Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[xenomorphlabs]

Hey core

You may be right.  Don Smiths setup was neat and easy to follow. Im just making a connection with what Don was saying about adjusting the output with a resistor.

My lil neon transformer can light the 4w 110v bulb directly. The transformers output is about 1kv, but when the bulb is connected, that voltage probably falls to somewhere in the 120v region, as per the bulb was at full normal brightness as compared to normal input to the bulb.  But in Dons setup, 8kv out, my lil bulb isnt enough to load that down like lil neon, and I suspect my bulb would have its last flash.  But add a resistor of proper value in series with my bulb, and she will light properly. I never really understood what he was saying till now.

But we also have to remember that Kaps device is regenerative. That will be an important part of what he is doing to understand as of how.  ;]

Mags

Magluvin,
Are you talking about the 5 part YT Smith video where he draws a circuit on a
paper-board, where he talks about a resistor across the output transformer?
I have put an open question in a few Don Smith-related forums about this
resistor-tuning issue and have not seen anyone being able to explain it.
It was also posted here : http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7679.msg234480#msg234480

Smith states there that he uses a resistor to "correct" the frequency of a driven circuit ?! The frequency is dominated by what comes in on the secondary coil and will be across that resistor at any time no matter what value the resistor has.
At least to my understanding of it, which i am more than willing to rethink.

It has been mentioned before that TK spark gap may be an 'overload' device.

Core, the 2nd spark gap is only visible in the demonstration linked to on the first page of this thread (and NOT in the green box video btw).
If you observe the spark frequency of it, it comes to attention that it is discharging in irregular intervals, which points to a corrective (maybe overload)  functionality.

Whether the spark gap in the green box video is for overload protection only, can only be answered with certainty once (if ever) the whole circuit is revealed by TK.

Do you have more pictures of that turkey demonstration by TMZ?
This much clearer picture explains a lot more than the blurry video.

[exnihiloest]

@Pirate88179

Even though a measurement alters what is measured, the QM formalism goes well beyond simple "guess", "postulate" or "estimate". It gives a quantified boundary of the measurement, relative to its probability. Thefore it is testable and it has been tested and checked. It is not fuzzy.

And with SR and GR, we are far from QM. Not one experiment among hundreds done to challenge the relativity, gave results differing from relativity.
For example, nuclear reactions support E=MC², as well as the decrease of the deviation by an electric field, of a beam of relativistic electrons in a vacuum, due to their increasing apparent mass viewed from a referential at rest.
There are also historical proofs, as the calculation of the perihelion of Mercury's orbit, that Newton mechanics failed to take into account.
The time dilatation due to speed is confirmed by the increase of the disintegration time of unstable radioactive elements when at relativistic speeds.
The time dilatation due to gravity is confirmed by the correction of the GPS clocks according to GR, avoiding an increasing error of 10 mtr/hour for the position.
Relativity is also fully compatible with classical electromagnetism. To dismiss the first one implies that the second is wrong.
And so on.

So, if relativity is not complete, it is at the fringe, like the GR incompatibility with QM, certainly not about E=MC². We must also reckon that relativity didn't dismiss Newton's mechanics. It has just reduced its domain of validity (low speeds, not too strong gravity fields). In the same manner, we can hold relativity for a solid relevant theory and only subtle phenomena could restrict its domain of validity (without invalidating it). We have not yet one of them.

[xenomorphlabs]

After a closer look at the turkey demo photo uploaded by core, the connections
of the elements are easier to trace.
The spark gaps seem to be connected to the neutral line of the thick cable.
The brown wires seem to be the phases and it looks like they are taken off
the inner elements.

[Magluvin]

Magluvin,
Are you talking about the 5 part YT Smith video where he draws a circuit on a
paper-board, where he talks about a resistor across the output transformer?
I have put an open question in a few Don Smith-related forums about this
resistor-tuning issue and have not seen anyone being able to explain it.
It was also posted here : http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=7679.msg234480#msg234480

Smith states there that he uses a resistor to "correct" the frequency of a driven circuit ?! The frequency is dominated by what comes in on the secondary coil and will be across that resistor at any time no matter what value the resistor has.
At least to my understanding of it, which i am more than willing to rethink.


Core, the 2nd spark gap is only visible in the demonstration linked to on the first page of this thread (and NOT in the green box video btw).
If you observe the spark frequency of it, it comes to attention that it is discharging in irregular intervals, which points to a corrective (maybe overload)  functionality.

Whether the spark gap in the green box video is for overload protection only, can only be answered with certainty once (if ever) the whole circuit is revealed by TK.

Do you have more pictures of that turkey demonstration by TMZ?
This much clearer picture explains a lot more than the blurry video.

Hey Xeno
You are right, he did claim the resistor was used to change the freq.  I had not seen the vid in a year. But I sorta felt he was not fully being straight with some of what he was explaining. I remember watching it a few times, and a bit of it sounded as if he didnt exactly know(but did) some things. Playing a lil dumb. As if to not fully disclose real details at the time.
But I am sorta stuck on the belief that the resistor would be more of a load or impedance matching device rather than a freq adjusting device. I just couldnt see freq adjusting properties of the resistor as per where it was in the circuit as he explained. And as for light bulbs, mine work well at around 45khz, so why freq adjust? He wasnt running anything other than lights.    Unless someone could explain that better to me.  =]   Im alway willing to hear.


Mags

[freshcutgrass]

US color codes

http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=132740&page=11

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_wiring

Effect of resistance on LC circuits is standard circuit theory.  Judging by the number and quality of your posts, you guys are more than smart enough to find this and work out if/when Smith is deliberately introducing little but crucial errors to sidetrack the casual observer.