Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 205 Guests are viewing this topic.

baroutologos

This is not totaly stupid. It has a reasonable ground. Really.

Kapanadze discovered (if real) how to produce free energy. When asked by a Reporter, how he find out that, he said humbly, it is Tesla's discovery actually. (Kapanadze said that, see video geo.avi and translation)

So Kapanadze re-discovered the Teslean "wheel" basing his research upon Tesla's. Doing what most of us would naturally do, and muriads have done in the past (it is said), went for a vague patent -got it-, and tried to strike a deal with a (Turkish) company in order to mass produce devices and earn some legitimate profit. After all he deserved it. Besides, Tesla himself was master of Patents -despite his noble motives- that they brought him a fortune and finance his career.

Since Kapanadze so far has miserably failed even to prove that what he has is real, not to speak about getting the "licence" from the small and big interests to allow him to mass produce a device like this, then he should consider seriously at giving the tech to the people freely and enjoy some moderate benefits at first as fame, money from donations and even a photo in the People Magazine. :)

....
What i can guess, is that he will persist in his secrecy and protection of his "Tesla secret", and die with it.
We cannot actually expect a real Kapagen in the decades to come from companies as BP or Shell or Ford or General Electric etc

ps: If a genius man like Kapanadze has managed to read some Tesla and found the Holy Grail in his back-yard lab, then rest assure that the High Tech labs of modern world have found everything about OU.

Question: Why they do not say it clearly and stick to old dogmas?
Answer: Why the Batican still exists? 

exnihiloest

Quote from: romerouk on July 11, 2010, 11:03:59 AM
@exnihiloest
Don't judge what you don't understand.
Because things are so simple doesn't mean that won't work.
Kapanadze got so far mainly because he has a different view.
Personally I have a lot of respect for this guy.

I judge because I understand.
You believe because you don't understand.


ramset

Ex Man

What part of this do you understand?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKPrGxB1Kzc

It can be done !!  [over unity]

Different media ,similar results.

No stone left unturned!!

Chet
Whats for yah ne're go bye yah
Thanks Grandma

romerouk

Quote from: exnihiloest on July 12, 2010, 07:11:11 AM
I judge because I understand.
You believe because you don't understand.
according to what you say this world is divided in two: the ones who understand (clever ones) and the ones who don't (s.....) :)

exnihiloest

Quote from: hartiberlin on July 11, 2010, 08:00:08 AM
Well, I agree, that the document is not much of a help,
but please do your critique a bit more nicely,
but don´t let your frustation show and don´t hammer on others.
Many thanks for your understanding.

It was a founded criticism of a paper lying outside of any science. My criticism would have been "a bit more nicely" if the paper had been a bit less dishonest.
This group is named "The International Open Source Free Energy Research Forum".
"Research" and "open" implies also criticism. And when falseness is at stake, severe warnings are required, it is not a question of frustration.
I can't apologize on that point and if necessary I prefer to be censored.