Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[energia9]

The capacitors on battery react in same way as capacitors near Tesla coil. So high voltage spikes there too I guess.
Also when you use ferrite please be careful, it is quite easy to cause NMR in it with katcher and field surrounding coils on 90 degrees when you put ferrite in coil on horizontal position inside of grounding choke near vertical Tesla coil.
If you would like to make intentional cause, wind selenoid transformer on ferrite and put HV capacitor with spark gap then connect wire inside of ferrite core over length of selenoid. Then see how transformer consumed current drops when spark gap fires...

Cheers!

i dont exactly understand how you mean it
But recently i did an experiment where my current dropped by 150 miliampers and my lightbulb glowed brighter.

I was winding directly on to 2 pieces of ferrite in the middle,  the ferrites had gap between.
the current drops and light increases only if the two ferrites are in right place and the coil is shorted.

The ferrite also heats up very much..
i dont know what is going on but somebody may explain

[jbignes5]

 This is the NMR they are talking about. Whenever you use ferrite or iron it slows down the frequency and increases the magnetic portion. Both ferrite and iron convert to magnetic. You know it is NMR because the ferrite or iron gets very very hot because it is resisting the movement of the field within the main coil. Any use of a core besides copper or aluminum is a no go situation. Try copper or aluminum instead of the ferrite of iron. Each metal reacts in a very different way. Copper is current based and aluminum is voltage based. If you are using a high voltage field then use aluminum as the core. If you are using a heavy current field or want to convert to a very heavy current then use copper core.


Iron or ferrite must only be used to convert to the magnetic spectrum like in motors. Remember it acts like a sponge and condenser for the magnetic portion. This I suspect is a transformation from electric to magnetic.

This brings me to the real experiment I wanted to try. Copper inside of aluminum! So copper core inside of aluminum sheath. This could also be done via pipes. My experiments will be of different weights of each and you could slide one inside of the other to see what effects this will cause. Added* Make sure they have a slit in the tube to make a one turn coil. If you do the hook up points must be from one corner to the opposite corner(commonly called kitty corner) to be able to use the one turn properly. Let me be clear about this if the tube is verticle then hook from upper left of slit to lower right of slit. This will pickup better or even transmit better that way.. Could hooking up the pipe in different directions change the outcome? Like in on upper left to in on upper right with the corrisponding lower change as well to keep the turn right.

The standing potentials of aluminum is -1.67 and copper is +.34. This would create a diode of 2.01 volts by itself. With the energizing field this might be a boon.

My point here is to create a battery with the electrolyte being the electric field that we are getting. This ties in with my work on crystal batteries. It is the same concept but with zero galvanic response because even though the metals are connected via the electric field they are not physically connect at all hence zero galvanic damage to the metals but still has a battery like effect.

I have been working on another avenue as well with a kind of insulation that is active. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyvinylidene_fluoride

This is also very interesting. Read the first paragraph... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferroelectric_polymers

[itsu]

@ T1000,

thanks for the warning, i noticed no frequency change when "tuning" with the ferrite just an increase in the voltage as can be seen on the scope in the video.
The 2e part of your post i will have to read some more times to understand what you mean   


@ Jbignes5,

I have fixed the link in my post, thanks

The reason for the ceramic caps on the battery is to minimize the RF on its terminals so i can take reliable input power measurements in the DC range when needed.

I will try a 1 turn primary, thanks.

I can try copper and/or aluminium pipes in the coil, will let you know.
I think there is aluminium foil in the motor start/run caps, the micro oven caps have an aluminium casing.

Concerning the used kacher setup, please take a look at one of my earlier videos where i explain
this setup:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wjS7yPmb8o&list=UUdJ2A-075yx9y4bKqu_8Q8A&index=10&feature=plcp

Only difference is the transistor which presently is a MJE3055T, the primairy coil which is 2 turns, and the copper pipe (12 cm long) as a pickup coil inside the kacher.

I have used some metal as a (virtual) ground attached to the open coil end, but that only degrades the performance, one item was a bronze lamp pedestal about 25cm diameter, but i will try some aluminium too.

No strange effect noticed when the kacher coil is operating

Sorry for the telegram like style, but i like to keep my posts small.

Regards Itsu

[FreeEnergyInfo]

FREE ENERGY ??? ??

http://www.001-lab.com/001lab/index.php?topic=639.msg47203#msg47203

www.youtube.com/watch?v=nf4DKt94938

[jbignes5]

@ T1000,

thanks for the warning, i noticed no frequency change when "tuning" with the ferrite just an increase in the voltage as can be seen on the scope in the video.
The 2e part of your post i will have to read some more times to understand what you mean   


@ Jbignes5,

I have fixed the link in my post, thanks

The reason for the ceramic caps on the battery is to minimize the RF on its terminals so i can take reliable input power measurements in the DC range when needed.

I will try a 1 turn primary, thanks.

I can try copper and/or aluminium pipes in the coil, will let you know.
I think there is aluminium foil in the motor start/run caps, the micro oven caps have an aluminium casing.

Concerning the used kacher setup, please take a look at one of my earlier videos where i explain
this setup:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wjS7yPmb8o&list=UUdJ2A-075yx9y4bKqu_8Q8A&index=10&feature=plcp

Only difference is the transistor which presently is a MJE3055T, the primairy coil which is 2 turns, and the copper pipe (12 cm long) as a pickup coil inside the kacher.

I have used some metal as a (virtual) ground attached to the open coil end, but that only degrades the performance, one item was a bronze lamp pedestal about 25cm diameter, but i will try some aluminium too.

No strange effect noticed when the kacher coil is operating

Sorry for the telegram like style, but i like to keep my posts small.

Regards Itsu

The reason I suggested the 1 turn is because of the hairpin circuit. Strange nodes will pop up on the turn which I think having the inner coil so close tends to mirror. Having 2 winds lowers the ability for it to turn those nodes. If you need more Surface area just parallel the wires. This will also lower the resistance and allow a greater flow to happen. Just keep them perfectly on top one of another. The more you add the bigger the bang will be. Bifilar is another method but then you need two to lower the resistance so I wouldn't bother with bifilar right now. It is much easier to just parallel those thick wires. But remember this is gonna lower the resistance of the path and your transistor might fry. I might also add that you use coax like cable coax to connect to the 1 turn. The only thing you need to do is cut the shield and let it be a floating ground shield. This will keep the emissions from the 1 turn in the wire till it gets to the 1 turn. You might want to move the katcher away from the batteries or statically shield them as well.. This might be what those metal boxes are in the Turky  Kapandze videos are for. To protect the circuits and batteries. You might be able to have the batteries in the shield and take the caps off entirely from the batteries.


I'm glad to hear there is no strange effects on you. That makes me feel safer about this tech then. Tesla said that he could go as high as 88 million cycles a second and get extreme performance out of this system. The faster it goes the better the output or more pressure. We are merely scraping the surface of this tech at 1.2 million...


The copper or aluminum termination might have to be used when we start going higher in frequencies. I'm not sure. Telsa's oscillator was very advanced and did not have any iron in it at all. This was to let it run as fast as possible. But remember also that this field changes the resistance of anything in it. It might even go into the negative side, again this is something I have not tested yet..


Also please don't apologize for short responses. Any response is better then nothing.

Hmm Tesla says to use thick stranded wire for the primary.

http://www.teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla-article-high-frequency-oscillators-for-electro-therapeutic-and-other-purposes?start=130

I know it says electrotherapy but just read it anyways. It has a lot of good stuff in there.