Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[quarktoo]

   "The problem of increasing Human Energy" which is a very extensive and interesting read - this is what you are referring to. It appears you are mixing the analogy with the Linde process and his burning atmospheric Nitrogen creating a "12 million volt" 65 foot discharge combining it with Oxygen (he was afraid he could ignite the whole of Earth's atmosphere causing a chain reaction) which are two seperate considerations. I already referred to this, and his self acting oscillator a while back with document references. I don't understand what you mean by "form" of electricity; he used his HV coil at oscillating at 100KHz. To point you in the right direction, the Linde process is used to liquefy air (you can find the relevant patent and description of the process easily) by compressing, cooling it using the "delta T" of the external environment then expanding it in a partial feedback loop cooling the incoming air again.
I suggest you reread the document as it is composed of constructive analogies, which Tesla constantly used to explain all his devices:

http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/1900-06-00.htm

Nope, not the Linde process he wrote of way back in 1900. It was a photo of an apparatus invented much later that used scalar waves to precipitate or condense gas into a liquid. Have only run across it a few times in the last 20 years and probably invented after he wrote The Problem of Increasing Human Energy.

Core and I have a theory that Kapanadzi has a nitrogen laser in the core of his transformer. This quote from Tesla describes the process beautifully. The photons emitted would be equal to the hydrogen and oxygen gasses that bubble from the tank.

BTW - I am not going  to tell you that thing about Tesla you assume you know. Why? Should be obvious.

"To create such a "sink," or "cold hole," as we might say, in the medium, would be equivalent to producing in the lake a space either empty or filled with something much lighter than water.  This we could do by placing in the lake a tank, and pumping all the water out of the latter.  We know, then, that the water, if allowed to flow back into the tank, would, theoretically, be able to perform exactly the same amount of work which was used in pumping it out, but not a bit more.  Consequently nothing could be gained in this double operation of first raising the water and then letting it fall down.  This would mean that it is impossible to create such a sink in the medium.  But let us reflect a moment.  Heat, though following certain general laws of mechanics, like a fluid, is not such; it is energy which may be converted into other forms of energy as it passes from a high to a low level.  To make our mechanical analogy complete and true, we must, therefore, assume that the water, in its passage into the tank, is converted into something else, which may be taken out of it without using any, or by using very little, power.  For example, if heat be represented in this analogue by the water of the lake, the oxygen and hydrogen composing the water may illustrate other forms of energy into which the heat is transformed in passing from hot to cold.  If the process of heat transformation were absolutely perfect, no heat at all would arrive at the low level, since all of it would be converted into other forms of energy.  Corresponding to this ideal case, all the water flowing into the tank would be decomposed into oxygen and hydrogen before reaching the bottom, and the result would be that water would continually flow in, and yet the tank would remain entirely empty, the gases formed escaping.  We would thus produce, by expending initially a certain amount of work to create a sink for the heat or, respectively, the water to flow in, a condition enabling us to get any amount of energy without further effort.  This would be an ideal way of obtaining motive power.  We do not know of any such absolutely perfect process of heat-conversion, and consequently some heat will generally reach the low level, which means to say, in our mechanical analogue, that some water will arrive at the bottom of the tank, and a gradual and slow filling of the latter will take place, necessitating continuous pumping out.  But evidently there will be less to pump out than flows in, or, in other words, less energy will be needed to maintain the initial condition than is developed by the fall, and this is to say that some energy will be gained from the medium.  What is not converted in flowing down can just be raised up with its own energy, and what is converted is clear gain. Thus the virtue of the principle I have discovered resides wholly in the conversion of the energy on the downward flow."

[penno64]

@all,

Has anyone been following Delamorto ?

http://www.youtube.com/user/delamortodelamorto#p/a/u/0/OegYgl3STHY

I would love to replicate !

Has anyone been able to create a wiring diagram/schematic ?

I would love to know what the orange component is between flyback HV lead and
what seems to be a microwave oven diode.

I at first thought that he had two caps in parallel - but on closer inspection, I find that they are
ferrite beads.

I think his pop rivet spark gap is ingenious.

Is the secret in the doable winding method. It seems not so difficult if you view it at full screen.

Notice the vast difference when the toroids are disconnected from the ground point.

I can't believe more of you are not onto this !

Penno

[Choose username]

I would love to know what the orange component is between

oh that's right, it is diode!

PS
you can learn it all more detailed at delamorto's device topic here http://lix.in/-8f1771

[leo48]

I was thinking that perhaps Leedskalnin had built something similar
http://img705.imageshack.us/img705/6236/bottiglia.jpg
Leo48

[Shokac]

@all,

Has anyone been following Delamorto ?

http://www.youtube.com/user/delamortodelamorto#p/a/u/0/OegYgl3STHY

I would love to replicate !

Has anyone been able to create a wiring diagram/schematic ?

I would love to know what the orange component is between flyback HV lead and
what seems to be a microwave oven diode.

I at first thought that he had two caps in parallel - but on closer inspection, I find that they are
ferrite beads.

I think his pop rivet spark gap is ingenious.

Is the secret in the doable winding method. It seems not so difficult if you view it at full screen.

Notice the vast difference when the toroids are disconnected from the ground point.

I can't believe more of you are not onto this !

Penno

In this setup no OU. Orange and black component is diodes. I make this setup long time ago, and no happy end. :-( (no OU).

If turn in this coil ferrite core, light is stronger!