Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[TheCell]

<Problem is matching the excess power into a load. Usually requires multiplex dump cap switching within blank space period.>
Can you draw a appropriate circuit. Imho in witts motor-gen device , that powers a few lamps, the generator is a resonant tank circuit;you can see the caps at the left side of the gen. 'blank space period' : is this the max amps or max volts moment?

[Choose username]

@4q

It is a bit strange why sy expend his time to make a fake vids, scematics, etc.

Of course it created not especially. People spend time for real research, but maybe somebody is tired of despair and wishful thinking. Stresses, etc... They have full table of details and components, and shooting of fake is a five-minutes-case. But there may be many other reasons why people do fakes, i dont know

to provocate the forum members here

it just local ex-USSR sandbox and it was intended for local ".RU" users only.

So SR and CosmoLV info about ferro-magnetic-suspension were fake anyway?

SR and Cosmo are totally different persons. SR is Russian, Cosmo lives in Riga city in Latvia. Cosmo dont demonstrated workable device till now. And I think he don't have it. Only theories and assumptions, like other people. He's a great hoaxer and he wants that people thought that he have this OU secret.
SR demonstrated OU, yes. But this is a matter of trust. Most likely it is true than not, because i watched all this from the beginning at skif.biz, read his posts at other forums. This young guy is much more serious.

Info about ferromagnetic susp... What can i say... Info from whom? From Cosmo? Ok. And? Such infos will give you and other people. It seems he has no valuable information now. He is a usual and ordinary researcher like many others. No more.

Info from SR? But he did't give us detailed description of his device. he just suggested that it works ferro-domains inside, which was easily moving by "low-cost" power. But he can't know it reliably. He cant know about real processes inside. Moreover, SR disappeared from the forums for a long time ago and will not help us. However he did not want to do it, and it was his choise. His info is a only his point of view. Possibly faulty.

If I undestand correct there will be sg genuine and real schematic, info, vid in the near future right?

I think it was directed against Cosmo. Right in the next day Cosmo published his long anticipated video as instantaneous response to ALGO. Everyone could see that he has nothing. CosmoLV's vid removed all hoaxes, and people finally calmed down. And most likely ALGO has done it because of him, because Kapanadze don't care  it, i think Now Cosmo is banned at the next-energy.ru and matri-x.ru for his inscrutability, which has already become tedious for all there.

So in near future we can rely on Kapanadze only. Because it looks like reality. Currently I see only 2-3 interesting projects from exUSSR sandbox, but unfortunately no more.

[forest]

imho the best example of ferroresonance is VTA by Floyd Sweet.

[FreeEnergyInfo]

https://sites.google.com/site/socialcapital1/Home/russkiestati/svobodnaa-energia

[stivep]

Thank you bolt. I guess you may have a working system now but why keep the secret for yourself if so easy to make a one?
OK. Everything tends to clear why a "kicking" is so important (SM).
I just thinking about why ferrites are better than a normal FE core transformer. The so called "resonance" frequency determine the usable layer of the core material surface. Due to the magnetic skin effect in higher frequencies determine the working intersection of the core that will be smaller so the induced extra magnetic flux smaller also which affects the output. This is why uMetals are better in MEG.

Let me summarize the first steps experiment a ferromagnetic type OU device. Please correct me sy if I am wrong or complete me.

1.) Take a ferromagnetic core, higher permeability is better. Higher diameter is better (due to magnetic skin effect), so the rings are good cos the useful flux will appears at the surface of the core anyway.

Wesley:
This paper responds to more scientific approach than some of the responders may expect but I hope someone will find it helpful

There is no such thing as  magnetic skin effect ferrite core at low frequency.
Most  of information in TK or SR concept may be placed in region of 0 to 1MHz

but

In a ferrite core at high frequency, the magnetic field produced by the eddy current and displacement current due to the electrical field will shield the magnetic flux from the inner portion of the core cross-section. This results in a flux skin effect analogous to the skin effect in the conductors of winding.

skin effect in the silicon-iron cores.- It is found that with the increase of the conductivity and permeability the magnetic skin effect becomes more significant.
That is not so very good . If we have  high conductivity and permeability
we have bad quality ferrite or soft iron ferrite.
So if we need this kind of response for TK project than you guys will know how to apply that knowledge.

source:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304885300004145

some more is in
http://www.qmp-powders.com/rtecontent/document/2001/GC_NO01.pdf
but  do not analyze it ..just take  chapter:conclusions and Abstract  and Introduction

In order to "amplify" skin effect you can electrolytically or mechanically than add silver coating to ferrite ring.

If you have to use temperature as a tool ( say you just dump ring in to  liquid silver ( make sure ferrite was first cleaned in proper solvent)

example of silver plating of ferrite is here:
Measurement of Electromagnetic Parameters and FDTD Modeling of Ferrite Cores
http://web.mst.edu/~marinak/files/My_publications/Papers/IEEE_EMC_2009_Jianfeng_published.pdf


If you need to know how ferrite behaves in high  temperature please view
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zg8V9XCgIqs
related,but, not limited to - Ferroelectric capacitor


"Ferrite cores
are molded from a mixture of metallic oxide powders such that certainiron atoms in the cubic crystal of magnetite (ferrous ferrite) are replaced by other metal atoms, suchas Mn and Zn, to form manganese zinc ferrite, or by Ni and Zn to form nickel zinc ferrite.Manganese zinc ferrite is the material most commercially available and is used in devices operating below 1.5 MHz.Nickel zinc ferrites are used mainly for filter applicationsabove that frequency. They resemble ceramic materials in pro-duction processes and physical properties. The electrical resistivities correspond to those of semiconductors, being at least 1 million times those of metals. Magnetic permeability
(m 0- "miu") may be as high as 10,000. The Curie point is quite low, how-ever, in the range 100 to 300°
C. Saturation flux density is generally below 5000 G (Fig. 4-12). Ferrite materials are available in several compositions which, through processing,can improve one or two magnetic parameters (magnetic induction, permeability, low hysteresis loss, Curie tempera-ture) at the expense of the other parameters. The materials are fabricated into shapes such as toroids; E, U, and I cores;beads; and self-shielding pot cores. Ferrite cores find use in filter applications up to 1.0 MHz, high-frequency power transformers operating at 10 to 100 kHz, pulse transformer delay lines, adjustable-air-gap inductors, filters used in high-frequency electronic circuits"

Well for skin effect you need much higher frequencies and statement from above is old and should be updated Ferrite work at frequencies up to 1GHz
Sufficient information about the grain of the ferrite versus response should be find in link below (4-44 SECTION FOUR.)

for those interested in laminated cores please go to section :(4.2.7 Materials for Laminated Cores)
source:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/55292472/7/High-Frequency-Materials-Applications

Eddy-Current Losses
Ferrite magnetic material are characterized as having relatively high magnetic permeability (in the range of 2000 to 10,000 times that of free space), and medium levels of saturation ï¬,ux density (on the order of 20% that of iron).
http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/public/etd-543273119623370/etd.pdf
2.5.2 page 27.

2.) Make a coil1 around that, in full of length, this will be the excitation coil pulsated with HV DC pulses.

My suggestion is that after applying silver coating when cut around the core
a.so the core will have two ends
b.than you solder copper wires to it.
will serve as primary winding.

concept of one wind only was picket up by you audience numerous time
B. Solenoid with ferrite rod core
To model inductors as part of a complex system some
simplifications are necessary  to reduce complexity of the
structures. One common simplification for wound
components is the reduction of the number of turns to a solid
copper tube. The copper tube has the outer dimensions of the
winding and the current around the tube is the current of the
inductor times the number of turns in order to generate the
same field strength.
Fig. 4: Solenoid as test object and as PEEC model with current directions
added
page 1666
http://www.stefan-peter-weber.de/publikationen/pesc05.pdf



Major disadvantage of such concept is that  silver coil has much higher  self resonance  point and as such  will require LC network to trim to desired frequency.
But it is not me who proposed skin effect that would be susceptible to Eddy Current

3.) Determine the required HV for core saturation by adjusting the SG (higher voltage spikes = more magnetic energy in coil1) . The frequency of sparks in SG will be the output frequency of the device?! With a small p.magnet or scope the saturation point can be easily determined.

I have problem with understanding this part.

At first what is that we are looking for?
If we stay that rapid pulse make rapid response than one way of manifestating of presence of this tension is
Flexural vibrations induced in thin metal wires carrying high currents
http://iopscience.iop.org/0022-3727/34/10/315
or:
another words if the copper wire jumps under influence of rapidly elevated electrons to  a higher orbit around nuclei than all of the associated phenomena will be excited in correlated manner.Including response of ferrite core.
Ferrite core will react by rapid switching of magnetic domains.
by the way you can hear to this clicking sound of magnetic domains by winding on the ferrite core few winds and connecting  that coil to amplifier.. than rapidly inserting  magnet or just turning magnet you are causing domains to switch.
Is that energy? Yes it is response to influence so if we do not have to pay for this influential activity than we  will have OU.

If we want no BEMF than  we should understand what kind of opposing factors we are dealing with in general:

19.8 Electrical Resistivity of Metals

The resistivity then depends on collisions. Quantum mechanics tells us that electrons behave like waves. One of the effects of this is that electrons do not scatter from a perfect lattice. They scatter by defects, which can be:

atoms displaced by lattice vibrations
vacancies and interstitials
dislocations, grain boundaries
impurities
http://www.virginia.edu/bohr/mse209/chapter19.htm
or
read behavior of exited electrons at the molecular level.
http://www.chemguide.co.uk/atoms/properties/atomorbs.html#top

There is another one I found to be very interesting and easy to understand.
RATIO OF ELECTRON CHARGE TO MASS (e/m) LAB
http://groups.physics.northwestern.edu/lab/eoverm.pdf



It is like you my friend trying, to test device that was not build  as of yet
nothing wrong in it. HP tried to do the same. But only reason they did that is   for someone to pay for toy to play with but I like the concept:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gr6CjSds1-4


If we want to couple to unknown sorce of energy than at first start to eliminate what is known
http://www.gigahertz-solutions.com/media/pages/onlineshop/pdf/en/product_overview
From that table we can see that only natural source of energy is Natural  Harmonics= 2KHz

Than try to imagine coupling method
The link below is not the one that may help but from philosophical perspective it represents mechanism of thinking. However there is something catching my attention when I look at figure 4( Figure 4: Flux  flow due to PM translator)
and imagine piece of ferrite( or say another magnet) under influence and in between of two other magnetic fields.

"4.  Finite element  model
4.1  Introduction
A 2 D  axisymmetric finite element (FE) model o f  the machine
was  developed  using  commercial  software  [lo]. Figure  4
shows the flux produced by the tubular PM translator. The FE
model was  used  to determine  flux  linkage data  for  induced
emf  and inductance calculations.

Figure 4: page:864  on the right hand side of the page.
http://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/20104/1/getPDF.pdf

Than I would  ask you the question
1.Are you trying to increase magnetic flux by means of increasing SG voltage?
I so than
What frequency,what voltage and what shape of the signal, you likely to apply.?
For resonance circuit based on ferrite there is no difference  if you have 2Hz or 100Khz ,
but
Analyzing lightning strike you dealing with DC HV and you are able to listen to frequencies from very low to very high say 28MHz on your receiver.
One may ask how is that possible? By definition of DC there are no harmonic components.
But there is the catch.
Lightning strike is DC impulse without offset.
Scientific discussion I have had turns out to conclusion.
Rising  very sharp impulse from  0 to  infinity is the source of harmonics.
Is that  another source of energy? Yes it is. Free of charge.
If you can hear it that means that your receiver is picking energy to antenna.
Well this is not  what we are looking for with TK investigation.

If you want saturation point you will get it at any possible frequency..
So it is not what we want.
We Want:
Resonance that gives us maximum power transfer and any possible way of canceling BEMF

4.) Make a modulation coil2 around a part of section of the core. This will modulate the "core" when the saturation happens. Apply a sinus? or someting waveform to the modulation coil ...

This part is interesting but what is that you try to achieve by applying modulation and what  modulation you think may likely give you desired effect?
AM,FM,PM, PWM,A1,A2,(A3a.b.c.j), CW?

5.) Make an output coil3 (bi-tri-filar is better?) on the other part of section of the core. This will be the output coil, connect to a direct a load or if using diodes or graetz bridge a low frequency near sinus will be resulted after filtering without HF part which freq equals (+- the modulation freq) the SG spark freq.

Again Can you draw circuit you think will likely be suggested by you?
What each step or option give you as a benefit?

Questions:
1.) Does a permanent magnet flux pre-tension applied to the core helps to achieve the saturation or kills the "effect"?

That is what I try to find related to fig 4 of above text (philosophical approach  of)"Finite element  model"

2.) What would be the 3rd phase? (above just a HV kicking + modulation used)

I do not understand this question.Are you asking what would be when you
get to this point thinking what to do next?

Anyway  as a RF engineer I say it is very same as a mixer in RF technology but it is not an electronic but magnetic mixing. Two frequencies applied to a nonlinear (core makes nonlinear by saturation) medium core (e.g. a diode in RF) and the resulting two of new output frequencies (f0+f1 and f0-f1) will be appear at the output. But the question of OU remains open, where is it come from?

That part is interesting

Suggestion:1.1 BARKHAUSEN NOISE BACKGROUND

1.1.2 Excitation Field
1.1.3 Magnetisation
1.1.4 Gain
1.1.5 Sensor
1.1.6 Irreversibility
With magnetic types of inspection and phenomenon there is an aspect that one frequently encounters.  The aspect of irreversibility is displayed in a ferromagnetic material’s inability to return to the original magnetic state.  In other words, once a ferromagnetic material has been placed in a magnetic field and taken from the field, there will remain in the material some amount of residual magnetism.  This characteristic occurs on the order of the individual magnetic domains within a material, thus causing a very unrepeatable transition when the magnetic field is changing within a material

Device to listen to clicking magnetic domain  noise is at  Page 8
1.1.14 Barkhausen Noise Inspection Equipment
This is probably the simplest way to control magnetic response of ferromagnetic material in TK device experiments

http://www.insight-ndt.com/papers/technical/t013.pdf

Barkhausen Noise was discovered in 1919 by H. Barkhausen when he wound a
ferromagnetic specimen with a wire and hooked it to an external speaker.  He found that by changing the magnetic field around the specimen, he could induce a rushing sound in the speaker.  This rushing sound was the result of many small abrupt changes in magnetic flux that was occurring within the confines of the coil.  These step variations in magnetic flux occur randomly and are what is commonly known as Barkhausn Noise. 

thank you for your  post.

Wesley