Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 60 Guests are viewing this topic.

stivep

Dear Meta toroid as model of atom is for me new.
I have seen video that was proposing  such model.
The problem is that this model is not universally accepted nor recognized.


We do not even know if our universal models are correct.
But we build all science based  on those models.


So for me trying to fallow that new approach  is like trying to find exit from the  jungle.
That model only proposes answer to some basic questions and the rest of the answer must be derived  from that model .
Mr Bearden never did so nor is willing to do so
e.g.
PET is used in  medicine and is based on positron and orbital electron collision.
in the  well respected science it is no problem for me to build  the device the software and see 180 degrees of photon radiation in opposite vectors.
that in turn gives me picture of the specimen body or brain  of the patient in PET tomography or any  other radioactive sample topography.


Once I 'm looking for FE. I do not want to waste my time to derive all of  missing blocks of logics based on new and proposed model.
I decided to make  assumption that electrostatic difference of potential is common to  Tariel Kapanadze and all other  people mentioned in my previous article.
So if that is given than  that must remain for the rest of conclusions.(tests, experiments)
The possibly  invalid analogy to perpetual motion of an electron that never stop moving does not matter,
however it is something that does go on and on and on.
If then on the big scale Electrostatic Field at High Voltage  is mimicking  perpetual motion of that  electron.
By simple observation we could say that we  have now several people  who stated that they  have build the device FE. and all of them   uses HV.


If you want to help me Mr. Meta as  much more involved in new model please point to me another "constant" phenomena that you have seen in all "working"FE
apart from  HV electrostatic potential.?
If you just point at other historical facts  I would be left in the middle of the  ocean  with one piece of wood supporting me from falling down to the depth of all of that shit around that does not care about future of humanity at all.
Talk to me  like to the child.
If your unknown to me models brings you something    constructive I'm ready to see it.
But I'm unable to swim  in your waters.


Wesley

 






Meta

Westley,

Very well if you  want to keep thinking as you did, enjoy failing again.

However if you remember what  Gerard Morin said you may exit your problem that some of you have, with AC current....someone asked about its validity....Gerard said "Its not AC current that drives the motors, its actually HF (high frequency)". And with HF he uses HV (high voltage). The higher the voltage the better.

Also remember, as a model, I recommend again, Gerard Morin and his generator/load set up. He includes 2 transformers (pole line transformer cans). You can include your own step up and step down transformers and it must be 2 of them.

Remember what he did.....he stepped up low voltage to high voltage out thru the horn, in 1 transformer then ran the high voltage wire to the high voltage horn on the number 2 transformer, so moving out of This Side (3D) to the Other Side (4D) where all the HF and HV are, then he steps that down to low voltage in the number 2 transformer thus he amplifies, not multiplies his potential.

In your circuits you are still in 3D dealing with current and what is falsly called AC...make another step down circuit that is a 2D rotation of the 1 circuit you have.

2D rotation explained:

Take the letter L rotate it upside down....this is 1 D roation.
Now take the upside down L and flip it left to right....this is a 2D rotation so the L is now upside down and backward.....this is the function of the transformer 2 or circuit 2. Now you will have a 2 sided, step up/step down circuit or machine which accesses the 4th dimension where the HF and HV are. The invisible, virtual 4th dimension is upside down and backward to the visible 3D. Now you can deal with HF, HV and no more AC or current.

Meta

This may help to know....

Space is the "perfect" non-medium.

In the Jan 2002 issue of Scientific American, pg 21 it says,

"It is as if empty space behaves like a vast piece
of superconducting metal".

Meta

Correction:

Error: Gerard said "Its not AC current that drives the motors, its actually HF (high frequency)".

Correction: Gerard said "Its not AC current that drives the motors, its actually RF (radio frequency)".