Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 206 Guests are viewing this topic.

AbbaRue

Awesome video!  Just what we needed! 
Now we should start getting some replications soon!

  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A7jbUA6_10c 

And to bring both videos into one place here is the other video, with details on winding Cad. Coil.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GlaYj7J5s8 

Thankyou Team!

AbbaRue

In the video, when you connected the amp. meter.
When you  set the scale on 0.5 A you were getting 150 mA not 15mA.
So your input power was 34 Watts not 3.4 Watts.

ramset

e2matrix
This is the kind of work that we need more of here!!
Thank you sir
Beautiful job!!
I have been slowly posting info over here


http://www.overunityresearch.com/index.php?topic=1149.msg18425;topicseen#msg18425


Not so crowded


Chet


e2Matrix Quote




Thanks to all contributing here.  I converted the Tuning Instructions into a PDF to make it more universally available to everyone.

TunningInstructions.pdf (22.61 kB - downloaded 47 times.)
Whats for yah ne're go bye yah
Thanks Grandma

stivep

Quote from: AbbaRue on November 27, 2011, 02:43:17 PM
In the video, when you connected the amp. meter.
When you  set the scale on 0.5 A you were getting 150 mA not 15mA.
So your input power was 34 Watts not 3.4 Watts.


15ma stands  for power consumption at listed below condition Sir.
The power supply is bipolar power supply that gives 5 v only out when is not under  load .
At the output board  ( printed board) you see very small  green transformer  on that printed board
This is output transformer.

When under load than this power supply= 16.8khz generator adjust voltage by itself.
Please note that two fan (ventilator) are rated 12V 1.1A  = 13.2W and because we have 2 of them that is 26.4W.


Now how much difference do you have? based on your calculation


AbbaRue ??? ??? ?


34 Watts - 26.4W. = 7.6W
This is your mathematics  Sir. :)
and in the effect we have 100W light bulb under load :)


Take out from 7.6W  rest of electronics usage inside power supply and you come to less than 3W








Or you do calculation my way:



(The problem with data is that was not displayed in the easy to understand format.)


We found that fan are not required at all.
I have device in my lab.
I need to find the time and deliver you  video that will stay about power consumption under load.
In my video
you  see spark  shorting input with no load representing caduceus present.
So please try to short your power supply   by sparking on it HOW MUCH  TIME IT WILL SURVIVE?
but surprisingly our power supply with that small transformer did not get affected by that.


Very important is to notice!!!!!!
All of the comments of mine are related to my video.
videos of Arunas show  more but  you can clearly see energy consumption under real load as well.


compare  power  consumption with spark and with no spark.
I did my job now  you do yours.
:)


That what counts SIR   AbbaRue :)


Another words  it is not important how much money you have initially  but how much money you have spend for operation.
We have showed you max the worse scenario of shorting power supply using HV flyback and how much the difference would be.


PLEASE do not confuse that we are dealing with two devices one is operated from two small generators ( deflection  yoke)  Please forget about it  for the moment.


We are  talking about  the one that uses caduceus coil.


For these who  still have problem with it I'm going to use example:
15 years old skinny girl wants to run 1 mile so she is using x amount of energy from initially  available energy of the body. Her  energy consumption is 3% of energy  of her body.


or


You have 200 liters of water but you need to use only 3% of that water...


or another example..
You use X  amount of  energy to  carry on  15 years old girl. Than in addition to that she decided to take with her 1 book of encyclopedia Britannica 7kg.

How much energy was used to carry on  that book?


:)


O boy... :) That book is consumption of our device.... that is all :)
Forget how much energy is used by  carrier( he could always be replaced by small boy 10 years old, who can  carry on 7 kg book only using the same amount of Jules as the big one.)


We can always drop the girl she is not needed and not important at all.
:)

So why you count initial energy consumption and you do not count:
energy difference between initial energy consumption and energy consumption under load of spark?


Do  your math  and tell me what is the difference.
THAT WOULD BE YOUR ENERGY CONSUMPTION  
understand?
yes?
no?
maybe?
you do not know?











When on my video we show current without the spark and current with the spark
THE CURRENT INDICATOR ALMOST DID NOT MOVE  I ASSUME WE HAVE BEN DEALING WITH
LESS THAN 3 W IN REAL MEASUREMENT WHERE IMPEDANCE OF CADUCEUS WAS PRESENT that would  decrease current even more...

SHORTING SPARK..was the most we could draw from power supply.


SO PLEASE CHECK IT OUT. :)


Wesley




and what will be damaging current?

John M

Quote from: jbignes5 on November 27, 2011, 01:04:02 PM

I believe they initially had success but in the event that the ferrite was becoming a magnet it was loosing it's ability to switch off. Iron would totally fill this bill. When I find the name of this iron Tesla gave Westinghouse we will be on the money. I bet silicon Iron would be the best? The odd thing is Tesla said this was foreign iron from Italy or somewhere like that and that it was soft Iron.


Any radiation from the iron would mean resistance in the iron. This needs to be heat-sinked with an aluminum case. We want to contain the vortex and the current will flow through the motor. we can also tailor the receiver coils to the shape of the vortex. Resonance must also be included in the geometry of this coil to field relation and might include a Rodin type geometry relation to the fields.


Don't waste you time on people who don't grasp the effects we are playing with here. They will never understand this process unfortunately and will always attack it. It's better to keep the course and slowly learn from your mistakes.


The core was at fault plain and simple. Once it heated up the material started to become ferromagnetic. No problem. Now take that effect and apply it to iron which is less permanent. With layering you can add a capacitance to the core.  Although for basic study Tesla said it was ok to use solid cores. They still worked.

I believe iron might worked better than ferrite too. Ferrite is better at higher frequencies. I don't know enough yet, so I will be open minded and try both.

John