Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 133 Guests are viewing this topic.

forest

Quote from: stivep on February 16, 2011, 01:58:27 PM
Response from scientific group to:

"Some of this questions there are so unbelievably stupid
But you need to ask  to draw the picture.And subject is not stupid at all."

Answers:
Hi Wesley,
    Below are my answers.



A.is magnetic field wave and if it is
is that:
1-standing wave
2-stationary wave
3.traveling wave
4. mixture of everything
5. none of above

(If your answer is 5 than what is it ?)
A static magnetic  field has no wave properties. (5)

But the question is about magnetic wave  ;D There is no such thing as static field, or you proved that magnetic field is standing wave, then it is truly static in the sense of "steady state flow".
Either it is static in that sense and immediately response to any disturbance avoiding speed of light limit
or it is non-static and has to be field of wave-particle dualism responding not faster then the light limits it.

Quote
B. doest magnetic field have mass?
    A magnetic field does not have mass. It is a static energy field.
If it is static energy then could it perform work ? Could it respond to the change disturbing it ? If so, why you call it static ? If doesn't respond - why you call it energy ?


Quote
C. Is magnetic field  represented by propagation of  electrons?
There is no mass in a static magnetic field. No mass, No electrons, No Protons, No neutrons, No Photons.

The only way is to check if pure electric field can generate magnetic field in pure empty vacuum.


Pirate88179

Quote from: the_big_m_in_ok on February 16, 2011, 02:38:21 PM
I had my run-ins with a couple of Members, myself.  One is at the end of the thread I started,

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8010.msg274737#msg274737

Others have complained as well that hartiberlin does nothing.

--Lee

Stefan has removed some troublesome folks and I now have proper Moderator abilities here.

Bill
See the Joule thief Circuit Diagrams, etc. topic here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6942.0;topicseen

LtBolo

Quote from: iceweller on February 16, 2011, 03:28:40 PM
Just a brief personal note for all the sincere researchers I feel obliged to include at this point. I apologize for the slight off-topic.
Disinformation and disruption schemes work the same world wide and have been proven to be effective. Apart from the "innocent" disinformation by mere ignorance as suggested by ex-nihilo-est, the premeditated and predetermined one works in a "team" fashion, not just concocted by one single "stray" element or "agent". It is represented by a "controlled" group where apparently the elements flame and attack each other constantly in a specific pattern with similar wordings and sometimes with schizophrenic tendencies. One, or the other, gain the unaware users' trust or demise as it is standard for people only to discern and sympathise between 2 apparently opposing parties. The truth is, one should not side with either one and should be aware of the situation and not let the masked litigation contaminate the pure elements and data of the research.
By this I do not wish to point any finger at anyone. I am merely stating facts which I have learned with personal experience and wish to warn all users of this danger.
Please do not take these words lightly.

Yep. Spot on.


xenomorphlabs

Very good point iceweller and applies well to what has been going on in this thread for quite some time.
The apparently opposing elements of that group are exposed now and since Bill has moderator rights here too, the thread has good chances to become more focussed on the actual subject again.

LtBolo

I've been studying Tesla patent 685,958...Method of Utilizing Radiant Energy. It really is eye opening and to a great degree is confirming my thoughts on where the FE is coming from, or at least what devices like Kapanadze are doing to produce it.

Tesla said "sources of such radiant energy throw off with great velocity minute particles of matter which are strongly electrified". In general he saw these particles as being positively charged. In the patent he shows collection of radiant energy from the sun...which he also suggests is supplied at a slow rate...but he also shows an X-ray tube providing energy to a radiant collector. Why? It makes no sense to beam an X-ray tube at a radiant collector unless there were some advantage to doing so.

If others have some ideas I'd love to hear them, but the most logical answer that I can come up with is that the process of producing the X-rays can take less energy than the amount of energy gathered when collecting them, and can produce far higher energy levels than the sun. That fits perfectly with the refrigeration system discussions, and in my mind answers the question of why Tesla was so adamant that the energy should never be allowed to leave the coil. Big energy in the coil produced big amounts of radiant energy, without depleting the coil energy itself.

From the patent it is also obvious that Tesla saw radiant energy as an inherently DC thing. Capturing it in a cap and then discharging at some interval was necessary for converting back to AC. In Kapanadze's case, he could be discharging at 50Hz, but the production of energy could be occurring at the 100KHz and higher rate that his coil should be ringing at.

I can honestly say that I am very comfortable with where this theory has led me...but I am also hoping in the biggest way that I am not inadvertently sowing disinfo. I really want to see this happen on a broad scale, regardless of whether or not I can personally benefit.