Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[verpies]

so I'm what a postively charged particle that sticks to the earth?  electrostatic attractive force != gravity.

At least you are thinking for yourself.
Try to enumerate all of the known differences between electrostatic and gravitational attraction, for the benefit of other users on this forum.

[d3x0r]

At least you are thinking for yourself.
Try to enumerate all of the known differences between electrostatic and gravitational attraction, for the benefit of other users on this forum.

I figured one would be enough, but to extend that one a little, then every other person is also positive, which would make shaking hands or hugging difficult.

[jbignes5]

I figured one would be enough, but to extend that one a little, then every other person is also positive, which would make shaking hands or hugging difficult.

No no no. The attractive force is on charges that are freely flowing around our globe. These charges when traveling by us and onward to our core or central point cause a gravity like effect upon everything around the globe and even outside of our global atmosphere. When that charges get to the core int they are converted into a magnetic flux by the material surrounding the core point. The charges, now transformed into a magnetic flux exit the core out through our poles and then recycle back into the earth via the atmosphere. There are steps I'm not showing as well like heat buildup in the core from the many charges flowing in the core area. Some of these are radiated from the core in other well know processes like convection. It's a very complicated process we are defining here.
So gravity is actually the force upon our own charges as the flow of free charges goes by us towards the core. Although we do have a charge value and charges in our matter they are encapsulated in little capacitors we like to call cells.
In the earth, if we understand the static laws and apply them we understand that the charges are drawn away from the surface of the earth and back down in the mid section of the globe. Now some do get away and that's the natural heat we see radiating away from the earth.


Lets look at the Tesla experiment of an elevated conductor above our planet and you will see that the elevated conductor is one plate of a capacitor and the other is the ground surface. The further these plates are the higher the voltage potential across that crude capacitor. We all know there is an electric field around our planet and this fact creates a flow direction. Since the earths crust is charge deficient it has a vacuum associated with it. This causes a flow direction from the elevated conductor towards the earths plate when it is referenced to the grounds plate and it will cause a good amount of charges to bypass the normal avenue of flow directly to the earths crust plate.

If you study surface magma flows you would know there. Is a static charges on the surface of the flow. This is because it is flowing and rubbing against other particles of the magma. I'll see if I can get a reference video for this statement.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=oMC-cU0Wtf4


And yes there is a chance that you will get a static shock if you are not of equal charge to others around you. But that's another topic.

[d3x0r]

No no no. The attractive force is on charges that are freely flowing around our globe. These charges when traveling by us and onward to our core or central point cause a gravity like effect upon everything around the globe and even outside of our global atmosphere. When that charges get to the core int they are converted into a magnetic flux by the material surrounding the core point. The charges, now transformed into a magnetic flux exit the core out through our poles and then recycle back into the earth via the atmosphere. There are steps I'm not showing as well like heat buildup in the core from the many charges flowing in the core area. Some of these are radiated from the core in other well know processes like convection. It's a very complicated process we are defining here.
So gravity is actually the force upon our own charges as the flow of free charges goes by us towards the core. Although we do have a charge value and charges in our matter they are encapsulated in little capacitors we like to call cells.
In the earth, if we understand the static laws and apply them we understand that the charges are drawn away from the surface of the earth and back down in the mid section of the globe. Now some do get away and that's the natural heat we see radiating away from the earth.


Lets look at the Tesla experiment of an elevated conductor above our planet and you will see that the elevated conductor is one plate of a capacitor and the other is the ground surface. The further these plates are the higher the voltage potential across that crude capacitor. We all know there is an electric field around our planet and this fact creates a flow direction. Since the earths crust is charge deficient it has a vacuum associated with it. This causes a flow direction from the elevated conductor towards the earths plate when it is referenced to the grounds plate and it will cause a good amount of charges to bypass the normal avenue of flow directly to the earths crust plate.

[size=78%]

[/size]



Ya, unfortunately I don't really subscribe to the electric universe theory; electrostatic charge is so much weaker than magnetism.  But then I think the earth's core moves because of the magnetic field it's in, not that the field exists because of a dynamo motion.


Primer Fields.  Though; this doesn't account for why the fields are there in the first place on a large scale.  He's got an interesting model, but it's lacking also.  When voyager 1 and 2 left the heliosphere they encountered even larger magnetic fields.  Acutually this clip accounts for both opposing and attractive forces on the [size=78%]planets/sun.  [/size]

[jbignes5]

[/size]



Ya, unfortunately I don't really subscribe to the electric universe theory; electrostatic charge is so much weaker than magnetism.  But then I think the earth's core moves because of the magnetic field it's in, not that the field exists because of a dynamo motion.


Primer Fields.  Though; this doesn't account for why the fields are there in the first place on a large scale.  He's got an interesting model, but it's lacking also.  When voyager 1 and 2 left the heliosphere they encountered even larger magnetic fields.  Acutually this clip accounts for both opposing and attractive forces on the [size=78%]planets/sun.  [/size]

So obviously you don't agree with the fact that a magnetic field has two components? You can not have a magnetic field without an electric one. So explain to me the relationship with Pluto to our suns magnetic component. Let me check the distance of Pluto to our sun again and tell me how a magnetic field could possibly extend all the way to Pluto... It is indeed an electric Universe. Even plasma is created from an electric field. Yes it responds to the magnetic but the genesis of the plasma is a high voltage field. If that wasn't the case then you could make a plasma from only a magnetic field which you can not. It must have a high voltage field to work. like I said before the magnetic field is a by product of the electric field.


Tesla figured this out and was using the electric field to do all of his experiments, well all after creating our very lossy AC system. Tesla was even on record as saying that he made a mistake inventing the AC system. This was due to the experiments of high voltage/high frequency impulses.