Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[27Bubba]

franz , Thank you for your effort but the text cannot be read, at least by me. Maybe bigger letters or different font color?

Still, your efforts are applauded. Thanks.

[dllabarre]

I did. Maybe is not perfect, but.... ;-)

Thank you.
I can read what you typed by zooming in.

DonL

[wattsup]

@wattsup

It is possible what you saying but, IMHO the bearing outer profile is either casting or plasma/torch cut with machined bore hole for the bearing. Having spend the entire life in machine tool industry running machine shop I can promise you there is not enough space for the ball bearing, v-belt pulley and spacers...
My 2¢
Forgot to mention the cover "A" . The cover is used to not only trap the bearing in place, it also protect the bearing from dust/ junk
if those are not sealed bearings (cheaper bearings usually exposed)

@27Bubba

Thanks for your comments.

Let me please retract the fake part. It is not fake if and when it works.

I guess it is better to consider that it actually could work but not the way he wants you to think it works. For the potential investor, he wants them to believe a shaft coil is turning that flywheel, while I am convinced it is really via a hidden drive motor via one or two pulleys. His means are smart but of course since the investor (man with hands in pocket???) may not have invested yet of course he does not want anyone to realize how it really works.

Looking at the gear up ratios of the wheel pulley (C) to generator pulley (D), compared to the possible diameter of the pulleys inside the wheel bearings (B), I'd guess under the wheel and hidden inside that metal box he has a 3600 rpm 1/2hp to 3/4hp AC or DC motor with a dual-ended shaft each end with a pulley (A) having a diameter of 1/3 to 1/2 of the one in the top wheel pulley (B). I'd say the bearing pulley (B) has a diameter 30% - 50% greater then the pulley (C) that goes to the gen.

I remember many years ago a old engineer told me that in such dual flywheels, the best design is two triangular shapes pointing to each other. Hmmmm. This is more like a Chas type device then he wants us to see.

Sorry for jumping the gun on the fake thing. This is the problem with all we see  from TK. Yes it could be faked, but yes, it could be real as well. In this case, if it is real, he really took great pains for you not to realize the true makings of the system. I guess he and SM went to the same Patent Cloaking School. lol

So we keep on.

wattsup

[d3x0r]

@27Bubba

Thanks for your comments.

Let me please retract the fake part. It is not fake if and when it works.

I guess it is better to consider that it actually could work but not the way he wants you to think it works. For the potential investor, he wants them to believe a shaft coil is turning that flywheel, while I am convinced it is really via a hidden drive motor via one or two pulleys. His means are smart but of course since the investor (man with hands in pocket???) may not have invested yet of course he does not want anyone to realize how it really works.

Laplace Rail, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnry9pdysqA, Lorentz Motor, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nERQQl7KlHc, both of these demonstrate you can have a rotatary motion with no magnets.  But that recent video of the telsa unipolar induction motor, there may be coils in the boxes under the rotor bearing supports; they may be large permanent magnets, and utilize a large homopolar charge, but there's no brushes under the rotors.  The toriod isn't completely wound?  Is there a notch on the end with a position magnet? 

[John M]

John M and doubters.       Tarial clearly shows his devices selfrunning from 200 Watts to 35 Kwatts so how can you say not OU ? He tried so hard to show devises in plastic box, How do you hide batteries in plastic box. I have seen a dozen devices all different with different components, some run bulbs some run motors (Island device). It seems a lot of trouble over a lot of years to fake something, so keep experimenting.
Regards
Keith

Keith - Those are really good question and I did not say it wasn't Over Unity. There are good arguments on both sides. Wesley witnessed in person a demonstration. I don't think I would be able to fool him with a OU device that was not. If it is for real, I would think we would see more solid replications. I am keeping my hopes up and experimenting myself.
John