Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[LtBolo]

Very good point iceweller and applies well to what has been going on in this thread for quite some time.
The apparently opposing elements of that group are exposed now and since Bill has moderator rights here too, the thread has good chances to become more focussed on the actual subject again.

Whenever I hear very loud protests from somebody, I am reminded of a quote from St. Paul where he points out that "those who judge practice the same things". It's always a funny thing when some TV preacher or politician or whomever, gets up and attacks something, while all the time are doing the very thing they attack. A very wise friend of mine always counsels me to "judge my judgments"...to search my own motives when I start judging another person's motives.

The louder and louder the spy vs spy thing got, the more I started questioning all who were involved. I cannot pretend to know what another person's motive is, and I will not try. That said, I agree wholeheartedly that if we can lower the volume a bunch and get back to what matters, it will be a welcome change.

Thank you Bill, for taking authority in the matter.

[quarktoo]

I've been studying Tesla patent 685,958...Method of Utilizing Radiant Energy. It really is eye opening and to a great degree is confirming my thoughts on where the FE is coming from, or at least what devices like Kapanadze are doing to produce it.

Tesla said "sources of such radiant energy throw off with great velocity minute particles of matter which are strongly electrified". In general he saw these particles as being positively charged. In the patent he shows collection of radiant energy from the sun...which he also suggests is supplied at a slow rate...but he also shows an X-ray tube providing energy to a radiant collector. Why? It makes no sense to beam an X-ray tube at a radiant collector unless there were some advantage to doing so.

If others have some ideas I'd love to hear them, but the most logical answer that I can come up with is that the process of producing the X-rays can take less energy than the amount of energy gathered when collecting them, and can produce far higher energy levels than the sun. That fits perfectly with the refrigeration system discussions, and in my mind answers the question of why Tesla was so adamant that the energy should never be allowed to leave the coil. Big energy in the coil produced big amounts of radiant energy, without depleting the coil energy itself.

From the patent it is also obvious that Tesla saw radiant energy as an inherently DC thing. Capturing it in a cap and then discharging at some interval was necessary for converting back to AC. In Kapanadze's case, he could be discharging at 50Hz, but the production of energy could be occurring at the 100KHz and higher rate that his coil should be ringing at.

I can honestly say that I am very comfortable with where this theory has led me...but I am also hoping in the biggest way that I am not inadvertently sowing disinfo. I really want to see this happen on a broad scale, regardless of whether or not I can personally benefit.

An x-ray tube is a vacuum accelerator. The Sun is also a particle accelerator. Sorry if I sound like a broken record but you asked.  .

There is another possibility that nobody seems to be exploring here and that is negative resistance resulting from cavitation.

I'll explain:

Cold electricity is particle discharge that results from shorting out a DC circuit and the particle emission is 90 degrees from the direction of current flow. We have that condition in the Kapanadze device and the spark gap triggers it.

Next we look at the center of the coil and what is there. A coil of wire or a capacitor matters not - they are both coils.

Next we look at the coil. If we have a perfectly symetrical wave hitting our coil then no work is going to get done UNLESS we use two coils that are OPPOSED. Then mass particles are going to be ejected from what is in the coil since that symetricle wave is going to smash together and CAVITATE what is in the middle of that.

The symmetric wave allows us to control exactly where that happens between those two oppositely would coils. 

Next we look at the wire size. If we want that the cavitation to occur inside the toroid, then the outer coil will need to be more robust or larger diameter wire. The cavitation will occur at the weakest point.

That would explain why with the Hubbard coil the larger wire increases output exponentionally. Some have stated that s single spiral of copper wire ran through the center inductor of the HUbbard coil. If we look at the Kapanadze coil, we see what appears to be litz wire (many small wires).

Next we look at the ground. Without the ground, the system becomes symmetrical and conservation of energy will apply OR it will build a charge around it and become dangerous. Since the ground is there to replentish the electron sea that was ejected through cavitation, the coil has a directional force and a pumping action. You can see how they are using that pumping action using three of these coils to produce magnetohydronaic effect.

My last thought on that coil is the value of a pancake coil. Since the flat face magnetizes fast verses the slow magnetic propagation of a coaxial coil, that will have advantages as tesla discovered.

So see if any of that fits into the compression / decompression scheme that Core and Bolo have been pimping. The reality is, you could explain this many different ways and probably get it right. I always look for the cavitation (natures amplifier) and acceleration (natures way of expelling energy from a space to create the vacuum energy we call electricity)

On that subject of spooks, I could car less if someone reads what I write. Where I have a problem is where they intentionally cross the line and begin planting fake info. or try to get someone banned that is moving toward the solution OR mess with my computer which they have. ...and yes, they do act as groups and they tend to have a latin name or in the past the nautical names. (Navel intelligence?)

I do not get notification emails from this web site anymore which tells me the site has been hacked. The search bar on the menu pops up a baloon which is a search redirect malware. The graphic for the search does not load which means that probably the script did not work and hung before the graphic was loaded.

A person like myself willing to throw ideas into the air is not being destructive. That is what research is, is exploring ideas. I read a lot of stuff and so I have lots of ideas. Most of them will be wrong but that does not take any wood off my pile. "If we knew what we were doing, we would not call it research" - Einstein.

Don't cross that line of intentionally being destructive and you have no problem with me. If I am playing with something dangerous and lots of people are hinting that, give me a clue as to why or a reason to find something else to play with and I will. I have no desire to plug myself or anyone else into the vast power of the universe by mistake or create something destructive.

The reality is, I inherited mineral rights in the middle of the biggest oil find in US history and they are drilling that oil well right now. Why do I need a free energy device when I now have a free money device? Because it is the right thing to do. Not for my family but for yours. You will never be secure until you place your worst enemies security ahead of your own. Then you have the whole world watching your back. It is just the right thing to do and I always share my ideas eventually whether you like it or not.

Herger won't be missed.

[LtBolo]

There is another possibility that nobody seems to be exploring here and that is negative resistance resulting from cavitation.

Cavitation is simply a mechanically forced state changed, as generally expressed in liquid to gas terms. As far as I am concerned, that is simply another way of describing exactly the theory I'm expressing. And please don't call it 'pimping'. I have nothing whatsoever to gain by sharing my thoughts with the folks on this forum, with the exception of a good peer discussion process.

At issue is where the energy comes from when that state change is forced, what form the energy takes when expelled, and what is the correct configuration of caps, coils, spark gaps, and the lot, that will allow us to take advantage of a well worn energy pathway in nature. My guess is that dang near every successful device out there uses some variant of these ideas. We just need to understand the most concept in it's most simple form, and then reduce that to a simple radiant emitter, and a simple radiant receiver. Ironically, I think Tesla already did that...if we can get past the fluff and get to the heart of it.

[stivep]

But the question is about magnetic wave  There is no such thing as static field, or you proved that magnetic field is standing wave, then it is truly static in the sense of "steady state flow".
Either it is static in that sense and immediately response to any disturbance avoiding speed of light limit
or it is non-static and has to be field of wave-particle dualism responding not faster then the light limits it.
If it is static energy then could it perform work ? Could it respond to the change disturbing it ? If so, why you call it static ? If doesn't respond - why you call it energy ?


The only way is to check if pure electric field can generate magnetic field in pure empty vacuum.

ALL OF THE ABOVE WAS GIVEN TO SCIENTIFIC  GROUP WITH REGARDS TO MAGNETIC FIELD OF MAGNET ONLY!!!

Coper Wire as coil will produce the same magnetic field but dynamic of that field will be different.
Stationary wave has traveling wave component .




Aligned dipols of iron react due to chemical reaction in subatomic structure as short circuit where once ignited energy is lifting electrons to the higher orbit.

It is like short circuit of coper wire with no resistance at all.
That is why magnet is able to retain its magnetic field.
due to molecular structure of iron #28 electrons




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hT20Faes1Jw

This video looks like mile stone in understanding Free Energy wow....

The guy is risking his reputation.... But it sound like official statement to mentioned institutions.





The example of standing wave bouncing  up/down... when you bring gaussmer  near vicinity of it. It will be energy exchange  with probe to read field. ..so... Such wave  is preforming work as theoretically should not.

Set of Questions for you before next meeting Sunday night at 8 PM.
What is  gravity?
versus
What is magnetism?


does gravity have flux?
does gravity propagate waves?
does gravity perform work?
what is the wavelength of gravity waves if any?
does gravity represent pure energy or mass/energy?
how heavy is gravity pole?per given distance?
What is the shape of gravity pole?
Is gravity  polarized?

some of this questions sound stupid but subject is not stupid at all.

Wesley

[c-man]

Would someone be willing to post a diagram of the Kapagen/Kapanadze system and explain how they think the individual components are connected. I constructed a Kapagen based on a diagram I got from the internet. The system performed the same whether I connected the ten 100Watt incandescent lamps through the coil or directly from the spark gap. The three coils wound in series but in different directions seemed to have no effect on the brightness of the lamps or the current draw at the primary of the MOT.