Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[jbignes5]

I think also that it needs to be biased or polarized across a flow. This increases the resolution of the gap. Preconditioned polarized flow across the spark gap. This will shape the charges in a teardrop shape in increase the gap between them expanding them. Loosen the bond of them and they want to fly apart. This is akin to the universe speeding up or accelerating Universe theories. With outer space being near but not quite full expansion. kinda like a density of it.


I just thought that if we could see the magnetic field it would look rather unique. In actuality it is like watching Saturn or Jupiter. Jupiter being the best example of mass energy flows and vortex's. You can learn a lot about the finer rules by looking at rather big processes in our Universe.  Vortex's can move massive amounts of space just like it was in water. All the rules of bodies in a fluid and surfaces work well. I have a small picture holder with my most loved ones faces in an aligator clip. The bottom is a square cube of plastic filled with oil and water. There is a heart floating on the bottom layer and submerged into the top layer. One is the positive and the other is the conductor or neutral channel. The top has more density because it is filled with energy or swirls attached. It can also be likened to the picture taking process when we had films. An inverted picture of reality. A void of energy.


This is also why the space probes that look at gamma rays see two bulbs on either side of the galactic plane. It all transmits on the surface and the probe is looking down the plane of that surface with a reflection of the top energy on that surface. The surface is really a huge sphere but the point a view is but only a sliver of that sphere. This sliver is a slice or surface of that sphere based on our view point. We only see a mere 1 degree of the sphere. Well as best as I can see it.

[Osiakosia]

To Mr Kelly and to King
Please post my instruction to myself as informational ,educational material in the book
People that provided successful experiments are
Arunas Lithuanian from England
Aidas Lithuanian from Lithuania
Wesley from NY USA

The person who first  start to experiment with "Ferrite Yoke is
Tiger from Kazakhstan
Tiger  conformed our experiment as valid one.
Tiger has number of successful experiments done  in this area but he never explain it to the extend we did.
Tiger might of have English language problems But I did not get across his instructive videos before the date of our experiment .
Most of material of Tiger was presented in form black box.
none of his material was provided as step by step process.





If it  was me than:

I should not concentrate on particular frequencies but on the process by itself.
This frequencies will not work for me as every ferrite  and  every winding will vary .
I have used  chain of steps to make it happened.


1.I have connected to 15 winds sweeping generator( does not matter  that could be 50 winds as well but 15 winds is easier)


2.on "U" shape I have connected spectrum analyzer ( computer driven is OK as well, model  is given on video)


3. I found specific pick on more than 1.MHz on spectrum analyzer It is visible - the highest amplitude.
lets call it F1


4. I than disconnected sweeping  generator at 15 winds and disconnected spectrum analyzer at "U"


5.I have connected exactly frequency of response at "U" that means ( frequency F1) from generator


6. Than I connected spectrum analyzer at 50 winds and was looking for biggest response But excluding  frequency F1.

7.Than when I found that frequency lets call it F2. (say 375kHz or so)...But even amplitude  no ringing signal!!!
I disconnected generator from "U"

8. I connected  generator tuned to F2 to 50 winds winding.(no big difference  I can connect it  first to 15 winds as well to see  response
but than  voltages on bifilar will be much higher sometime it helps)
If I use 15 winds instead 50 winds to find max response on bifilar I make sure that I have no ringing pattern at bifilar.
And Than I must reconnect  generator from 15 winds to 50 winds with the same frequency and vary this frequency to adjust tuning.



9. than I connect oscilloscope (or  small light bulb at first.) to bifilar winding (at oscilloscope  I should see no ringing on bifilar for that particular signal)
10.than I look at highest amplitude possible to achieve  still being sinusoidal and no ringing - at  bifilar winding
I was - careful HV may damage my equipment ( if the voltage is to high than  voltage divider  or right probe must be connected to oscilloscope)
I  was varying F2 left   right for the best results

11.Than I connect 50 Hz from another generator( this is  modulating frequency)and heaving still first  generator connected to 50 winds)

12.Than I vary 50Hz left /right for the best results.(In my case that was 47Hz)

13. I Connect the stronger light bulb and or light bulb if I have  had no light bulb connected before.. ( playing with smaller light bulb
from the beginning of my measurement at bifilar gives me advantage of heaving lower voltage at  bifilar.)

14. I re-tune F1 and F2 to the best light from light bulb. At this point I should have already 150W

15. I than  spark  from Flyback to "U" wind
15a. I need to keep in mind that by  applying spark from flyback (from old TV ) I induce much higher voltages
at 15 winds and 50 winds  so these generators  are in danger to be damaged. The generators need protective buffer !!!!!!

16 I should be able to get around 1 KW out of bifilar.By connecting stronger and stronger chain of light bulb I can check it out.

17. I should keep in mind that ferrite yoke from old TV may change  resonance frequency
at U shape winding with time and if I have had
only generator operating  to max of 2MHz than
I would not be able to  play with new frequency of response over that rane so  heaving
Generators that goes to more than that is critical.!!!!
!7a. I should keep in mind that It might be much higher frequency of response than 2 MHz at the beginning  of
as different ferrite has different material properties.
17b. I should keep in mind that it would be good to scan  ferrite yoke to say 50MHz or more to see what interesting might of  be there.

17c. I should keep in mind that not every ferrite may work as it is related to
ferrite material from yoke.I may try to cut in halves big ring ferrites and see if that effect
was related to material only or maybe to material SHAPE say Conical shape.


17d. I should keep in mind that strange  effects might of happened
including extreme, unknown and enormously strong   (but  suspected by me) EM field and NOT ONLY.!!!!
That might or might not affect my health. (never scientifically conformed)


I BLAME SHAPE THAT MEANS SPECIFIC GEOMETRY OF THE FERRITE  YOKE ( CONICAL SHAPE.- GRADUALLY BEND AND CIRCULARLY
PROGRESSING  ) FOR THE ADDITIONAL PHENOMENA IF ANY SHOULD  BE PRESENT 


This may lead also to something that is much bigger and much more important than OU I'm looking  for.
as a hint- "I found  few articles  and experiments ,standing about time being affected )
From scientific  approach i have never tried nor conformed nor tend to believe in that he he he
You know what I really think,

!7e.I should keep in mind that application for additional phenomena if any might  lead me to unpredictable application including weaponry.
17f.I should keep in mind that application for additional phenomena  should be at peaceful nature and that my work is directed to  benefit of humanity ONLY!!!!!!!! 

17g. Please keep in mind that thin paper divider should be present  to interrupt magnetic flux between two halves of ferrite  from TV deflection yoke

This is my most complex instruction to myself ever made.



Legal note : Please notice that all of my comments are in form of
I connect
I measure
I than 


and so on....
This is my steps to myself directed as a memo only...
I have some of progress in my English skills  so:
If I ever used anywhere and in any form of expression  world "You" that must be understand as" me" and "me" only.





Please fallow my safety notes
Never do it ,never play with it.
I represent myself only and  nobody else.
I do not take responsibility for anybody action.
I gave this information public as educational material only.
I'm in within the group of voluntaries,there is no head of that group and group does not have any leadership or any particular
agenda other than being fascinated  with science. 


Addition to Legal Note:


Any of my comments from the past and/or present and in the future[/font][/size]

in regards to wording used should be understand as my comments only and/or directly attached to safety notes of mine.[/font][/size]

Any comments that might sound as encouragement or invitation or advertisement or in any other form [/font][/size]

should be understand as in line with safety notes.[/font][/size]

The reason for confusion as how to understand my comments is that I was not born American and English is not primary language.Therefore I experience language problem and proper format of expression problem. [/font][/size]


I express opinion of mine and nobody else based on my USA Constitutional Rights [/font][/size]

I'm not responsible for my opinion expressed in anyplace, as I might not fully understand wording that I have used to express myself.[/font][/size]


To write part LEGAL NOTE I have used help of  fellow who I think understand English better than me.
USA is country of emigrants and based on Constitution we are allowed to express our self to the best of our ability



End of legal note.




Wesley


Please read in between the words.


term:"read in between the words." means all comas and ,(,),., and symbols of that nature [size=78%][/font][/size][/size]


heeeeee


term "heeeeee"

means my good lough and I have constitutional rights to express myself and/or lough as response to

any emotion of mine .That "heeeeee" is not associated with any of this topic.

Dear Stivep ,
Please see my U shape coil . Did I connect correctly the ends of this coil ?
Today I tryed to connect generator to whole Yoke system and received ferite
response then put sweep frequency to 15 turns coil and saw the response on U shape
coil .
Must the ends of U coil be connected at the end ? 

[wattsup]

Must the ends of U coil be connected at the end ?

@Osiakosia

Two wires in, with the jumper wire on the other side. That looks OK to me.

@All

I just wanted to get this second diagram (below) out here as a second alternative for the yoke coil. I know this one departs form the original yoke wind of 1T, 15T and 50T versus 150T. This design marries the Caducues Coil (CC) design to the yoke core. This way you can have two CCs, one per yoke half, with again two output coils. Putting these two yokes together will create mutual CC to CC transfers and build up the output stage to double the amperage.

@ronotte

Maybe by playing with the spark gap distance this will provide a little bit more adjustment to replace the need for the variable capacitor. When the WNY guys did the first video they used a fixed vacuum spark gap so they could not adjust the spark gap distance hence the need for the variable capacitor. Also be sure your output diode is working OK because they can become ruined with excess HV. I have two that are blown already.

wattsup

Added: Here is an image of my broken flyback HV coil just to show how thin the wire is.

[garrypm]

Can anyone remember the youtube showing how to wind a caduceus coil.

Not sure if it was the guy who was going to disclose all back in june

Thanks, Garry

Found it  -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cjr7pDXsmkg

[wattsup]

@All

I know for some this may all sound irrelevant, but the flyback will be the biggest hindrance once this device has all been resolved. How to get the right flyback will be the main problem for many. In an effort to investigate this, I decided to take a standard flyback and try to get to the internal diodes.

So I took a heat gun and started melting off the flat area of the FBT that is supposed to hold the diodes. Once the first layer was scrapped off hot, I started using a small screwdriver and a pair of pliers as a hammer to slowly chisel away at the plastic molding which was rather friable. In the first image you can see the start of this slow process but I made a big mistake. I should have taken off the ferrite core. You can see the core has cracked in two places and I also show the core spacer which is a small twisted wire that makes the gap between the core halves.

The second image is a grab of the TV schematic diagram I found for this FBT which is a CTC 167. Whatever is in the dotted square is localized in the FBT. I numbered a HV output resistor and the three diodes.

In the third image you can see that the plastic molded it now removed and I have numbered the resistor and diodes.

This type of standard flyback topology does present some hope that a means of removing the unwanted components from a standard flyback could be quickly accomplished if one was to make a straight cut along the sidewall of the coil. You would probably need to practice on the first one or two but eventually this could be a possible method of producing the right type of flyback transformer from existing inventories.

wattsup