Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[Qwert]

Interesting! The »Principle of system« looks almost like my drawing here on page 1292.

Now we just have to add the Free-Energy-Factor to this.

Right. My wider suggestion is to google or otherwise browse the net and use one's own reasoning, since it's (the net) also full of fraudsters. For example, later yet I found this:
http://ptp.irb.hr/upload/mape/kuca/07_Dmitry_S_Strebkov_SINGLE-WIRE_ELECTRIC_POWER_SYSTEM_FOR_RE.pdf

so I better stop suggesting; DIY.

[stivep]

Drawings from Townsend Brown's 1928 public
domain British patent illustrating a multiplate idea
and a general cylindrical configuration.





NASA Marshall Space Flight Center
Barrel-Shaped Asymmetrical Capacitor


http://www.gravitecinc.com/PDFs/Cambell%2020040171466_2004178290.pdf


really puzzles me


Wesley

[dllabarre]

.

[Zeitmaschine]

Easy, stick a solar panel and inverter on the front-end. 

Solar panel of the new generation. Receives not the visible light from the Sun but the Sun's invisible electric field.

Actually I do not fully (if at all) understand the interaction between a high voltage source and the ground. The ground has a lot of free electrons. OK. A high voltage DC source (e.g. a charged capacitor) has a positive side and a negative side. OK. The negative side has a surplus of electrons and the positive side has a lack of electrons. OK. Connecting the positive side (plate) of the high voltage source to ground attracts therefore the electrons from ground, hence a current of electrons flows from ground into the positive side of the high voltage source and neutralizes it (discharges it, fills up the positive side with electrons until it is equal the negative side). But doesn't that mean that the electrons coming from ground now are all trapped in that (former) high voltage source? Because after the flow of electrons into that high voltage source the high voltage source stops being a high voltage source, so the electrons have no reason to flow back into the ground?

I think we should reconsider our conception of electric current, shouldn't we? Something must be fundamentally wrong with that conception, otherwise the page number here wouldn't be that high.

[Qwert]

Zeitmaschine, you are great! I read, re-read this topic, and it does not fit to my (popular science) knowledge. Only now, everything is clear: it is just a conception of some charismatic brainiacs!!