Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[forest]

@ForestDo you think that Tesla did not utilize mathematics and equations? In fact he performed all these calculations in his mind and applied them to the devices he also perfected in his mind as he has categorically stated on many occasions. Now ask yourself how you can hope to understand what Tesla was speaking of when you cannot or will not even perform the simple and necessary calculations on paper?. As well, you have taken Tesla's words completely out of context, he was referring to Einsteins General Relativity in the statement you quoted.
Now tell me what are VAR's?, I know this word seems to roll off the tongue of many a common electrician as if they would know what it is but what is it really? I would really like to here your explanation of VAR's as it relates to what Armagdn03 is referring to.
Regards
AC

I'm not electrician.  You tell me what is VAR, for me it is beast which do not like to be catched.
EE tries to do that and ends with EM radiaton and other waste products.armagnd found a way to catch a little from VAR using  eccentric transformer which looks like normal transformer plus antenna (a wire opened at one side)
Now,you tell me where is VAR in wire opened from BOTH sides at the exact and correct moment  ? Look what Tesla did  chronologically : first he experimented with eccentric transformer (yep ,the same) then he abandoned it and perfected circuit breaker ....

[grizli]

This is REAL OU, with REAL science behind it, that is so simple, its crazy

SO.. question for all !!

Lets make TC with concentrated parameters.
we DONT have elevated capacity, we have tunable capacitor between both secondaries (reciever , transmitter) and other ends of secondaries are connected together
Low turn(5 turns) of 1st coil is LC resonance ,  transmitter and reciever are L+L=2L and they make 2LC resonance ... frequency must be tuned of both LC resonators..
around second coil there is also low turn wire.
Putting resistive load or even shorting the wire will reduce reciever inductance by "transformer law"(back emf) but we just tune series C to match low turn wire resonance ..
IN ANY WAY feeder 5 turn coil SEES NO LOAD ... BIGGER the high turn wire inductance bigger the Reactive energy inside!!!

THIS WAY WE HAVE 1:1 transformer effectively . and primary fluw has nothing to do with secondary flux


PROVE ME in theory  or in  experimeny that I am WRONG .. !!!!!!!

[grizli]

Here is a super simple demonstration with math and concept explained.


You guys do not need me to show you anything other than concept and proof of concept in its SIMPLEST form. None of this dissection of fuzzy photos from an obscure video stuff. Really think about this, its all right here.

SPLIT coil to two coil  in series with capacitor to make paralel LC TOGETHER ..
magnetic field of first coil is FAR away from magnetic field of secondary coil
Transfirmer action (back emf) on one half of the coil does NOT affect first half magneticly in ANY WAY, ZERO AFFECT ..  tune series C(between two coils) to mach feeder resonance  cause load on one coil will lower by back emf inductance if one coil .. other coil is unaffected
what you think about that?

[baroutologos]

@ Forest,

man you should have become a priest! You have a way of telling things.

Apart from jokes, concerning your Tesla's quote i have some minor experience about in breaking at the peak of the wave and can say the following. I have studied the whole text and considered the context of what Tesla was talking about I understood the followning:

He does not speak of voltage wave. He speaks of current wave. He used his generators in order to charge capacitors for resonance settings. Generators have a nominal voltage Y. Tesla with his rotating brushes was cutting the current flow at maximum value, thus the stored energy of inductor's  overcharged the capacitor at value Y (flyback current) instead of following the steady siniwave decline (of current and voltage).
Of course this setup in order to work required commutators and not spark-gaps. This principle is clearly demonstrated at ozone and ignition patent. I am afraid there is no magic in that.

@ pirate,
I do not want to go the OU discusion all over. Yes earth batteries and elevated terminals that are grounded are natural energy sources (little though) as the solar panel or a windmill. When i am refering as OU i mean the energy to come from distinct means that the well known.

@Armagedon,
I have reviewed your theory again in energeticforum.com some time ago till i forgot about it. Seems plausible. Any experimental step so far?

[amigo]

I keep saying that Russians are onto something but everyone here continues to ramble about non-sense theories and imaginary shit that only exists in their heads.

Well, I really, REALLY, think all of you should to drop what you are doing at the moment and go check the Russian forums. Make your pick, but I think the best place might be matrix.3nx.ru.

In the Kapanadze thread (http://www.matrix.3nx.ru/viewtopic.php?t=3) look for posts from the fellow named Ð"енри_Нильский in the last couple of pages. What's mentioned is scalars, Kacher, ferrite cores, Tesla, HV, etc...