Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[FreeEnergyInfo]

Here is practical schematic diagram for Tiger device with ferrite Yoki from uSSr TV sets. Approval!!!!
Be aware of not approval replications from others!!!! It may cose damage your brain!

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/9781-tigers-device-0-150-1kwt-replicant-2.html#post166451

PLYZ POSTED SHEMATIC .....
PLEASE PUT HERE SHEMATIC ...

---------------------------------------------------

VIDEO ....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsQM3GUu8Y0&feature=player_embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUAxpek8ivg&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL

http://freeenergylt.narod2.ru/joule_thief/

[T-1000]

wattsup,

Good job for so far, now you need to run system with 2 generators and ferro-resonant LC circuit on copper plates in smaller yoke's diameter side. They should work as one system in the end of the day... And the sinus wave on output in resonance no matter what's on input with highest amplitude is your ultimate target. So copper plates ferrite resonant frequency+50 turns coil resonant harmonics+~50Hz on 15 turns coil to make your setup singing without distortions!
I also left comment for you on your part 6 of youtube video.

Jdo300,
You are on good course with yoke ferrite, in our version it was cone geometry.

CosmoLV,
Actually you could do a favor for everyone and replicate our device or show your working version..

Ganza,

The first device was made by Nicola Tesla more than 100 years ago no matter what you think
Look on his patents and find out his step-down transformer where he was using after magnifying transmitter.
Tiger is part of our team and his device version look similar but is not exactly like ours.
Hope that won't hurt your feeling and you can try replicate device we already did.


P.S> We had difficulty on finding good resonant harmonics on 50 turns coil (explained in instructions video) because our copper plates was too small(0.5cm). The original copper plates was much wider and with double layer. When we did put copper plates with same width, we got more than 15 kilovolts on the secondary coil after final tuning. In my oppinion the best width of copper plates would be 1/4 of deflection yoke heigh, That still needs to be verified but hopefully this will give you good experiment direction.

[verpies]

I have tried with FWBRs and there is no difference in the final voltage readings. This is because weather you take half wave or full wave, this will not increase the voltage output (maybe by 0.2 or 0.3 in some cases) but not enough to warrant adding three more diodes.

That's only because your ratio of the load's resistance to the internal resistance of the source is high.
If you decrease the load resistance (add more load) than the difference between Half Wave Rectifier and Full Wave Rectifier (FWR) would become more pronounced.

The additional advantage of FWR is less harmonic distortion in the source.

this is the best and simplest way to  hunt for effects, see the effects and know right away if anything warrants further more precise measurement.

No it is not.
You are apparently thinking that exact power measurements are not important as long as greater average voltage across your capacitor corresponds to greater true power delivered by the source. In other words, as long as this proportionality is maintained then effects can be judged properly.

...but higher amplitude is not synonymous with higher power !
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crest_factor

What if I show you two waveforms dissipating two different powers in purely resistive load, and at the same time your load circuit showing the opposite? Namely, less average voltage for the higher power waveform and more average voltage for the lower power waveform?

Would you be convinced then, that this is not an appropriate way to measure and judge the effects?

Since all the tests are conducted in the same manner, there is always the same comparison base and this is much better then trying many different Load Group strategies.

I don't suggest many different load strategies.
I suggest only one different load strategy - purely resistive.

[wattsup]

@T-1000

Thanks for your comment. I will continue with more FGs.

@verpies

We know all about the drawbacks as we have discussed this here and at OUR with endless methods. I also know about reactive power, power with higher voltage and power with higher amperage. But all these will manage to bring themselves down to the capacitor loaded common denominator and the volt meter is measuring the stabilized output and not being reactive to high voltages that have no juice behind it.

My scope is usually set at 5 volts and probe at 1x and sometimes I will see the scope waveform jump so high it is only possible to set the probe at 10x, but this high voltage has nothing to do with the true power being delivered to the Load Group. That's why this set up is more flexible. Also, when I started these series of videos, I try to keep it short so guys do not have to spend hours to find one effect. Also, my video 3 clearly was done to show only the FG on the Load Group and what the FG alone can do in terms of loaded output. This is my maximum no matter which way you look at it, technically, I should never be able to go above the Base Level no matter the coils or pulsing, etc. So this is my way to gauge the effects and I must say up till know it has proven to work very well.

Otherwise, can you imagine the number of readings you would require when pulsing not one frequency, but two or three sources. It would be totally hard to keep track of the meters, their numbers, milli and micro amps,  and all will just create continuous confusions and distract from the main goal. It all stops at the output and anything that comes near or above my Base Level will tell me right away without any chance of missing it because I am not continuously looking at other meters.

Anyways, thanks again for your input.

wattsup

[Jdo300]

Hello All,

I have finished winding the secondary coil for my setup (see pictures below). I didn't quite get the exact coil turn counts due to running out of the twisted wire I made but I'm hoping that I can make adjustments to compensate for the smaller winding count.

Anyway, below are some basic measurements on the windings:

Copper Strip
0.046 Ohms
8.5 uH

Primary 1
41 turns
0.267 Ohms
712 uH

Primary 2
15 turns
0.113 Ohms
83.5 uH

Secondary
65 x 2 turns bifilar (130 total)
1.36 Ohms
5.13 mH

@ T-1000,

Thanks for your feedback . I'm getting ready to do some basic pulse tests on the coils to get some idea of what resonant frequency the setup likes to ring. Will post back once I have some additional data to report.

Also, the new op-amp circuit diagram that you uploaded to your website doesn't appear to show the 1-2 turn coil connections for the feedback. (I'm assuming you explain all of this in the video that Wesley is preparing). But anyway, looking forward to more details as I will be ready to start driving the system soon.

- Jason O