Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[scratchrobot]

I was interested from time to time in doing that experiment series but always but it aside in pursue of others. I am very confident that none documented experiment from an tinkerer's point of view has been done, or published at least. Perhaps its time to play with HV HF discharges, magnetic fields and all the happy stuff?


ps: some food for thought http://www.springerlink.com/content/v714166678558163/

Well only one way to find out if it works  I will try with permanent magnets first.

[verpies]

You seem not to understand basic Fourier analysis. You do not understand the purpose of my post, although I stated it three times.

I understand very well that a rectangular pulse (e.g. Dirac Delta function) is equivalent to a sum of infinite series of odd harmonics (series of sine waves of integer frequency multiples).

However in an LCR circuit (such as the Kacher) the shape of the current oscillations does not follow the shape of the exciting transient voltage pulse.  Thus a rectangular voltage excitation pulse does not produce noise or a wide bandwidth oscillation in a real coil.  On the contrary - the Fourier analysis of this oscillation shows it to be a very narrowband signal.
Voltage is just a potential, current is the actual event arising from the movement of electric charges that are responsible for the magnetic fields in coils.

Please study the Laplace transform in a transient response of an LCR circuit, especially the relationship between the exciting transient rectangular pulse and the resulting sinusoid oscillation in an underdamped case.  The Fourier analysis of this oscillation shows it to be a very narrowband signal.

In you reply (which in contrast, I would welcome) don't focus solely on the exciting voltage pulse but also consider the oscillations of electric current, that this potential pulse causes.

Please answer the original question: how can the amplitude of the oscillations increase after the SW1 is opened and how is it possible for the damping factor (known as Alpha) to be less than zero (resulting in a trumpet envelope) ?

[Begemotov]

@All & @STAAAR Team members especially.

Guys, you're doing very important work. But you are in the risk zone, not only becase the free energy may change the world. You are risking by your health. There are many biological-active factors in these fringe-experiments, some of them are not so well understood. One of this is "torsion radiation". I guess by the configuration on your devices, that this factor is definitly here.

Maybe this review (in Russian only, sorry) will help you to protect yourself from this factor:

"Effects of non-electromagnetic radiation" (Beta-version, Sept 2011)

http://www.second-physics.ru/work/zhigalov_effects.pdf


Regards, Vlad
-------

Ð'сем привеÑ,, и оÑ,дельно славной команде STAAAR!

РебяÑ,а, вы делаеÑ,е очень важную рабоÑ,у. Но вы очень здорово рискуеÑ,е, и не Ñ,олько поÑ,ому, чÑ,о свободная энергия можеÑ, измениÑ,ÑŒ мир. Ð'Ñ‹ рискуеÑ,е своим здоровьем. Ð' эÑ,иÑ... пограничныÑ... эксперименÑ,аÑ... много биологически-акÑ,ивныÑ... Ñ,,акÑ,оров, часÑ,ÑŒ из коÑ,орыÑ... не вполне поняÑ,ны. Один из ниÑ... - "Ñ,орсионное излучение". Я предполагаю, исÑ...одя из сÑ,роения вашиÑ... усÑ,ройсÑ,в, чÑ,о эÑ,оÑ, Ñ,,акÑ,ор определÑ'нно присуÑ,сÑ,вуеÑ,.

МожеÑ, быÑ,ÑŒ эÑ,оÑ, обзор (пока Ñ,олько на русском) поможеÑ, вам защиÑ,иÑ,ься оÑ, эÑ,ого Ñ,,акÑ,ора:

"ХаракÑ,ерные эÑ,,Ñ,,екÑ,Ñ‹ неэлекÑ,ромагниÑ,ного излучения" (беÑ,а-версия, сенÑ,ябрь 2011)

http://www.second-physics.ru/work/zhigalov_effects.pdf

Удачи,
Ð'лад

[jbignes5]

I believe most if not all of tesla's units use the CW CCW primary/secondary.   CW CW would alter polarity of the secondary.   An easy test is to have a moveable primary where you can move it from one end to the other. 

By adding lots of conversions you also introduce more losses.   When we start with a low voltage and boost it to peak output we also need to reduce it to get an output that is useable.   Why not use a system where input and output voltages are equal.   No conversions within the main oscillator, then use a receiver to extract energy in a useable form thus only use the energy at the point it is to be wasted through a circuit.   If you adjust the receiver to be off by 60hz you introduce a beat that you can use to drive common devices at the lower voltage.   The output of a beat frequency is the addition of the two waves crossing which gives you a little boost as well.   On my youtube channel I show a video of an LED connected through an AV plug then connected to an antenna line that picks up the hum of a 60hz line, I introduce a 59 hz signal from a FG at 1/2 volt.   The LED is a 3.7 volt ultra bright and it shows the beat frequency and the intensity of change as the waves pass each other.   The output is a 1hz signal returned with enough intensity to power the LED.

I've never tried putting the primary in the center of the coil but I've seen it done - it does work.   I'm not sure I see a difference as the inside should have the same or similar field as the outside in close proximity.

Interesting stuff indeed....

I think my take on this is somewhat confused. So we have CW for emitter and CCW for the receiver or visa versa. In my opinion this would follow the cog analogy. Two gears butted together have opposite moves but are of the same direction. I ran into this in my experiemnts with the one magnet no bearing Bedini motor. All of the satalite magnets turned in the opposite direction, this is due to the magnetic fields working like a gear system.


I think the reason we can't do it like you state is because there is extra added from the conversion after it travels into the world from the boosted source. You can call this condensed energy. When it hits the receiver all of the available signal to the receiver is channeled into the receiver coil and transformed down to a level we can use. Any condensed energy is then pulled into the device and converted for our use. The higher the potential the more reach the condensing waves have and the more condensed energy accumulates. Condensing in this case is the response from the environment flowing back to the source of the pulse waves. Think about the ocean and currents, the waves might go one way and the current goes another. This is usually called undertow. This undertow is not area specific. So as long as a wave is present there is potential for the undertow to be present. In the case of the receiver the antenna gets struck by the waves and excites the channel into the ground. This opens the flow and the undertow is allowed to go to ground. We now can induce current from the flow into the ground via the coil around the excited antenna, which if properly built has little to no resistance to this flow besides the inductive resistance. In the case of a bifilar there is near zero self inductive resistance since all of the fields are oriented in one direction in the bifilar. In fact I believe the bifilar is an accelerator of energy. Add that to the cap dump and you can see how these things work to a degree. Also remember Tesla said these bifilar coils act more like a capacitor and can be charged as such and modulated from that charge value. The capacitance can be increased by improving the dielectric. For air to oil there is a huge jump in the dielectric properties and should make the bifilar quite leak proof.


Somewhere in my ramblings I posted that bifilar coils are the receiver coil of this pulse wave he was seeing.. Remember the coil pulsing reactions. Pulse with a positive charge and you receive a negative high voltage response. With the bifilar coil both the pulse and the response are combined at the same time.

This is seen as a rise in amplitude of the signal and the slowing or sustain is increased of the signal. I know I'm getting some of this wrong. I don't have the understanding yet of the complex reactions of this area.

My focus right now is the patent that shows 2 turn coils around the flat spirals with an antenna coming 90 degrees out of the center of that spiral. If we can figure out how to apply this to our circuits then we will have more for less in the receiver section.

http://www.teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla-patents-685,012-increasing-electrical-oscillations

Another thing I wanted to talk about is streamers. Streamers are a sign that the capacitance on the tip of the antenna is breaking down. When we increase the surface area of the tip of the antenna it makes this breakdown go away. Any leakage at this point (breakdown) will be detrimental to the output because the environment is responding to the pulses and shorting out into the capacitor. I'm not sure if this is a bad thing.

The Kacher seems to use this leakage to induce current into the spiral coil around it. I guess it all depends on the mode of the coils. The Kacher is also a free oscillator and Tesla talks about it in that patent.

Also I went back to the Tesla tower and looked at the design a bit.

http://www.teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla-patents-1,119,732-transmitting-electrical-energy

The Tower looks just like a kacher system. Except the traditional running coil has been shorted with a cap. Charge the cap and this thing would run by itself wouldn't it? Charge cap, wait for channel to open from tip to base then the cap gets charged really high. Spark gap Discharge the cap into a transformer and walla power.

As a side note lets look at this entire theory of the natural medium. http://pw1.netcom.com/~sbyers11/images.htm

It's a tough read but you just might get something out of it.

[MasterPlaster]

@All & @STAAAR Team members especially.

Guys, you're doing very important work. But you are in the risk zone, not only becase the free energy may change the world. You are risking by your health. There are many biological-active factors in these fringe-experiments, some of them are not so well understood. One of this is "torsion radiation". I guess by the configuration on your devices, that this factor is definitly here.

Maybe this review (in Russian only, sorry) will help you to protect yourself from this factor:

"Effects of non-electromagnetic radiation" (Beta-version, Sept 2011)

http://www.second-physics.ru/work/zhigalov_effects.pdf


Regards, Vlad
-------

Ð'сем привеÑ,, и оÑ,дельно славной команде STAAAR!

РебяÑ,а, вы делаеÑ,е очень важную рабоÑ,у. Но вы очень здорово рискуеÑ,е, и не Ñ,олько поÑ,ому, чÑ,о свободная энергия можеÑ, измениÑ,ÑŒ мир. Ð'Ñ‹ рискуеÑ,е своим здоровьем. Ð' эÑ,иÑ... пограничныÑ... эксперименÑ,аÑ... много биологически-акÑ,ивныÑ... Ñ,,акÑ,оров, часÑ,ÑŒ из коÑ,орыÑ... не вполне поняÑ,ны. Один из ниÑ... - "Ñ,орсионное излучение". Я предполагаю, исÑ...одя из сÑ,роения вашиÑ... усÑ,ройсÑ,в, чÑ,о эÑ,оÑ, Ñ,,акÑ,ор определÑ'нно присуÑ,сÑ,вуеÑ,.

МожеÑ, быÑ,ÑŒ эÑ,оÑ, обзор (пока Ñ,олько на русском) поможеÑ, вам защиÑ,иÑ,ься оÑ, эÑ,ого Ñ,,акÑ,ора:

"ХаракÑ,ерные эÑ,,Ñ,,екÑ,Ñ‹ неэлекÑ,ромагниÑ,ного излучения" (беÑ,а-версия, сенÑ,ябрь 2011)

http://www.second-physics.ru/work/zhigalov_effects.pdf

Удачи,
Ð'лад

This looks a very comprehensive document. Would someone with a decent translator run this document through and publish it in English?

thanks