Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[FatBird]

WattsUp,  Can you please post some information so we can duplicate what you are doing?

Thanks.

[baroutologos]

@ Wattup,

I do not know if you hit a hot spot or not, but according my view (as repeatedly expressed) energy should come from somewhere.
An isolated, standing box system, is far less likely to show any OU merit than a grounded or an aerial antenna system.

In my eyes, you need to plug your device to the nature.
Secondly, it is less expected the nature to provide in electrical terms the energy that it is theorized to exist in DC rather in oscillating currents.
SO frequency enters the picture here. What frequency exactly is the next question then?

Now, the need to "Scan" earth's frequencies becomes imperative...

[iceweller]

At this point, we have to define a basic setup which everyone can use to scan this frequency or frequencies in order to have a basic point of reference. A basic circuit, possibly with a 555 signal generator which drives a push-pull and an accepted coil setup with ferrite core. The ground/earth reference or "plug" is a must, as we all should know by now. An ordinary filament lamp may be connected to the output or a scope (more sensitive).

Attached is a shot of the schematic shown by tiger2007 and below are links to the footages fyi - unfortunately I have no translation:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbthvNiOpL0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GePFRnaan00
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=spHgKf_Bx6A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-1fcXR5Qj9Q

Additionally, this is another setup by a Bulgarian guy named "coke2k" worth investigating (barouto you know this already too):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a0LilR-bWV0

[exnihiloest]

there is no way you could possibly know what ideas i have...

It was just a attempt to guess the reason of your not relevant objection.

you're moving your goalposts now... you didn't state anything about magnitudes nor percentages in your first blanket statement. you said it was "useless" for two reason and gave no further qualification. as an aside, i would be curious to see your data on wireless power transfer being done on a large scale. ie: grid scale.

I have realised many HF amplifiers for radio purposes, whose successive stages were coupled at a (short) distance by LC circuits, not directly connected. It works. But as soon as the circuits have been moved away, only a small part of the power of a stage can be recovered by the next one, even though the circuits are perfectly tuned.
There is also no commercial products for powering at a distance, expect recent attempts for charging devices, using magnetic field between tuned loops. Nevertheless they were very near from one another (on the order of 1 meter) and with low efficiency (<60%). Magnetic field was prefered to electric field, because it is much less sensitive to the effects of the surrounding.

In fact, you are reversing the burden of proof. If you assert that you can transmit energy with efficiency at long distance by electrically coupled circuits, you should show us the experimental evidence.

[baroutologos]

@exnihili,

If you study Tesla, you will understand that the man always wanted to substitute the AC current transmiting infrastructure with natural media. One wire electricity that HF currents offer fit for the job.

One of his first patents (the one you indicated) for that purpose, conceptualized the use of HV potential of his oscillators for ionizing the thick air till the conductive ionosfere and then the circuits to communicate with each other. For that purpose he suggested the transmiting/receiving towers to be located at elevated places as high as 4Km or more for breaking the air till ionosfere with ease.

Of course this plan, no matter how smart was considerably difficult to attain and "useless" in a sense. Tesla did not give up. He knew that his oscillators in their course charging/discharging their top-capacity produce an alternating current in and out of the earth.  (like a pump in the surface of a lake)
In colorado springs he had one oscillator (of considerable power thought 50Kw +) to work firmly grounded and another as far as a mile away to be able to light bulbs. Obviously the coumpling between them could not be inductive since the distance prohibits it, neither capacitative.
The ground was energized, and connecting the receiving oscillator, it simply draw power from source.

Again this procedure had its losses. Tesla observed in July 1899 (and still officially unconfirmed) that instead of imposing a random electrical oscillation to the ground that diminished with distance, the earth "supports" certain frequencies that put the whole earth in a resonant mode and letting the power injected unaffected. Tesla argued (Tesla said) in an article that he managed to enforce an electrical oscillation to the whole planet and maintaining it with as little at 5-10 HP expences as long as any receiver was not at work.

...

My view is that Tesla, never described any experiment with inaccuracy or lie. Perhaps he has said a lot of theoretics and potential things science could perform, but upon describing his work was very punctual.
IMO, still that to be the case, the power transmiting through earth is of no value since anyone could intercept it (in sea or land anywhere on globe) and exploit it without paying or unsensibly.

ps: I have described the above concept  more than once and i ask to be escused. It must be noted Tesla never said in that setup anything about OU. He aknowledged on the contrary that those systems include losses but by keeping resonce at low frequencies the EM antenna "Hertzian" losses are restricted and effciency of transmitting source and receivers could be as high as 97% (Tesla said).