Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[crowclaw]

@bass



PS: In the Aq2, we can see two transformers in the back section.

Take a closer look at the top of the left hand transformer in the photo... that appears to be a bridge rectifier with a central mounting bolt, has anybody else noticed?

[br549]

QUOTE: I want to try your setup. Can you mark exactly the placement of your scope probes? Thanks.

27bubba
I used a high voltage probe. It is connected to the wire going to the light bulb. You can also connect a 4 watt light bulb to the unused coil on transformer T1 and get the same effect. The transformers that I used (T1 and T2) are both the same. They have two 120 volt primary's  and one 12 secondary. I just connected T2 backwards.

[br549]

QUOTE form Black_Bird:
Probably what you are getting is true parametric amplification. The magnets "polarize" the core close to the knee of the magnetization curve. The high voltage pulse forces the core into the low permeability region of the curve ( saturation), changing the inductance of the transformer.

Black_Bird: Sounds reasonable:
1. Are you thinking that once the high voltage pulse occurs at the right point on the signwave, the core is
    pushed into saturation, and if another HV pulse occurs at the right point on the signwave, the core
    stays in saturation (as long as the signwave continues to pump it), but if another HV  pulse occurs at
    any other point on the signwave, the core drops out of saturation and the effect stops.   
2. In your opinion, is there a reasonably straightforward test to determine if this is what is occurring.

[jbignes5]

I highly doubt the core gets saturated when the HV hits it. HV doesn't have current so to speak. Plus the coil is really a current choke. It's sole purpose is to resist current. All the evidence is pointing to that effect. You could compare the coils effect on current to the flow in a pipe that constricts the flow. With the voltage equaling the speed of the fluid through the pipe which is increasing. The more turn of the wire in the coil the less current wants to flow and the more the voltage gets raised.


So if you are talking about transients causing the core to saturate I think that is a misnomer in this case.


I think in this case the magnet raises the cores ability to bounce back after a transient hits it. Like tightening the surface of a trampoline. The tighter the surface the higher it will rebound anything that hits it.


Here might be a better view of this:
  [size=78%]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atUTu8sg94w[/size]

[Vortex1]

Br549:

What I find interesting about your test setup is the rise in voltage for several cycles does not decay normally but seems to snap to the previous lower level (test #2 image, previous image shows normal decay). It also seems it is reset to the lower level when the pulse possibly hits out of phase with the peak positive, i.e. on the peak negative.

The questions that must be asked:

1) How much energy is transferred by the HV pulse?

2) Does it explain the  number of cycles of increase power to the lamp. (or is it an anomaly)

3) How close is the transformer / capacitor system to resonance? (line resonance or other)

4) Will a hit with just one HV pulse sustain the increase? If not then:

5) Can the HV pulses be gated e.g. with a timer/counter so that pulses only are allowed every "x" number of cycles of resonance, and always at the peak of the waveform rather than random or asynchronous. Conversely the HV pulse generator can be gate triggered only at the positive peak of resonance.