Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[LtBolo]

It is my understanding, Ltbolo, that either an obvious two plate common capacitor or earth and an elevated globe, its the same. They both form a two plate capacitor, no matter how small the capacity is or bizzare their outline is.

Right, from a static perspective, I agree...two charges separated by a dielectric is a capacitor, regardless of what shape it is in. I also agree that it is possible to create a capacitor using what you describe.

So what do we call a single piece of wire where all of the free electrons are crammed into one end because an electric field pushed them there? There is no dielectric, and once the field is removed, the charge is only separated by the time it will take for it to get from one end to the other.

I am not trying to describe a capacitor, I am trying to describe the electric equivalent of cavitation. I'm then offering the thought that if the inrush behavior of cap discharging to cap is anything like the inrush behavior of the earth into an absolute potential that is well below the earth's absolute potential, that the magic of many of these devices may simply be that for every unit of absolute charge vacuum we can create, the earth will send us 4 units for a brief moment.

[LtBolo]

deleted

[ramset]

LtBolo
Quote,
I am not trying to describe a capacitor, I am trying to describe the electric equivalent of cavitation. I'm then offering the thought that if the inrush behavior of cap discharging to cap is anything like the inrush behavior of the earth into an absolute potential that is well below the earth's absolute potential, that the magic of many of these devices may simply be that for every unit of absolute charge vacuum we can create, the earth will send us 4 units for a brief moment.
--------------------------------------------------
Sorry to interupt, But I must say Thank you !
Wonderful concept !

Chet

[iceweller]

As it was referenced in a post before, for those interested I uploaded the scanned Nexus magazine article on Tesla's Pierce Arrow car by Igor Spajic:

http://rapidshare.com/files/438457883/TeslasPierceArrow_s.pdf

Here is a very good article by prof. Andrè Waser about Tesla's Primary and Secondary solar rays and his bulb experiments:

http://rapidshare.com/files/438458482/TeslasRadiationsAndCosmicRays.pdf

[wattsup]

OK, here are some questions regarding the core of the transformer.

SG193 says it is a ferromagnetic core. Looking at his build from the side view of the transformer we can see the center opening is too wide for there to be real ceramic magnets since I have never seen magnets with that diameter and that size center hole, but indeed just the right diameter and opening for ferrites. I know all this has been said before but I just had to confirm it for myself before I move forward on this. So he is using X number of ferrite cores placed one next to the other but the problem remains as to how these ferrites play in the overall scheme of the device.

1) Are they enamel coated ferrites?
2) Are the ferrites placed skin to skin or do they have a thin spacer between them.

But the most important question is what effect will these have when you take a ferrite that you usually wind a coil in the traditional sense and instead wind a coil along the rim of the ferrite. You would have about 2-3 turns per ferrite.

What is the effect of many ferrites in such a winding and can they convey anything between them by simply being placed one next to the other? Or are they each considered as isolated events that are grouped together by the first coil winding?

Also, these ferrites have wires wound over them that have thick enough outer coating so what is the effect of this when we usually use magwire. Some also say the ferrites are placed inside  PVC pipe with coils wound over the pipe but this will create a rather wide gap between the actual wire, the wire coating and the PVC pipe thickness.

Then the ferrites are completely covered with the first coil layer. Then you have two other half length coils wound two and three layers up each or whatever way I don't really know yet for sure, sure.

But the effect of all that coiling on these multi-ferrites that are hit from the edge of the ferrites must create one hell of mess if you looked at it on a scope. Major flux havoc. And then to find the positive potential required to light that side of the bulbs. Man this is crazy stuff indeed and I am certain that this is the main thing to understand here. The rest of the device is pretty basic step-up, spark gap basics, but the transformer is giving me a mental juggernaut just thinking about all the forces that would be in play here.

Is it possible that the ferrites being hit from the outer edge receive each impulse but the directionality of this makes it react like small explosions as they hit the center rim or where the impulse hits the edge, moves towards the smaller inner edge and bounces back and forth from there in all directions inside the core. Making what, I don't know but this part of the build is something I would like to investigate with different variations to see some effects.

I am not really interested in trying to replicate TK's or SR's device since it will always be a best guess scenario and I have had loads of those. I think the transformer study is the best way I can spend some time on this and report back results. Those results could then be used in other types of builds, maybe even more compact and with no spark gap, who knows. Maybe TK only discovered one way to use the core and there may be more and even better ways. lol