weak to precisely measure harmonics frequencies .
Regards

[gyulasun]

Hi Kaduci, thank you very much. I scanned my data and found it in one of my folders , it is in russian language and at the end there is a german abstract. I archived it in 2010. I can not find it in english or in german language. It was published in a german technical newpaper 1934. I doubt there exists a full translation. So if the time is right I will find someone who can translate this important piece of knowledge. It is my perception that these two gentlemen have been the only ones who have studied and published this techniques.

Regards

Kator01

Hi Folks, 

Here is a link to an English translation :

http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Reference_Material/Mandelstam_Papalexi/

Gyula

EDIT:  this is also useful from the same site:
http://www.tuks.nl/pdf/Reference_Material/Minorsky%20-%20Parametric%20Excitation%281950%29.pdf

[ronotte]

Hi gyulasun,

I did in the past experimentation on parametric amplification following the most significative available patents. All started with a successful replication of the basic JLN implementation as per:  [font=]http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/paramp31.htm. [/font]
[font=][/font]
I've to say that circuits built do work as described by patents (pat 3,125,725 Frequency converter -Chang, pat US20080185916 F Corum Power multiplication, Parametric conversion with varactors -Chan et all, etc). Mainly I used parallel of 4 varactors [font=](Sanyo SVC389) [/font] in order to change periodically their capacitance via an external oscillator hence pumping main tank resonation to 2x or 4x.

Most interesting has been my version of E.B. Gunn push-pull circuit that delivered something very near to a self runner.
True self-runner anyway has been proved impossible at least with my resources. The experimentation conducted with the help of Fred Epps.

Roberto

[wattsup]

@All

While I wait around for the manufacturer to respond to the TBC-110 build specs I will be trying a few new things.

Now that my flyback is slowly going down the tubes I will risk using the WNYg with a Tesla Ozone Patent addition. In the past I was trying the TOP in the usual 12 volts input to the TOP circuit using the WNYg SG1 at the end.

But with the WNYg device, trying to incorporate the TOP would have to be done using the WNYg HV Spark Gap 1 (SG1) as the TOP make/break switch but that means the required TOP High Inductance Coil (HIC) would have to be connected where the SG1 and the Caduceus Coil (CC) meet. But the problem is what type of HV coil to use in that position?

The main flyback is already producing a good dual dioded HV output and luckily both are then singled across the HV capacitor, so in essence the WNYg circuit is already very close to Tesla's TOP design with the SG1 (make/break), Cap and CC (working primary) already in place. All that's missing is the HIC.  (hic, hic)

While I was looking at them oldie EE videos that I had posted, they reminded me that all transformer coils can work with one as the primary and the other becomes the secondary, or the other way around. So why not use a second  Flyback Transformer (FBT) HV side as the HIC. It is already well conditioned for the HV environment and it will give the right amount of inductance and maybe even produce some output as well off the real primary and auxiliary secondaries to send back more to source. 

Maybe that's what TK was doing on the drive end using two FBTs in his Green Box. One to produce HV and one to induct a damped wave and energy return.
This would produce a TOP damped pulse WNYg device. It may be however that the HV of a FBT will offer excessively high inductance so some other transformer type may be required but I am convinced that as per the modification I show below (see Aux. Output), with the right capacity transformer, the device will output much more power with much less tuning required.

I will try it this weekend (hic, hic) but wanted to post this here in case something unexpected happens. My gut says this will produce an extremely interesting effect on the CC.

@T-1000

I have a question that has been puzzling me somewhat. Do you know if anyone has ever tried the WNYg device but instead of using two HV diodes at the HV+, you use four HV diodes placed in a full wave bridge rectifier (fwbt) method. It seems to me that if the HV+ is a sine wave, by only using two diodes this will kill half the HV output. Seems to me that in such cases a fwbt is a better choice of rectifying the HV+ to DC. Maybe that is why my flyback killed my power supplies because it produced to much reflection with only two diodes.

@ronotte

Look at these coils for the idea you had about the HV coil in several smaller winds.
http://www.jetcham.com.tw/High_Voltage_Transformers-4.html

wattsup

PS: Sorry for deviating but I am in waiting mode and am looking for out of the box methods to continue trying this set-up. lol

[jbignes5]

Now you are thinking.. It seems that transformers or even coils work in two modes at the same time and indeed reflection can happen. In fact if you get more in the out it will reflect back to the source and charge it. Since power supplies can not charge it destroys the power supply in this process. You are right in thinking you need to protect the source even further by adding the additional diodes but what if you are using batteries? Now the reflected power can be used to recharge the battery. I suspect the transformer action is a two way process if the conditions reverse it will transform a certain amount to tip the balance into a charging situation.


Thats why I stated that the use of bifilar input coils would help in the sense of power supplies that can not be charged. They take the input and invert a portion if it is reflected increasing the total out even further. This can be collected in a cap and routed back to the source in parallel, diode protection could be used as a fountain like analogy and keep the source clean. But then the source must be diode protected as well. So after all inputs are protected from feedback we have an aiding situation of the source unless you are using batteries(chargeable). This would lower the current even further from the source and might allow us to tip the scale into net output larger then input.


One thing no one has addressed is that we are attempting to pull in more energy from the environment. Well where is that interface then? The easiest way to do that is equal mass antennas that differ in surface area because this will cause an imbalance of the surface charges to increase the intensity between the two antennas or focusing effect. This imbalance will cause a flow and drag more energy into the device. The funny thing is the faster the frequency is the smaller the antennas needs to be! We need to couple to the environment and to now there is no way of doing this.


What I see in the Kapanadze motor is just that. One side of the disks is one potential and the other disk via the coil on the shaft is much higher. This creates a flow in one direction and pulls energy into the device that he eventually recycles. I can not guarantee this is the method but from the pictures this is what I am seeing. using big disks and coil allows for heavier current. Likewise using lighter disks and wire decrease current and increase voltage per the usual induction process.

If we do this with higher voltage it should be able to reach further and pull more energy then the high current methods. We just have to remember to use a transformer to bring down the voltage and increase current...