Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[yfree]

@All

Analysing Kapanadze devices, including the latest 200W (Wesley), one comes to the conclusion that the most probable mode of their operation is: initiate oscillations in a coil, wait for increase in oscillations amplitude ("trumpet" shaped, as pointed by T-1000) and then harvest the increased oscillations. In the attached schematic (based mostly on the 200W device), S1 initiates the oscillations in L2 with a short HV pulse or a burst of pulses applied to L1. It is extremely important that both switches, S1 and S2, are off after this initiation, so as not to load the L2 coil in any way. When the amplitude of oscillations is high enough, switch S2 connects the load through L3, thus harvesting the energy of L2 into the load, and, at the same time quenching the oscillations. Then, switch S2 is turned off and the process can start anew. S1 and S2 can be implemented as spark-gaps in the first approximation (STAAR device) and the harvesting point can be S or even T, with G grounded. Kapanadze might have used a spark-gap between points T and G for safety. Implementations can vary, but the main mode "initiate, wait for increase in amplitude (without any loading!) and then harvest energy", seems to be universal (Kapanadze, Smith and possibly Mark).
Continuous excitation (Kacher)  is not applicable to this scheme, as it constantly loads (disturbs) the coil. In the same approach, continuously connected load prevents amplitude increase in L2, thus there is no gain. Let us think of that ...

[jbignes5]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVSCA0z8ZjM&feature=related


This is a great understanding of what we are up against.

[skaarj]

Guys... long time ago I read about the "Linden experiment". Picture here - http://energy21.freeservers.com/cgi-bin/i/linden.gif - google does the rest. I do not wish to go off topic about the main device where this horse-shoe-magnet-device is used. Just a question:  can this so-called "effect" be in any help to the yoke and kapanadze devices? Until the PCGU/PCSU will arrive here, I asked a few companies in Europe for custom made horse shoe magnets - all answers were almost the same: NO.

I wonder what happens if the yoke core (or ferite core) is replaced with such strong magnet, then HV pulses are discharged.
any ideas?

[Hope]

I can not accept that a coil (Rodin) being 62% MORE efficient than ANY coil ever designed can not be of MAJOR benefit to our project.  AND the bifilar coil's properties as well being much needed in the obtaining of the most efficient circuit working toward using the forces of nature (which is what we are TRYING to do).  My design thoughts are this:  Rodin for extracting and or adding constriction of the fields (making diode action in copper and/or aluminum)..Bifilar coil(s) used for all their properties of containment/division.  Coil peak shorting, magnetic focused spark gaps.  Shielding that acts to buck back and keep containment and focus of electrical/magnetic properties.  These alone should be enough to make complete cycles of the expansive forces and the contractive nulls.  It's like this fluid flow has use of what can be thought of as electrical gravity, the nulls being compressible a bit and the excited expansive not compressible (or to a much less extent).

This does not even include the extra loose heat shed from decaying elements thru natural or man made nuclear magnetic resonance.
What are the differences of these magnetic verses static charges and field movements?  I know, I know ...also of what is taught being a electrical engineer...BUT what those relationships have to do with what we are finding and are NOT taught is going to make all the difference.

How do we master life's known forces?   We have learned as children by using our senses to manipulate our surrounding.  Then it would stand to reason that we need to SENSE these other unseen forces in that we might be enabled to master them.  Perhaps our efforts should not be limited to the final achievement of what we call free energy.  But also to first  include the steps of SENSING these forces and thus making them subject to our efforts as we do when working with wind, water, fire...etc.   I want feedback from everyone and this includes you all as to tap the group mind on this subject.  It is not my intention to derail this fine topic but to enable it further with all the expedience it deserves.  For some reason we have skipped this step of making our unseen forces sensible.  If the moderator wishes to place this into a new topic for discussion so be it.  But until we bring these unseen things into the light of sensibility we are groping in the dark. 

edited of correctness (if possible) at least cohesiveness.

[From other Planet]

interesting new RomeroUK schematic: http://underservice.org/index.php?topic=121.120#msg737

@Romero if u here: I have problems registering at your Forum, email activation links only take me to your start page but wont activate my account?
Ah and could you share values of C1 and C2 u use? would be really nice

thanks,
main