Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[T-1000]

 
Indeed. Simple spark gap is an energy multiplier. Read amperage AFTER the spark gap.In ambient air one ballstic electron emmitted from cathode during his way to anode (accelerated by an electric fied) liberates 10 exp7 electron-ion pars. Electrons are moving towards anode quicker than slow ions, so there is this extra charge separation.To avoid recombination a strong magnetic field is applied between spark gap electrodes.It is called electron avalanche and goes like nuclear chain reaction.

Regards,
pix
Another way is Philo Farnsworth multipactor, every photon multiplier works this way.

Please see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1u22JFshjI
Easy to try when you have 2 flyback transformers, only you need to put them and spark gap into resonance...

[baroutologos]

Please see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A1u22JFshjI
Easy to try when you have 2 flyback transformers, only you need to put them and spark gap into resonance...

That video means nothing.. the DMM reading the HF current means nothing also. T1000 not everybody here is a noob concerning electronics.

My advice is be of real value istead of keeping this thread 'hot'.

[verpies]

I hope you had a nice vacation but nothing interesting here, no reliable measured output greater than input or selfrunners.
Only some people claiming they have OU and some of them also claiming they can do it in different ways

Thanks for the quick summary.

I am continuously puzzled how is it possible to claim OU without reliable measurements of the I/O power or the I/O energy (or a selfrunner).

After all, sparking, heating, shining, buzzing, hissing, spinning, moving mass, etc... is not an evidence of OU.

P.S.
On my vacation I was amazed how amazed people could be by a clever demonstration of spinning an unloaded efficient 1kW brushless motor by a single AA battery.

[verpies]

There has been a lot of posts regarding the use of iron wire, possibly used inside the copper tubing primary. It has been more focused on why the device works rather then just what to do to duplicate the Kapanadze device.
Personally I hope it stays focused on why it works.

There are two approaches to scientfic investigations:
1) From the specific to general (the experimenter's route)
2) From the general to the specific (the theoretician's route)

Both approaches are valid but it is hard to discover new phenomena just with reasoning without experimentation.
The second route allows the construction of many functional devices once the general operating principles are correctly identified.
You apparently area proponent of the second route.

I prefer using the first one in order to arrive at the general operating principles and then engineer working devices using the second route.

[T-1000]

That video means nothing.. the DMM reading the HF current means nothing also. T1000 not everybody here is a noob concerning electronics.

My advice is be of real value istead of keeping this thread 'hot'.

Try to think out of the box:
If there is same or less power out, how much power is needed to do same thing? Then you can ask the author of this video for measurements on how much power load takes when it is plugged in (not counting standby circuit consumption). Or.. build same circuit yourself and measure it (the parts price will be under 50$, i am sure).