Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 70 Guests are viewing this topic.

wattsup

@Zeitmaschine

Interesting observation but where you say "no wire", that is because the primary is wound on a plastic former with side wall and your words "no wire" are on that plastic former. That is why you see no wires in the coil from that angle.

The transformer bolts hold down two Bakelite layers. One thick layer that is on the transformer core and another perforated layer that holds down the solder terminals. All that seems normal. From there you have two thin wires going into the coil indicating that the primary as we see it has thin wires wound so either the coil is a step down being used the right way, or it is a step up transformer used backwards. That is all normal.

@all

Yesterday I have been trying my solid state relays (SSR) without getting the pulse to go through to the TK coil and load. And, I finally realized that I overlooked one small technicality with these SSRs. The ones I have are AC output. I had put them on my set-up at the FWBR output which is DC. So both SSRs blew with a nice popping sound. Well what else in new. I totally forgot I was pumping DC through the SSRs. So I went to my EE store and could only find two more AC SSRs.

So I tried them without the FWBR, directly onto the AC secondary and both switched both sides of the AC line going to the TKc and to load, but there was nothing special with normal wattage consumption.  I used my FG on the input side and the switches work to around 500Hz and after that the lights go off.

I then decided to pulse again with the FWBR installed but using a standard DPDT relay as a mechanical switch again with my FG. The relay works pulsing both the + and - sides to the load but at very low 8-10 Hz. When I increase it to 60 Hz then I have to play with the pulse width to extend the closed time but then, the relay contacts start heavily arcing and just fizzed to hell and stopped. hehehe One more carcass.

So, I really need to find some DC Solid State Relays.

But if I am to switch DC with SSRs, I will still have the same fizzing problem as I had with the relay. So I found some document on DC SSRs attached below. In this doc they recommend the use of freewheeling diode(s) or a zener and a diode. This points directly to the use of those two heat sinked components (HSC) as being diodes and not transistors. So I confirmed also that diodes and zeners are available in the TO3 format with impressive specs to handle good wattage.

Where TK mentioned the energy is recirculated, this could be the method with freewheeling diodes. Again simple.  Besides, the HSCs cannot be transistors pulsing DC into the TKc/Load as I have never seen two of these handle so much power. at least 500 watts. You would have a bank of 5 of these to do that. The HSCs have to be diodes.

I think I am very close. Maybe a mechanical relay with freewheeling diodes will work as well. But it is very noisy. Hmmmmmm.

wattsup

TinselKoala


27Bubba

@wattsup

I asked this before and to my knowledge not one answered. What the abbreviation "FWBR " stands for?

Thanks.

TinselKoala

Quote from: FreeEnergyInfo on November 04, 2012, 06:05:05 AM
pdf...
http://yadi.sk/d/Cp2LbwD50YUdO

So now you are posting copyrighted material without even crediting the author or publisher?

The page posted as an image is Page 60 (ETA: Actually page 80, my glasses are dirty, sorry) from the Radio Shack publication called "Getting Started In Electronics" by Forrest M. Mims III
COPYRIGHT 1983 by Forrest Mims III, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
It's a book that contains a lot of information that some people seem to have missed, so it's great that you posted it. But please..... give credit where it is due. Mims and his books have been instrumental in teaching three generations of experimenters the basics of electronic circuitry.
You may also be interested in another of Mims's books, called  Engineer's Notebook: A Handbook of Integrated Circuit Applications (copyright 1979 by Radio Shack Corporation, all rights reserved.)

TinselKoala

Quote from: 27Bubba on November 04, 2012, 11:17:37 AM
@wattsup

I asked this before and to my knowledge not one answered. What the abbreviation "FWBR " stands for?

Thanks.

Full Wave Bridge Rectifier. Four diodes in a diamond configuration, with AC input and DC output.