Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 148 Guests are viewing this topic.

TinselKoala

Yes, it does matter "how old" your equipment is, because more modern versions have higher bandwidth, more precision and better accuracy. A NIST-traceable calibration only means that the instrument is within its specified performance parameters, not that it is absolutely accurate or even as accurate as a later model instrument.

Compare, for example, the 300 kHz C-H 255 with the more modern (but still obsolete)  1MHz C-H  2335. Which do you think will be more accurate on a signal with possible high-frequency components, even when both have NIST-traceable calibrations and are performing within spec?

Here are your manual and schematics. Note the frequency range and the percentage accuracy values, as well as the instructions and cautions for making measurements.


https://blueprint.keshefoundation.org/manual.php

stivep

Quote from: TinselKoala on February 08, 2016, 08:17:34 PM
Yes, it does matter "how old" your equipment is, because more modern versions have higher bandwidth, more precision and better accuracy. A NIST-traceable calibration only means that the instrument is within its specified performance parameters, not that it is absolutely accurate or even as accurate as a later model instrument.



That is true  however USA holds itself on money using  equipment  required to make measurement.
It will not pass a test and It will not be approved, And I t will not count if you use other methods or instrumentation   not listed  for that particular task.
Military will only buy what pass their requirement.
So at the end they do not need more accuracy, more precision...
They do not care,
That is why VNA of HP that is 20 years old  is more expensive  than new never used chinese,  or any other  asian junk excluding Japan( approved only)
The rest of that garbage is  for simple crowd to play.
Is it better?
Might be........
Nobody Gives a Damn











Quote from: TinselKoala on February 08, 2016, 08:17:34 PM
Compare, for example, the 300 kHz C-H 255 with the more modern (but still obsolete)  1MHz C-H  2335. Which do you think will be more accurate on a signal with possible high-frequency components, even when both have NIST-traceable calibrations and are performing within spec?

Here are your manual and schematics. Note the frequency range and the percentage accuracy values, as well as the instructions and cautions for making measurements.


https://blueprint.keshefoundation.org/manual.php
Here you  100% right.
However   if simpler  version  can be used it pass the scrutiny of the Bureau.
That is why American  fly to space on traditionally  checked technology.


The best way to tell if someone's a dipshit is if they use any form of Russian  technology , checked  according to Russian  standards.
Do they have something good?
Yes they have  Brains............... then loooooooong nothing than ............ deep shit.............
$1= 78.41 ruble
And russian  average  salary is $173 per month


Only my personal  opinion


Wesley


PS: Man You have got  a beauty  there, 3 independent measurements  at the same time.
HOT... uh................ Hot............
I love it.
I was not so lucky  like you my friend
Clarke Hess  is a standard  on its own.








stivep

Quote from: Void on February 08, 2016, 08:13:20 PM
Hi Wesley. It's nice to see someone putting a magrav unit through some proper power measurement testing.
That Swedish guy appears to have no idea what he is doing, as I couldn't make heads or tails out of his video. :)

Apparently some of the early magrav units that were shipped were recalled due to there supposedly being some sort
of manufacturing flaw in them, although I don't know what the specific reason was that they were recalled.

I don't have a copy of the magrav user manual, but I took screen shots from a Keshe video which shows the magrav
conditioning step by step procedure taken from the user manual (from a Keshe video from a few months ago).
The screen shot images in the attached PDF file have overlap in them from screen shot to screen shot, as you will notice.
There are 6 steps listed, as well as some notes. For every step, they stated that if you don't follow that step exactly
you will void the warranty. If you have a used magrav unit, if the proper conditioning procedure was not followed the
implication is that the unit may well not work, but it really seems that they were just making excuses. Keshe's comments on
the conditioning procedure seemed to change from video to video, and even Keshe's own followers seemed very confused
by Keshe's vague and constantly changing statements from video to video. Maybe you can get someone to send you the
magrav user manual, if someone has a copy of it.

I wouldn't worry about telling about what's inside the magrav unit, as all the details were already released in Keshe's videos and
on his website for quite a while now. It is just some specially corroded copper wire formed into various coils that are configured a certain
way. Keshe calls this corrosion procedure/treatment of the copper wire 'nano-coating', and claims it has very special properties.

P.S. See below. TK posted a link to the current Magrav user manual.
The conditioning is only time  Keshe wanted to buy
He was in need of the time to cash as much money as he could.
He new that he needs to sale  X number of devices and Safely run away.
He new that whatever is the truth he made to wide statements and even for that he might be arrested.
Only the money paid for his seminar or attendance  is enough to launch a case
Wesley

Void

Quote from: stivep on February 08, 2016, 09:18:12 PM
The conditioning is only time  Keshe wanted to buy
He was in need of the time to cash as much money as he could.
He new that he needs to sale  X number of devices and Safely run away.
He new that whatever is the truth he made to wide statements and even for that he might be arrested.
Only the money paid for his seminar or attendance  is enough to launch a case
Wesley

Hi Wesley. I suppose Keshe could just be a common scammer, but my impression is that he
may well be suffering from a serious delusional disorder. He declared himself in one of his videos to be
the messiah. He has put out many, many hours of videos, but to my knowledge he has not ever demonstrated
one single prototype of his claimed 'new plasma' technologies that does anything at all out of the ordinary.
As far as I know Keshe has not even demonstrated a working Magrav unit producing over unity, even though he is
selling them on his website, unless something has changed in this regard very recently. From what I have seen so far,
it is not looking very good at all for Keshe's 'new plasma technology'. :)




TinselKoala

Wesley... aren't you worried that your instruments may get all "nano-coated" inside from being connected to the Keshe device? I think this will probably void your warranties and make your calibrations questionable ....     ;)


(Also... could you please resize your images so that they are no more than 1024 pixels wide. If you need to show a closeup in greater magnification, you can crop out the area of interest and blow it up, but the images wider than 1024 pixels cause problems for people with narrow screens.... )