Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[ronotte]

@wattsup,
I've analyzed the FOD3180 specs. This unit is well suited for driving a power mosfet switch as it use a 2A complementary output stage  (just like the IRF7307). The only penalization is the bandwidth and consistent pure delay introduced. Limiting the bandwidth to 250KHz (6N137's BW=100MHz) may not count much for your kind of application. Delay for itself is also not important as you are using an external generator. Finally: limiting the operation between low freq - up to about 100KHz should work, you will notice only some waveform deformations (asymmetry)...but you surely want to check with different duty cycle...
Thanks for informing on what's up on researchForum: after all there is still lot of smart guys still pondering SM's words
Roberto

[yfree]

@All


PJKBook has been updated.
Relevant part starts on page 3-107.

[woopy]

Hi Stivep

and all

Have tried to connect the antenna to the roof's water  channel of my farm (about 30 meters length of galvanised iron ) and it works very efficiently. Much much stronger than my 10 meter plastic insulated 10 meter original antenna.

Than i tried to use my flat kacher secondary winding (20 cm diameter )  as single antenna  and  it works also but differently.

Than i tried to insert my  home made variable cap , between the HV of the coil and the different antennas  and it semms to be very usefull. I can vary the frequency at will but always with different results depending of the load.

So i am ready to go on this experiment

but youp!!! very sensible this machine

thank's to all for sharing

and good luck at all

Laurent

[jbignes5]

We need to start looking at the electric field lines and how they actually work. Especially how two fields interact with each other and the flow they create.

I see this as when in unison they flow and get stronger but if they oppose each other they can absolutely oppose each other. The flows on the left are still flows! The acceleration of the flows is the determining factor in it's reflective abilities and the latter movement the lines provide. Remember these are 2d sectionals of a 3d field. The problem with these pictures is they don't show distance really well. The distance between each set of points would be vastly different.

Remember these fields are everywhere. The only difference is the density of those lines. Higher potential demand higher density of lines. Viewing ferrofluid is a good take of those lines and how they change the shape of the whole form. Watch the lines grow and they raise a spear out of nothing like a great elevator. I'll see if I can get the best example.

[wattsup]

@ronotte

I found this thread on using the opto.

http://4hv.org/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?30764.post

The question I have is should I simply use your original circuit diagram and just replace the IRF7307 with the IRF640/IRF9540 and run it like that.

The frequency limitation is not a problem since there is nothing happening off the flyback at higher frequencies anyways. Also on FG anything above 1MHz is always 50% duty. When the circuit blew, I am sure I was at 50% duty and forget to change it back to a lower setting. The best coolest running of your original circuit was when my FG was set to lowest duty and voltage settings with no apparent change in the spark. I had 12vdc on the circuit and 24vdc going through to the flyback primary.

wattsup