Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[Jon_sparky]

I´m new to this forum but like to offer some observations to all your great work:

Regarding a.king´s “Tesla skyscraper” experiment, resonance amplifies a certain effect and can also achieve super-conduction at HFHV when electrons begin to break free and flow outside the conductor. But the two are not the same.

Is it worth considering that TK´s illusive frequency is a Schumann harmonic?
If so, then a pulsed ringing of the bell would cause a larger reciprocal ring from the earth source?
If the circuit moves into resonance with the earth, also like clock pendulums moving into resonance together, the circuit need only ring louder to amplify the energy gain from the earth. Just an idea.

We notice the core itself and / or L2 coil also L3 are tied to the radiator earth (Current vector of right hand rule?).

Has any one also tried McFeey´s coil configuration with the suggested earthed copper ring?
There may be something to his Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, if we are talking about resonance at the nucleus where all things are possible it seems (antigravity +/- electron avalanche) but by transmutation of alloys?

From Don Smith voltage and current are split on the L2a+b, notice the load pickup on the ccw L2.
There may be a direct relationship between the earth tap and the load as driver. 
So then the spark gap acts as source current limiter, or because feedback causes an “infinity loop”, as a.king points out.  He also suggests L1 and L2 are tied together to the same earth so as to force resonance but the earth itself can be considered to be an open coil.

From the April 2004 video did anyone notice possible 3-plate cap? From Avramenko we learn that a circuit catching energy from a larger environmental source has to be blinded to get around BEMF.  So either there are perpendicular magnetic (NMR) or gravity fields (gravity-magnetic-electric triangle, bbem´s quote from xilo) or basic 3-plate earth cap effect.

TK himself said it is simple and if the circuit puts out “dirty DC” then I´d go for earth resonance.

[semenihin-77]

On the details marked with Tesla it works quite differently!
Quiet 100 watt bulb shines

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQ4vjz0aPvw

[x_name41]

Hey look is this, if this scheme is compared with a new aquarium we will see that blue coil and white output coil in this scheme should be identically except that one is non inductive!

[Zeitmaschine]

"TK did say it so simple you will laugh" - wow, i like this!

I like this too.

I am polluting threads, but take a look what I (re)discovered recently:

http://www.overunity.com/12487/simple-to-build-isolation-transformer-that-consumes-less-power-than-it-gives-out

This simple circuit takes power without affecting source which is the key to OU. It needs the pressure from source but source is not used. This circuit is always in resonance because there is no magnetic coupling to source, it needs only one frequency, no spark gaps, no diodes, no ground connection and no caps.

Hence let's play devil's advocate:

In 2004 video TK uses two transistors on heat sinks along with the DC voltage supply connected to a small transformer in order to create high voltage to run the spark gap with it. But neither the spark gap nor the helical coil nor the kitchen roll coil have any vital function in respect of power amplification. They are just remains of TK former experiments.

What stays left that could create electric over unity? Yes, it's the small transformer itself. 220V AC in (from inverter, not from grid, maybe this matters), unknown voltage out. If the primary is connected in a certain way with the secondary (this transformer has even two secondaries) then there could be resonance of some kind and over unity without the need of any high voltage or high frequency or a spark gap. This inconspicuous little transformer could be all that is needed to get the TK device up and running. All other parts are just there in order to obfuscate things (deliberately or not).

In the green box video the measurement of the output voltage was unsuccessful because »the field influences readings of the voltmeter«, according to translation of TK. Maybe there is a field created by the helical coil that »influences«, but this field does nothing, except preventing the measurements.

What could be the reason for the different look of the coil(s) in almost each setup? There is nearly the same coil in the tin can and the green box video. There are different coils in yellow tent presentation (huge ones, to make 100KW output credible), there are different (not so huge) coils in the blue coil setup, there is a different (very small) coil in hotel room presentation, there are different coils in both of the aquarium presentations. Is this because none of these coils is doing anything useful in respect of creating the output power? So it doesn't matter at all how they are wound, what core material is used and in which size they are?

Is this also the reason why in one presentation there is a high frequency spark (not even working at one time in the tin can video, see my Reply #12398), in another presentation there is a low frequency spark, in another presentation there is no spark at all? Because the spark does nothing that makes any sense concerning the function of the device? If a high frequency spark is needed like in the tin can video, then why is there a low frequency spark in aquarium II video? Is the high frequency spark hidden in the aquarium II box and only a false spark is presented? Why? What should be the gain in not showing the real high frequency spark as done before? Because there is no spark? And is this also the reason why the output power is very steady (no flickering lamps) although the behavior of a spark gap is always somewhat erratic?

Is this also the reason why TK can't make any money out of his patents (but rather out of secret presentations)? Because patent protection does not apply to private manufacturing and use of patented devices, but any John Doe who has the skills to connect a bell-ringing transformer can replicate the TK device once the secret is in public domain?

Anyway take a look at Tesla patents. Each screw and each wire is described clearly in writing and illustration. In both TK patents there are only black boxes with cryptic labels which no one understands. How can this ever be considered a valid patent?

The most significant part in TK's patent is the frequency generator.
IT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT COMPONENT.
He freaked out when he saw our frequency analysers. "You will know the frequency the device is based on" he screamed.
We are close -  very very close.

Maybe the device is based on 50Hz only - nothing else. That's why TK freaked out.

If energy can be shaken out of the surrounding space (ether) then - I always wondered myself - why this should only be possible at high frequencies and (very) high voltage? Why not 220V at 50Hz? Why should the ether care? Although here METHOD OF IMPLEMENTATION OF UNILATERAL INDUCTION is mentioned a high frequency of 299KHz it is not mentioned that this is the only frequency range that works. The method of »Unilateral Induction« should work regardless whether 500KHz or 50Hz are used and regardless whether a coil (or transformer) has an iron core or not.

So, what's next? Trash all high frequency/voltage circuits inclusive all self-wound coils and start some experiments with ordinary 50Hz transformers?

Yes, we are very very close - to the trash can.

Regards

[a.king21]

Zeitmachine, you think logically. I like that.
Here's what I think:
Kapandze's secret = transformer with 3 coils
Coil1 powered by function generator = RESONATOR
Coil2 in winding resonance with coil 1 = RESONATED
Coil3 Bifilar pickup coil in winding resonance. = CURRENT AMPLIFIER
Feedback Coil3 into Coil 1 = destruction of resonance  BUT:
Coil1 and 2 share a standing wave due to common ground on neutral side, therefore resonance is re-established.
Result = INFINITY LOOP
Then put a dummy load on infinity loop to prevent meltdown (ie sometimes a spark- gap)
ALL THAT IS IN IS PATENT- HAVE A  LOOK!! You just need to understand it.
That's why I think Jack Noskills is close.