Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[IceStorm]

" I recognized that it was of tremendous advantage to break at the peak of the wave.  If I used just an ordinary break, it would make and break the current at low as well as high points of the wave.  Of this apparatus I had two forms; one in which I drove the break right from the shaft of the dynamo and the other in which I drove it with an isochronous motor.  Then, by a movement of these knobs (K K), I would make the adjustments so that the makes would occur exactly at the top of the wave.  That is a form of break which is embodied in hundreds of patents and used now extensively."

Tesla own words.
http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/nt_on_ac.htm

i never thought that was not his own word, i wanted to see the reference to know which experiment he was referring with that statement. Thx for the link.

Best Regards,
IceStorm 

[armagdn03]

[A author=forest link=topic=7679.msg237853#msg237853 A=1271445727]
armagdn03 method is only intermediate one when non-symmetric design makes delay which is responsible for small energy excess.Small divergence in Lenz law. Why ? To answer that we shave to understand Lenz law, which is electrical equivalent of Newton third law.
All answers seems to be revealed in Don Smith videos. He presented a couple of Tesla circuit in one of pictures.

This is very much incorrect.

This is not a small divergence by any means. At 1 radius from the source, the gain is square of the input.

You can gain cube of the input and so on, though builds become very very tedious in paying attention to detail. For example, say you have 256 units from source, move away 2 radius, and the pick up feels 16 units, which according to lenz law must return the 16 units, a distance of 2 radii, which means you must cut by a factor of four twice (inverse squared law) leaving the source diminished by 1 unit. You have now created 16 units, for the price of 1.

Don Smith alluded to these concepts, but fleshed NOTHING out, I have spoken to Dr Lindemann in person on this topic, and can assure you, you don't need to go looking to obscure references, go with the math, go with the equations that are tried and true, and see how our tools are correct, but our theories are not.

[armagdn03]

So you seriously see this principle present here too ?
Please be so kind and consider a demonstration of your Kapanadze device.

No, I do not see this present in all of these embodiments, I was referring to the Kapandze patent, which had two inductors wound about individual centers, placed adjacent.

[forest]

This is very much incorrect.

This is not a small divergence by any means. At 1 radius from the source, the gain is square of the input.

You can gain cube of the input and so on, though builds become very very tedious in paying attention to detail. For example, say you have 256 units from source, move away 2 radius, and the pick up feels 16 units, which according to lenz law must return the 16 units, a distance of 2 radii, which means you must cut by a factor of four twice (inverse squared law) leaving the source diminished by 1 unit. You have now created 16 units, for the price of 1.

Don Smith alluded to these concepts, but fleshed NOTHING out, I have spoken to Dr Lindemann in person on this topic, and can assure you, you don't need to go looking to obscure references, go with the math, go with the equations that are tried and true, and see how our tools are correct, but our theories are not.

I understand you,it's really simple and math prove that but you are still operating with VAR .
However "Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality."

[forest]

How do you plan to convert VAR into real usable EM energy ?