Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 95 Guests are viewing this topic.

FreeEnergyInfo

KAPANADZE MECHANIC FULL CIRCUIT ....


www.freeenergylt.narod2.ru/kapanadze_4/

wattsup

@ronotte

OK, there is only one thing left that is not clear and I need it to be clear before I turn on any power and risk again blowing stuff.

In your opto-circuit the TB1-1 as you say goes to my primary and across the primary I will have a 4000uf or so capacitor and a 0.1uf capacitor. Both will be going across the primary. The other side of the primary goes to a separate battery positive.

So from what I understand of pin 2 and 6 having an isolated power input has to be separate from the power going to the coil. If I have battery #1 supplying the 6N137 and IRF7307 and the negative goes through the IRF840 source and drain to go to the primary, and, if after the primary I go to battery #2, where does the negative of battery #2 go? I am guessing it goes to the negative of battery #1 that is pin 6. But if that is the case, then how if pins 2 and 6 isolated? It is isolated from the FG pins 3-4, OK, but the flyback from the primary will still hit pin 6. Hmmmmmmm.

I made a diagram below to show my dilemma in case this explanation is confusing.

wattsup

Added;

OK, I made a second diagram adding in where I think may be a good landing point for the battery #2 negative.

By cutting at the X point and putting the battery #2 negative on the mosfet side.

This way the only only link between the opto-circuit and the IRF840 would be the gate hence isolating the FG, the opt-circuit and the drive mosfet.

Is this OK?




jbignes5

 I had a chance to read the entire book of Nikola Tesla - The Inventions and Writings of Nikola Tesla... A very enlightening book.


In chapter XXIV if you look at page 114 you will see Exactly what Wess and Kapanadze are doing.


http://www.scribd.com/doc/25989337/Nikola-Tesla-The-Inventions-Researches-and-Writings-of-Nikola-Tesla


For your enjoyment and enlightenment I have linked the entire book for you guys. It shows the exact setup but instead of a solid core Tesla used iron wire that had been annealed and oxidized for insulation purposes.

This book also talks about regular ac versus disruptive discharges. The two are very different and he tried to describe the differences and how to use them each. Also he talks about the disruptive discharges and that they need to be converted down into a form that can be used by regular equipment like motors and such.

Farmhand

Hi jbignes5, I think you refer to figure 95 and 96 on page 114 and 115 of the PDF. That I think is simply a constant current transformer
which should be just as efficient with no load as with a full load if correctly designed as he states.
However I think the result is different to what many people might think. I think the result is that even with
no load the setup will use full input power and with a dead short the input power remains the same.
If that is the case there is nothing free there. This is a similar situation that tricks a lot of people I think,
when they see a transformer with a certain idle input ( usually much more input at idle than an efficient transformer)
then when that transformer is slightly loaded no current increase is seen or even a drop in current, however the problem
is that there is a limit to the maximum power output which is in my opinion always less than the input. Thane does a similar thing.
They never show the transformer powering significant loads because they can't. By significant I mean hundreds of watts.

By securing a difference in phase the secondary cannot put energy back to the primary either. As far as I can tell anyway.

Constant current at all loads means the current will not change even at short circuit which means only a certain amount
of power can be drawn and I think that is the purpose of the design. The voltage will change though I imagine.
With no load all input is wasted.

Cheers

Edited: corrected figure number

P.S. and now after reading a bit more I see it is used ( as far as I can tell)  to get a phase difference of 90 degrees so that
together with the utility currents they can run a motor.

..