Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[xenomorphlabs]

yes I am sure this has better potential than some SUSPICIOUS SR VIDEO which nobody cant replicate ..

See Veljko Milkovic dual stage pendulum , ITS JUST PENDULUM and makes from 2-12 times OU...
Resonance system is also equivalent to pendulum

There is already some people who started to "think".
There is some wonderful threads for you to consider to participate in :
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=1656.0
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7443.0
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7530.0

[grizli]

There is already some people who started to "think".
There is some wonderful threads for you to consider to participate in :
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=1656.0
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7443.0
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7530.0

nice links

thanks

[armagdn03]

Griz, you have to de-bunk some things in order to proceed.

One wire electricity... what about that? You think it has anything special (in the free energy context of course) than ordinary except the fact that propages single wire?
Its vast potential is that it can trasmit power via the ground (as the ground is a conductor) that Tesla has been striving to do without the need of any infrastructure or return wire.

..
I am to contemplate thoughts on previous Xeno sayings. Too many people here that are years in this field of research say again and again parrot-like the same concepts even though they have been extensively tested in myriad setups and found underunity at all times. (example Bedini's SSG one of the widest replicated contraptions)

Lets talk about Tesla's LC electrical resonant setups. There is not a formal claim of this great Inventor that succeeded to make any surpluss watt (even tried to do so admittedly).
Resonance has been utilized more than our toilets! No OU ever reported or observed in that (and confirmed in replication).

Many times, people fail to see what is in front of them due to a limited perspective. I have found its better to blaze your own trail than try and dissect the work of others. In that light I presented Eccentric transformer theory, which within the confines of modern understanding demonstrates free energy both in theory and practice.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8609.0 
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/5199-eccentric-transformer-theory.html

Using only resonance, and a good understanding of inverse squared law, laws of induction, and Lenz law, we can show very simple over-unity devices. I have solved and given solutions for both capacitive transformer action based on Gauss's law, and inductive transformer action. I believe Dr. Stiffler is showing this in many of his demonstrations, and I have repeated many experiments and posted a few of the ones that do not raise any flags or cause trouble for myself.

One can even take advantage of flux linkage, rotating one coil with respect to the others axis, causing a "separation" to occur, based on the cosine of the angle of difference. This creates TPU like devices.

I have created  Kapanadze devices,  before I knew who he was..though I have titled them eccentric transformers...and now it seems his devices has differed from his patents.

There was initial interest in this release of information (which I pondered for a very long time as to whether I should open my mouth) but it seems that few tried to actually understand the very very simple concepts with 7th grade mathematics that went along with it, and so the threads died rather quickly. Anyways, I hope this will spark some ideas. This explains many inventions in my mind, Hubbard, Tesla wireless, witricity, Dr. Stiffler, Kapandze, room full of tuning forks analogy, and so on. It actually describes particle interaction as well, considering most particles have the same characteristics as a resonant structure such as an inductor in resonance, and communicating with adjacent particles. These being magnetic and electric components at right angle orientations to one another.

This is REAL OU, with REAL science behind it, that is so simple, its crazy

[IceStorm]

Griz, you have to de-bunk some things in order to proceed.

One wire electricity... what about that? You think it has anything special (in the free energy context of course) than ordinary except the fact that propages single wire?
Its vast potential is that it can trasmit power via the ground (as the ground is a conductor) that Tesla has been striving to do without the need of any infrastructure or return wire.

..
I am to contemplate thoughts on previous Xeno sayings. Too many people here that are years in this field of research say again and again parrot-like the same concepts even though they have been extensively tested in myriad setups and found underunity at all times. (example Bedini's SSG one of the widest replicated contraptions)

Lets talk about Tesla's LC electrical resonant setups. There is not a formal claim of this great Inventor that succeeded to make any surpluss watt (even tried to do so admittedly).
Resonance has been utilized more than our toilets! No OU ever reported or observed in that (and confirmed in replication).

And so many others...

Perhaps we should focus on things that have some potential rather than re-circulating old theories and concepts.

Really nice post Baroutologos, longtime member on different OU forum have a hedge in this quest even if they didn't know, they know what don't work, the hole OU.com forum is filled with bad science interpretation and non working device. That seem bad but it depend on the point of view, that show all the way people should not take to archive they goal. As you pointed out , the SSG is really a joke when we think on the number of replication and we still see new people everyday trying to replicate it with the idea in mind that's the holy grail and they will be the first one to really make it work beside the fact that all DVD that John Bedini sold only show a device running with no proof at all of any gain and no real replicable self runner in more than 6 years.

Eric Dollard was right finally about the Magnetic way to archive OU if you think about all magnetic device that people worked on with no success, its a loosing battle with thousand and thousand of proof in all OU forum.

Best Regards,
IceStorm

[IceStorm]

Many times, people fail to see what is in front of them due to a limited perspective. I have found its better to blaze your own trail than try and dissect the work of others. In that light I presented Eccentric transformer theory, which within the confines of modern understanding demonstrates free energy both in theory and practice.

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8609.0 
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/5199-eccentric-transformer-theory.html

Using only resonance, and a good understanding of inverse squared law, laws of induction, and Lenz law, we can show very simple over-unity devices. I have solved and given solutions for both capacitive transformer action based on Gauss's law, and inductive transformer action. I believe Dr. Stiffler is showing this in many of his demonstrations, and I have repeated many experiments and posted a few of the ones that do not raise any flags or cause trouble for myself.

One can even take advantage of flux linkage, rotating one coil with respect to the others axis, causing a "separation" to occur, based on the cosine of the angle of difference. This creates TPU like devices.

I have created  Kapanadze devices,  before I knew who he was..though I have titled them eccentric transformers...and now it seems his devices has differed from his patents.

There was initial interest in this release of information (which I pondered for a very long time as to whether I should open my mouth) but it seems that few tried to actually understand the very very simple concepts with 7th grade mathematics that went along with it, and so the threads died rather quickly. Anyways, I hope this will spark some ideas. This explains many inventions in my mind, Hubbard, Tesla wireless, witricity, Dr. Stiffler, Kapandze, room full of tuning forks analogy, and so on. It actually describes particle interaction as well, considering most particles have the same characteristics as a resonant structure such as an inductor in resonance, and communicating with adjacent particles. These being magnetic and electric components at right angle orientations to one another.

This is REAL OU, with REAL science behind it, that is so simple, its crazy

I entirely missed your thread, seem interessting , at least you back it up with logic and mathematical concept, ill take a read this week. Great work Arma. Capacitive coupling is really unexplored taken on a different angle.

Best Regards,
IceStorm