Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[haithar]

The i/p versus o/p is not so important at this time as proof of concept.

no the overunity part IS the proof of concept. Otherwise you just transform some voltages and power your loads with it, nothing out of the ordinary. Of course you can use voltage and power a load with it when the earth is on the other side. this is standard 1-phase plug use.

[broli]

Many many light bulbs. When will it selfrunning...?

It doesn't look like they are as bright anymore. So don't know how accurate that wattage is. Simple test can be to hook them up to regular outlet and compare brightness and power input.

[xenomorphlabs]

Mr. Naudin made it clear now:

My current Kapanadze generator v3.2 is only an attempt of replication of the Tariel's original device based on the Nikola Tesla fuelless generator.

People put too big expectations at a too early stage on his first efforts to realize this.
It is best to wait and see how his improvements and the "learning by doing" will scale this up and then only think about Input/Output relationships.

[haithar]

Mr. Naudin made it clear now:

People put too big expectations at a too early stage on his first efforts to realize this.
It is best to wait and see how his improvements and the "learning by doing" will scale this up and then only think about Input/Output relationships.

In my opinion this is the opposite of how ou should be researched. I mean if you have a 90% efficient device which works on some type of voltage transformation that is really great and cool, as it's really efficient, but that's still not overunity. And in researching it further you can probably get a bit better percentage, but the gap to overunity cannot be made if the technology doesn't allow for it. And that is most likely the case if your device works in a way but not overunity.
The gap from <1 to >1 isn't a thing which can be done with a bit of improvement, that is the fundamental thing really.
All these 'almost there' news are pointless in the end, because no one can make the 'last' (but really the first) step to achieve a cop of >1.

the case would be a different if you put in a specific amount of electrical energy and show that there is more heat produced than put in. this is the first step (already a overunity effect), the next would be to make it more efficient in a way, that you could get electrical energy + heat (still overunity) out of it, and the greatest success would be a large portion of usable energy and the rest heat.

[xenomorphlabs]

All these 'almost there' news are pointless in the end, because no one can make the 'last' (but really the first) step to achieve a cop of >1.

That is not quite true.
Just one example: Research the Kromrey converter. COP of 1.5 and prognosed max COP of little less than 3.

And according to Bolt, you can look at Naudin´s current set-up as being still out-of-tune or simply tuned to a low gain frequency range.
Kapanadze´s spark gap points to a higher frequency.

There is devices that are confined to operate in the area of COP 1-3 and there is devices that go into the many hundreds or closed looped.