Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[ronotte]

@wattsup,
yes that is the standard way for winding a 2H coil fractioning it into 5 sections!!!
What I proposed was to wind spiral coils...only possible if you have a special winder...
Roberto

[gyulasun]

Hi Roberto,

Regarding the Chan or similar patents which use a negative resistance device either for oscillator and / or mixer (frequency convertion) I think they are 'normal' circuits, using the power supply or an outside battery energy for creating negative resistance parts in their voltage-current characteristic curve, if you disconnect input bias, the negative resistance disappears and the circuit stops.  In the past I used both tunnel diodes and the recent Lambda diodes for building oscillators for GDOs and I liked them for their simplicity (no need for feedback loop control like in case for a conventional wide band oscillator, need less components).
All in all I can only consider them as another active device like the bipolar transistor or JFET or MOSFET or an electric valve.

Regarding the Corum patents on power multiplication, I have not had the chance for building them, they seem to be very interesting circuits and probably these setups include the possibility for utilizing reactive power circling in the 'power' ring by a higher percentage than from 'normal' reactive circuits because the (load) isolation property for such ring arrangement is inherently higher. 
On the L.I.Mandeshtam and N.D.Papaleksi parametric circuit I think we have to 'digest' it first and then build it, I have only recently stumbled upon the English text I linked.

Thanks for showing your setup on the E. B. Gunn push pull circuit.  Would like to suggest your using ferrite pot cores instead of coils L1 and L2 to increase the quality factor of those coils.  I think your coils shown may have a unloaded Q (quality factor (X_L/r) r is mainly the DC resistance of your coil) of around 200 or so and with pot cores and maybe with Litz wire you can easily achive a Q of 300-400.  This way the circulating reactive power inside L1, L2 can be higher than it is now, especially if you used Ge diodes for the bridge instead of the Si diodes so that you could reduce the coupling of coil L3 with respect to L2, further increasing the (loaded) Q of L2, hence inreasing its inner reactive power.  And I assume your CMOS squarewave oscillator is similar to that of shown by Naudin, i.e. it has 50% duty cycle but I think a low duty cycle square wave would also work here?  meaning the usage of a CMOS 555 timer with its 2 diodes variable duty cycle circuit version so that the ON time hence the power consumption for this squarewave oscillator could be less (here I assume the varicap diodes need only the voltage amplitude to be present for their capacitance change, the frequency of the squarewave would not change with the lower duty cycle).  Try using low ESR type electrolytic capacitors at the output of the diode bridge or at least four normal 47uF caps in parallel to reduce their ESR.
Perhaps with these modifications the looping would be even closer to unity if you have already been close to it?

Thanks,  Gyula

[T-1000]

Regarding the Chan or similar patents which use a negative resistance device either for oscillator and / or mixer (frequency convertion) I think they are 'normal' circuits, using the power supply or an outside battery energy for creating negative resistance parts in their voltage-current characteristic curve, if you disconnect input bias, the negative resistance disappears and the circuit stops.  In the past I used both tunnel diodes and the recent Lambda diodes for building oscillators for GDOs and I liked them for their simplicity (no need for feedback loop control like in case for a conventional wide band oscillator, need less components).
All in all I can only consider them as another active device like the bipolar transistor or JFET or MOSFET or an electric valve.

The negative resistance/negativie capacity(happens on capacitor in its natural resonance) is your power kicking back after you fed it in. And it is primary target to handle properly for at least unity devices. Also the inertia/reactive power/BEMF/(you name it) is tricky for feeding it back into system because it has always collapsing magnetic field and different properties from electricity you usually use.  But this is #1 thing to get under control and usage before you go into OU device design.

Hopefully that clears some mud from the field...

[Сергей В.]

ПривеÑ, всем !!

Hi Stefan

I was registered as i have promised to you !!
How much people speak Russki on forum ??

Any news Tariel Kapanadze??

[Сергей В.]

DELETED, EXCEEDS MAX TEXT ALLOWANCE 65,000 Characters

Admin