Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 375 Guests are viewing this topic.

DreamThinkBuild

Hi Vlad,

Welcome to the forums and thank you for the document.

Hi MasterPlaster,

Google translate stops half way through on the translation. I started reading it by copying/pasting each page individually then saving the results to a text file. Slow going but fascinating paper.

znel

Quote from: jbignes5 on December 23, 2011, 08:17:58 AM

I think my take on this is somewhat confused. So we have CW for emitter and CCW for the receiver or visa versa. In my opinion this would follow the cog analogy. Two gears butted together have opposite moves but are of the same direction. I ran into this in my experiemnts with the one magnet no bearing Bedini motor. All of the satalite magnets turned in the opposite direction, this is due to the magnetic fields working like a gear system.

I don't see it as a cog analogy, more of a phase difference - the transimitter coil is negative the reciever positive then they reverse - always creating a potential difference between them...

Quote
I think the reason we can't do it like you state is because there is extra added from the conversion after it travels into the world from the boosted source. You can call this condensed energy. When it hits the receiver all of the available signal to the receiver is channeled into the receiver coil and transformed down to a level we can use. Any condensed energy is then pulled into the device and converted for our use. The higher the potential the more reach the condensing waves have and the more condensed energy accumulates. Condensing in this case is the response from the environment flowing back to the source of the pulse waves. Think about the ocean and currents, the waves might go one way and the current goes another. This is usually called undertow. This undertow is not area specific. So as long as a wave is present there is potential for the undertow to be present. In the case of the receiver the antenna gets struck by the waves and excites the channel into the ground. This opens the flow and the undertow is allowed to go to ground. We now can induce current from the flow into the ground via the coil around the excited antenna, which if properly built has little to no resistance to this flow besides the inductive resistance. In the case of a bifilar there is near zero self inductive resistance since all of the fields are oriented in one direction in the bifilar. In fact I believe the bifilar is an accelerator of energy. Add that to the cap dump and you can see how these things work to a degree. Also remember Tesla said these bifilar coils act more like a capacitor and can be charged as such and modulated from that charge value. The capacitance can be increased by improving the dielectric. For air to oil there is a huge jump in the dielectric properties and should make the bifilar quite leak proof.

Look at the colorado springs notes beginning on pg136 where he is experimenting with various recievers.  "Modifications of apparatus, involving condenser method of magnifying effects, experimented with "Self-exciting" process.   With the small experiments I've done with the basic circuit, there is no conversion from one voltage to another all the HV is fed back to the primary tank to be reused and amplified in the next cycle.   Since their self excited any external signal that they were tuned to would be amplified.

Quote
  Another thing I wanted to talk about is streamers. Streamers are a sign that the capacitance on the tip of the antenna is breaking down. When we increase the surface area of the tip of the antenna it makes this breakdown go away. Any leakage at this point (breakdown) will be detrimental to the output because the environment is responding to the pulses and shorting out into the capacitor. I'm not sure if this is a bad thing.

I would consider streamers detrimental to the idea of what we're trying to achieve.   We don't want to push energy into the environment we want to create a receiver of energy - a potential difference that attracts charges.

Quote
The Kacher seems to use this leakage to induce current into the spiral coil around it. I guess it all depends on the mode of the coils. The Kacher is also a free oscillator and Tesla talks about it in that patent.

Also I went back to the Tesla tower and looked at the design a bit.

http://www.teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla-patents-1,119,732-transmitting-electrical-energy

The Tower looks just like a kacher system. Except the traditional running coil has been shorted with a cap. Charge the cap and this thing would run by itself wouldn't it? Charge cap, wait for channel to open from tip to base then the cap gets charged really high. Spark gap Discharge the cap into a transformer and walla power.

As a side note lets look at this entire theory of the natural medium. http://pw1.netcom.com/~sbyers11/images.htm

It's a tough read but you just might get something out of it.

I'd call most of the tesla systems a passive oscillator -  Any HV source that will charge the capacitor to a point that it will jump the gap sets it into oscillaton.    I built one using groups of HV solar panels in series - using them as the input in place of an NST or other HV source.    The panels consisted of 6 - 50 volt open circuit panels in series to provide a 300 volt charge to the cap, a 240 volt GDT was used as the spark gap.  Pretty simple project/experiment.   

What started me thinking in this direction was a failed experiment, I simply couldn't get resonance on a coil I was working on at the time, many years back when my understanding was limited... The cap was charged to 5kv and maintained the charge very very well, quite dangerous actually.   When it was powered down I kept hearing a mild "tick", probably in the range of 30 hz.   It took a while to finally figure out what was going on but when I did I realized it was still oscillating.   Grabbing my scope probe verified it was in fact still oscillating with a very long ring down between each tick.   I played with this, what I considered a failure, for several days after - adjusting the gap and recharging the cap.   I set it up with a neon bulb on the pos side of the cap and an antenna on the other leg and it would light as long as there was oscillations.    This would run for 17 hours ( best run time achieved with it ) before the energy was depleted to a point where it could no longer jump the gap.   This wasn't a visible spark, more like an ionic breakdown.   At first I though it was operating more like an air capacitor of very small value - which this might have played a part.  So because of the failed attempt at the original device I learned something I wasn't even looking for... I've built many different passive oscillators since experimenting with different aspects of it...  the key is very high inductance,  like lasersabre's original joule ringer. 

forest

Znel
So do you think we can oscillate charge between ground and antenna ? Or between two metals maybe ? between two ground places ? what is the best method ?


znel

Quote from: forest on December 23, 2011, 03:37:58 PM
Znel
So do you think we can oscillate charge between ground and antenna ? Or between two metals maybe ? between two ground places ? what is the best method ?

I'd have to say yes on all accounts.   As far as the best method, that would be dependent on what your trying to achieve.  In all 3 questions capacitance comes to mind - moving charges at resonance between two points.