Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[LtBolo]

I think the bigest magic is when both frequencies match. Maybe it is the right way to shake external bonding electrons ?

I think it may be the most efficient way, although I haven't convinced myself either way about whether it is required or special. It is certainly something unique though, and it may give benefits that aren't obvious. It is definitely something I plan to play with more when we get our analyzer in.

[ePrick]

If you have spent any time with a hairpin, then why would you question the harmonic content of a direct short? That is one of the primary points of study of the hairpin, and the presence of standing waves of one or more frequency is the only way the hairpin can produce what it does. Given the bandwidth of the spark, you will find dozens of overtones ringing in the hairpin if you look.

As for the operation of SR's device, I have no clue, but I wouldn't say that the appearance of any coil or component would validate or invalidate a theory. At the end of the day, all of these devices operate on the basis of some physical principle previously un-described or not understood. Once that principle is understood, there will be dozens of way to accomplish the same thing.

Allow me to attempt to re-frame the discussion to allow for a more open mind.

You are convinced as most, including the patent holders, that there is some magical combination of frequencies that produces NMR in the element under study. This is not my thinking and I have read comments from SR on a Russian site that also discredit that belief.

While I don't intend to discuss the subject here, I have two inventions that are related to this and my experience of what is taking place corresponds to what SR alluded to.

I will further that statement by telling you that one of those inventions was stolen and patented by an electronics company that claims to promote free energy after I made the mistake of disclosing to a member of this forum years ago. The technology was shelved. I have not disclosed the second technique and don't plan to for obvious reasons.

I will tell you that in your classically trained view of electricity, you have overlooked something they don't really teach much about. You struggle to account for where the energy comes from without an accounting of the energy used and the energy gained or even the process used to extract it. It should take exactly as much energy to extract the two electrons as you would get from them.

How does the gain take place? The information is probably out there but you have to connect the dots with some super long lines that stretch to the end of the electron sea. There is far more going on in a hairpin than resonance, harmonics, overtones and 1Q.

Sorry I upset you but I am after all a "Prick".

Enjoy your day,

Ed Prick

[leo48]

I would really love to know what a K561NA7 crosses over to.

This obsolete chip is similar at CD4011
Leo48

[gyulasun]

....
I would really love to know what a K561NA7 crosses over to.

Hi Ed,

The K561NA7 has a data sheet here:

http://www.evita.lt/en/?pid=catalogue&action=search&keyword=k561la7&submit=Search

It seems to be equivalent to CD4011 (hex NAND gate, CMOS)

Gyula

EDIT Hi Leo sorry for the mail crossings.  lol

[ePrick]

Thanks guys, that helps clear up part of the confusion on the modulator.

Later this week I'll build that and share the results.