Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[jbignes5]

 
So are you saying that the current static rules are merely a theory. That charges will not move if placed in a field? Doesn't that go against your agreement that potentials are why there is current? So what is current in your opinion or anything that you believe in as fact?

So what makes the single wire loop light the lightbulb in the experiment that I showed?

[Farmhand]

When Tesla says he gets HORSEPOWER from this, That would have to be Current, Right?  I mean without current you don't have much use with a large Electric Motor.  You need Current for the Horsepower to move the motor.  Those big motors back then probably used a lot of current... ??

Hi elementsix, Horsepower is simply another unit of power, 1 horsepower is about 750 Watts, this is power, which is the rate at which energy is applied or dissipated.
It is not necessarily the amount of energy. In my opinion, Tesla is definitely talking about a value of the oscillating power, not the output power.
I think in most cases when Tesla talks of a "rate of movement of electricity" he is talking about oscillating power or reactive power.
Not "output power" or dissipated energy. Tesla coils can accumulate a lot of oscillating power/energy but that is not output until it is dissipated in a useful load
as useful work, then it can be called output energy.

A 30 Kw motor is about a 40 HP motor. My car engine can produce 151 Kw of power which is about 203 Horse Power.

Current is not power, power is not necessarily energy and oscillating energy/power is not necessarily output or work done on a load.

Cheers

[elementSix]

Now there is a problem of all the question marks in that text file. What are they after the text of the original Tesla patent?

Sorry guys that TXT was converted because I can't post RTF rich text format, so I saved it as a TXT file and it got all fucked up.  Ill find the original hyperlink.  Give me a day..

[leo48]

Sorry guys that TXT was converted because I can't post RTF rich text format, so I saved it as a TXT file and it got all fucked up.  Ill find the original hyperlink.  Give me a day..

This is a pdf version

Leo48
   

[Hoppy]

So are you saying that the current static rules are merely a theory. That charges will not move if placed in a field? Doesn't that go against your agreement that potentials are why there is current? So what is current in your opinion or anything that you believe in as fact?

So what makes the single wire loop light the lightbulb in the experiment that I showed?

TK's 'green box' device demo showed a single wire supposedly connected to ground (although I believe as Wattsup showed, that this was an illusion and that it was actually connected to an external power supply). This wire was not returned to ground as far as I could see, so it appears that TK did not have a single wire loop. Also, if not grid powered, where was TK's source of energy for the excitation field, as represented by the signal generator in the demo you posted (other than the possibility of batteries hidden in a box)? I'm therefore saying that in TK's demo, I cannot see how a charge is 'sucked-up' out of the ground as you suggest, without a conductive loop and a source of energy for the excitation field. I'm not saying that I rule out this 'single loop' principle of operation for the TK device, just that the video evidence does not appear to support it.

Edit: I forgot to add that my experiments indicate that the light bulb is lit from the energy delivered by the signal generator. The bulb always lights much brighter when connected directly across the signal generator output. I have not seen this shown in any of the videos as a comparison with the single loop connection.