Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 221 Guests are viewing this topic.

gyulasun

Quote from: baroutologos on June 09, 2010, 06:52:56 AM
Hello Pirate,

I guess this is the type of winding you are saying.
I think this manifests null inductucance if both parts have same current strength (same resistance, same inductunce)

Hi Baroutologos,

If you still have the two  nails with the coils on them, would you measure the inductances with your L meter as follows:

Single coil on one nail, measures: ... uH

Bifilar coil on the other nail measures
between A-B: ... uH
between B-C: ... uH
between A-C: ... uH

If I am not mistaken, you would find the A-B or B-C inductances are nearly identical with each other and about 1/4 times as much as the single coil inductance on the other nail
and the A-C inductance is about 3.7-3.9 times as much as the single coils inductance on the other mail.

I uploaded your drawing a bit edited for the letters and I placed a dot for indicating the coils phases.

rgds,  Gyula

EDIT Sorry but I mistyped the above sentence in bold:  I wanted to write: as that of any single one coil in the bifilar coils  and also the inductance between A-C is about the same as the single coil's inductance on the other nail.
For instance if A-B= 30uH then B-C is also 30uH and A-C is about 3.8*30=114uH.  And then the single coil on the other nail is also about 114-120uH.  Hope this makes it all clear.

Sorry for my mistype.

starcruiser

Quote from: FatBird on June 09, 2010, 08:44:27 AM
DimaWari,  Thanks for the GREAT post.

Does anyone have any idea what's in the Blue Box with the Big White Insulators on it?

Thanks.

A MOT
Regards,

Carl

vrand

Quote from: hartiberlin on June 09, 2010, 04:43:57 AM
Jean Louis posted a link to a simple
experiment with 2 nail electromagnets:

http://www.tesla-coil-builder.com/bifilar_electromagnet.htm

The question is, if the ohmic resistance of both electromagnet coils
are the same, why does the bifilar wound nail coil
have more B-field ?

Is this due to the switch on stray capacitance higher
switch-on current or why does this nail have more magnetism then ?

Regards, Stefan.

Maybe that is were the "extra energy" is coming from.  Maybe tapping the Tesla Longitudinal energy?

That Coil windings could be the key needed to be able to successfully replicate the Kapanadze device, vs. just lots of joules into the ground.

That Tesla site also had other Tesla coil designs, such as the "Pancake Coil".

Flat Spiral Secondary and Longitudinal Waves Experiment
http://www.tesla-coil-builder.com/FlatSpiralSecondaryLongitudinal.htm

Still lots of unknown variables on how Jean Louis replicated the Kapanadze design.

Regards

vrand

Quote from: vrand on June 09, 2010, 11:48:24 AM
Maybe that is were the "extra energy" is coming from.  Maybe tapping the Tesla Longitudinal energy?

That A windings could be the key needed to be able to successfully replicate the Kapanadze device, vs. just lots of joules into the ground.

That Tesla site also had other Tesla coil designs, such as the "Pancake Coil".

Flat Spiral Secondary and Longitudinal Waves Experiment
http://www.tesla-coil-builder.com/FlatSpiralSecondaryLongitudinal.htm

Still lots of unknown variables on how Jean Louis replicated the Kapanadze design.

Regards

More speculation, since Jean Louis referenced that Tesla Bifilar coil url.    ;D

He is very familar with bifilar coils and used them in his TEP Project 13 yrs ago.

The Time Energy Pump project

http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/tepcoil.htm

Maybe Bifilar Coils is one of the keys to make this work?

Regards

gyulasun

Quote from: vrand on June 09, 2010, 11:48:24 AM
...snip
http://www.tesla-coil-builder.com/bifilar_electromagnet.htm
Maybe that is were the "extra energy" is coming from. 
...snip

Hi,

The problem is that there is no extra energy from that bifilar electromagnet, unfortunately. 

See this link for serially connected coils mutual inductance.
http://www.electronics-tutorials.ws/inductor/series-inductors.html

The bifilar coil as shown and connected and compared to a single coil in this link http://www.tesla-coil-builder.com/bifilar_electromagnet.htm cannot have extra energy.  You start with a 100 turns single coil, then you make a 2 x 50 turns bifilar coil pair to a similar core and connect the bifilar pair in series, you would have the same inductance as the single 100 turns coil, hence the flux for both types of electromagnets are the same.

I tried to explain this in my earlier post but I had to edit it later because I mistyped a sentence. I hope it is now clear.

rgds,  Gyula