Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 595 Guests are viewing this topic.

quarktoo

Quote from: Herger on January 21, 2011, 12:53:55 AM
I haven't followed Kapanadze for a long time and need to catch up.

Has Cosmo posted any diagrams or just ideas?
Any luck getting Kapanadze to disclose?  Anymore info from him?

As I recall the old device had two grounds and the later one had no ground.  Did he ever say how he got rid of the ground?

Looking over the last few posts.  I don't see how he had 1 million interruptions with a spark gap.  Even ones with exotic gasses are not that fast.  Was he talking about using the gap like an arc transmitter? 

Never heard of using a magnetic gas before except for that magnegas web site.  Doesn't he make that from arcing in sewage?  The early Kapanadze device looks pretty crude to have a gas core.  It has a wire through the core (a tube?) to ground.

Santilli is the name you are thinking about and yes, that is what he uses for feed stock.

Meyer claimed to use water and I know for a fact that O1 is a polar atom.

You don't need a ground.  Look at a enlarged photo of Meyer's - 2 prong plug

Hubbard used a rotary distributor cap and a HV gen for his HV pulser.

penno64

hi all,

If someone would be kind enough to translate what the guys are demonstrating from that same
video, about the same device (under the cardboard), when he uses the clamp meter.

It appears as 36A to the negative of battery, but only 8A on white wire.

I would really appreciate knowing what he says.


Kind Regards, Penno


quarktoo

Anyway, That was my diatribe on this device. I think there a bunch of people that are claiming replication but have fallen for some disinfo. If it works, you will have no problem keeping your battery charged and lots of extra power and I have not seen that happen yet except from the inventor.

You need the arc to create a shockwave which is a cavitation / sound shockwave along with voltage to produce Aharonov Bohm oscillations is my guess. Frank could tell you which video / paper he discusses that wave circumference spot on the tractor wheel formula that takes you to 1.093MHZ or so.

Good luck with that, and if you think I am wrong, have a second look at all those devices. Look for what is inside the power coil on a real working device. Therein probably lies the secret to this device as well.

khabe

Quote from: penno64 on January 21, 2011, 01:57:47 AM
hi all,
If someone would be kind enough to translate what the guys are demonstrating from that same
video, about the same device (under the cardboard), when he uses the clamp meter.
It appears as 36A to the negative of battery, but only 8A on white wire.
I would really appreciate knowing what he says.
Kind Regards, Penno


Shortly he speaks:
" ... thinner wires comes from battery , black is "minus" ((collective) ground), this wire goes back" (shows to white wire) ...
"Coefficient we have 1.3 ... 1.4 , crudely speaking 40% of power will be taken to here ..." (not understandable - whither?)
"I measure DC current ... 36A are expenses" ( measured on the "minus" wire) ...
when tries white wire, there is 8.2A ... " but eight amperes is coming back ... broadly speaking one-third part of is returning ... goes for charging batteries"
"in principle we are making a new one,where will be used modern electronics, where the coefficient will be two times and more" ...
"I want to give heed about why right now this coefficient is a little bid low ... this current inverter gives triangle impulses ... triangular impulses are not good for induction coils ... because this is not so good ..."
...
So what  ???
By my opinion there is no OU effect at all, batteries will be unloaded in any case  :D
Wonder what the bally "chinese math" he uses to determine the efficiency  ???
"Expenses" are 36 amperes, 8.2 amperes come back and he is getting efficient like 1.3 ... 1.4  :o
It looks like that is why nothing hearable abot this device anymore  :-\

Oh dear ...  ::)

cheers,
khabe

khabe

A little bid difficult to understand for me because accent, but this guy makes good explanations about many things, including from where comes erring results of measurings  ::)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7S22cJ_aF9M&feature=related,
This guy has very many good lectures by *nptelhrd*
My opinion is that СÑ,епанов did delude himself, all electric meters and  powermeters,
Not deliberately, as I understand.

cheers,
khabe