Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[wattsup]

@nievesoliveras

Thanks for those two images you posted but maybe it is better for you to open a new thread with SR193 in the title so it can start from there.

If you always, always and always keep in mind that the bulb is grounded to Earth from one end (negative) and the device is simply providing the positive potential, that should by itself cancel out many operational theories.

@stefan

Regarding your putting the Nowak member on read mode or whatever, please note that it was another member here that called him a Nazi and he was only stating out of only sarcasm to that reference of Jews. I think you are not understanding in many cases the real meaning of the conversations and you have jumped to fast to ban him.

[LtBolo]

Would you mind explain more thoroughly? With formulas etc.

It isn't complicated in theory, although in practice may be a bit harder.

The energy stored in a capacitor is: energy = 0.5*C*V²
The charge in a capacitor is: Q = C*V
The capacitance of two capacitors in parallel is: C_total = C₁ + C₂

Let's say I have two caps, C₁ which is 200uF and C₂ which is 200nF, connected to each other separated by a switch. I charge C₁ to 100 volts. C₁ now contains 1 Joule of energy and 0.02 coulombs of charge per the formulas above. When I discharge C₁ into C₂ by throwing a switch, I have placed the two caps in parallel, and the total capacitance of the pair is now 200.2uF. When 0.02 Coulombs are stored in 200.2uF, the resulting voltage is 99.9 volts. C₁ now contains 0.998 joules and C₂ contains 0.001 joules. The total energy between the two caps is 0.999 joules and 0.001 joules is missing. Nothing interesting so far.

At the point of discharge, C₂ and the wire between it and C₁ form an LC circuit. Even a short length of wire will have a microhenry or so, and at the discharge frequency, that becomes a significant amount. The LC will ring at some frequency...in the case of 1uH and 200nF, it will ring at 355881Hz...give or take a bit. Again, nothing interesting.

The interesting part, is that in the initial discharge, the voltage on C₂ will surge to nearly double the voltage on C₁, meaning that C₁ has given up nearly 0.004 joules, even though C₂ is only capable of storing 0.001 joule at that voltage. During the subsequent ring out, 0.002 joules will get returned to C₁, C₂ will retain 0.001 joule, and 0.001 joule will be lost to heat and radiated energy. Stick a diode between C₁ and C₂ and you can get a big chunk of that 0.004 joules to stay in C₂. I discharged a 120uF cap at 60V into another 120uF cap with a fast diode between the two, and ended up with 20V in C₁ and 40V in C₂, or 4x the energy in C₂ as in C₁. Now while interesting, none of that is particularly useful in that form.

In this capacitor experiment, we are using two capacities at relative charges...much like two pressure vessels at pressures relative to ambient. But what is absolute charge? We understand absolute pressure...atmospheric pressure at sea level and standard temperature is a well defined quantity. But again, what is absolute charge? If we believe that the earth is at a charge greater than absolute zero...and I'm 99% sure that it is...then can we create a pocket of absolute charge that is less than that of the earth? And if so, will the earth discharge into that capacity in the same manner that C₁ discharges into C₂?

The capacitor experiment simply proves that given an electrostatic gradient between a large capacity and a small capacity, the large capacity will give up to 4x the energy that the small capacity can store, even if for just a moment. That suggests that it may be possible to spend 1 unit of energy to coax the earth to give you 4 units of energy...which sounds curiously like the gearing or levering that Kapanadze described. Of course this all sounds far too easy and not nearly complicated enough...no aether, no quantum, no vortex...boring. But ironically, simple might actually work.

The more I study this, the more convinced I am that a simple Tesla coil in the proper setup, might actually be resonating at 4x the level it should be for the amount of excitation given. The design challenge is in harnessing that resonance without killing it or altering the resonant frequency of it, not the simplest thing given the notoriously fickle nature of tuned systems.

Sorry that I really cannot provide more at this time...I'm still working it out myself. I am a big fan of having a theory and proving aspects of it in the lab. This is the first time that I have personally found something that might be exploitable and explainable with conventional science...so I'll definitely keep digging.

[wattsup]

@nievesoliveras

Here is an image that may help for the SR193 device.

See there is a reed switch under the on/off switches.
That is how he controls the on/off of the device with low voltage coil and switches activating a higher current reed switch.

wattsup

[nievesoliveras]

Thank you @wattsup!

There are now two pieces less to look for.
1. The light always is grounded
2. There is a reed switch under the on/off switches

Jesus

[iceweller]

@nievesoliveras

Here is an image that may help for the SR193 device.

See there is a reed switch under the on/off switches.
That is how he controls the on/off of the device with low voltage coil and switches activating a higher current reed switch.

wattsup

  That's not a reed switch (what made you think this?), it's a blue polyester or ceramic unpolarised cap beside an electrolythic one (the silver one coming out from the small pcb). The circuit is a driver circuit for the 50Hz "oscillator" coil which drives the 2 power transistor bases. I see no reed switch anywhere in that setup, just a relay. See the attached pics. I attached a schematic made by MADSAT which is probably the most accurate even if it not 100% correct (the start and stop switches drive the relay which is not completely indicated in the schematic for ex. but it's not a major issue for the functionality but some component values may not be correct).

   If you translate the russian forums there is a lot of information for ex. realstrannik's:

http://realstrannik.ru/forum-strannikov.html?func=view&catid=19&id=102

   There are a lot of links to experiments (for ex. RX/TX coil setup).