Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[forest]

Last attempt to cover over the truth of Kapanadze device?

Anyway, interesting stuff so far. Here a few more things to consider:

1) All hidden electronic equipment should fit in a round tin can with approx. 13cm diameter and 10cm height
2) The precision of the circuitry should match the (non-existent) precision of the 2004 coil
3) No high-tech parts, the circuit arrangement is most likely build out of junk parts from age old consumer electronics
4) There are no magnets at or near the spark gaps visible in Kapanadze videos
5) Neither the spark gap nor the helical coil have parallel-connected capacitors
6) There is nothing visible to electronically fine-adjust anything

My next realizations I have come to:

Changing the spark frequency slightly changes the amplitude of the resonating wave, but not dramatically. My clearest resonance is currently around 170KHz.

When I connect my oscilloscope to the bifilar secondary coil, then I get the waveform as shown in the previous image. But this is only true when the ground of the test probe is connected to the opposite side of the exciter coil (left side in Kapanadze 2004 setup), when I reverse the connection the amplitude of the resonating wave goes to minimum.

When the amplitude of the wave is high, touching the exciter coil reduces the amplitude. When the amplitude of the wave is low (+ and - reversed), touching the exciter coil increases the amplitude (but not to unreversed level).

My oscilloscope has no earth connection (have cut it on the power cable), hence what causes the different measurements? The metallic mass (shielding, housing) of the oscilloscope perhaps? Could this be the searched Kapanadze effect? If so, how to get power out of this effect?

Regards

Before you end up with frustration and anger watch again all TK videos pause frequently and ask yourself why is something happening like presented.... We dismiss some important tips and tend to think own (sometimes complicated) path

[energia9]

a video will not be enough for replication....
for a replication you will need proper understanding of the way it works.
however donald smith lies, he is right about one thing.  several tuned tesla coils will be excited near the tuned sender.
however they will not duplicate energy..
but if you are taking power from them it will not affect input to sender.
which logically is the key to kapanadze,
as a condensed energy which not react upon the source can be added with primary energy because the sender does not notice energy taken from it, the energy is conserved on nearby objects and in earth if no pickup coils are used, energy is not in the dimension anymore which can affect sender, making the output greater .. . .
Thanks to the capacitor this is possible.   a condensed energy will not react on the system but add additional energy to it.

This will only work only with electrostatic energy. 
many describe this very simple operating principle
they all say its dead simple and most guys cant get it right because they think its that hard!
in fact..... DONT THINK..
In one of the videos Donald Smith showed a copper and an aluminium plate,  he showed how can he draw a spark from it and he showed this so to show you there is no disturbance on the input to the sender coil
This is it.
very simple.!
this man also confirms it  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tu84y83_AYg



nmr or whatever complex waves you guys are talking about makes no sense
they will not attract special anomaly , nor bifiliar caduceus or whatever ,  just because they have parasitic capacitances they dont mean to have higher energy outputs or whatever.
everybody is a bit naive and never research on facts.
dont fight with me,
you will realise sooner or later that your time is WASTED if you are not thinking simply and logically.

peace

[verpies]

No it is good for nothing.

Hey, I merely mentioned them - this was not a complete instruction how to use RF amplifiers in this application.

CB or Ham Radio amplifier is tuned based on  swithible   "pi" filters.
Each of them  has a certain bandwidth.

You are correct.
...bit my complete instructions of using these amplifiers would include cutting out the output filter and connecting a load impedance matching RF transformer directly to G or H or A or AB output stage.

With the A or G class amplifiers there is no crossover distortion, hence linearity is good enough at the cost of big heatsinks in the A class.  The operating frequency of the transisors in these amps extends into 100MHz and they are perfectly capable of amplifying signals in the 5Mhz, 50W regime.  I remind you that the Yoke device used much less RF input power than that.
Furthermore, amplifying fast rectangular pulses, often is sufficient, making the sine waveform amplification linearity of the AB and H calsses - relatively unimportant.

Doing the above is good for something  because these amplifiers, albeit not perfect, are mass produced and cheap - cheaper than e.g.: $300 PA107U_F integrated circuit, alone.

[Shokac]

a video will not be enough for replication....
for a replication you will need proper understanding of the way it works.
however donald smith lies, he is right about one thing.  several tuned tesla coils will be excited near the tuned sender.
however they will not duplicate energy..
but if you are taking power from them it will not affect input to sender.
which logically is the key to kapanadze,
as a condensed energy which not react upon the source can be added with primary energy because the sender does not notice energy taken from it, the energy is conserved on nearby objects and in earth if no pickup coils are used, energy is not in the dimension anymore which can affect sender, making the output greater .. . .
Thanks to the capacitor this is possible.   a condensed energy will not react on the system but add additional energy to it.

This will only work only with electrostatic energy. 
many describe this very simple operating principle
they all say its dead simple and most guys cant get it right because they think its that hard!
in fact..... DONT THINK..
In one of the videos Donald Smith showed a copper and an aluminium plate,  he showed how can he draw a spark from it and he showed this so to show you there is no disturbance on the input to the sender coil
This is it.
very simple.!
this man also confirms it  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tu84y83_AYg



nmr or whatever complex waves you guys are talking about makes no sense
they will not attract special anomaly , nor bifiliar caduceus or whatever ,  just because they have parasitic capacitances they dont mean to have higher energy outputs or whatever.
everybody is a bit naive and never research on facts.
dont fight with me,
you will realise sooner or later that your time is WASTED if you are not thinking simply and logically.

peace

I agree with you

[verpies]

Nature of the spark  is unstable and impedance is uncertain, frequency response is unstable and wide.
The good is that it is us who push spark to respond at certain frequency
In practice  we need to automatically adjust gap to keep it steady or manufacture spark gap for the specific frequency of response ( bandwidth)

Yes - for an uncontrolled spark. That's is why spark gaps have been obsoleted by RF transistors and tubes in HF RF output stages.  I am not a proponent of spark switching but I respond to others here that are.

For those - sparks can be controlled via various triggering schemes like in Flash Tubes without varying the spark gap's distance.