Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[v8karlo]

Capacitive coil patent:
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:N-xUR2S4xsYJ:www.overunity.com/11063/simulation-of-the-muller-dynamo/dlattach/attach/54455/+&hl=en&gl=uk&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESgZr95GM2cl2bvPlcbKA-GzRsorZwsj9SL1k7kkqMYbbHb5s_IvZRbXnBJRUeIJvIQzwsX9pdzsPsKEk4eD7iiQQiSuMydltnIHToCqwtkCyCp7tJH9XZl_b1rvGiiHFoAbq207&sig=AHIEtbSlIG_YtC0Rxgk6VHuIMO2ZBjLWgw

Outstanding..!


I didnt know there is patent on capacitive coil, and those are
for motors. If you wanna get power from them remove that
caps at the ends, they are killing process.

Wound 20 turns bifilar on ferrite rod and connect them like on
schematic below. Results will be more than fine, you'll see.
Lots of Voltage and amps. Another capacitive coil.

For a core I put 10-12 ferrite rings together as rod, and thats it.

Coils doesent have to be wound oposite directions, they can be
plain bifilar, but I wound it like Kapanadze did because I
wanna discover what he is doing, thats the point.

[a.king21]

Hoppy: Yes I agree. But the figures are so outrageously favourable that we've got to look into it, I think.
Even if it's out by half that would still be 3 watts in and 500 watts out.
So it seems very promising.
What I want to avoid however is this business where some people cannot replicate
due to insufficient data:
others cannot, because they don't have the equipment. Then the
nay sayers can come in and everyone gets discouraged.
I've seen replications fail just because of faulty/wrong diodes for instance.
If this is the real deal then it has to be managed "super well".
As an example, I found the term "backfeed" hard to understand at first. I now realise
v8karlo means "feedback"  as in "feedback loop".

[v8karlo]

Karlo, didn't you do that the same what JNAudin did in the 90's: http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/tepv22.htm ?
Your coil setup and pulsing very-very similar for me like Naudin's setup. Please check TEP pages here: http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/scalwidx.htm
4q

I did watch his work, and I respect the man, but he was going
in other way at the time.
I discovered this when I was reading about Marks TPU 3 years ago.
I connected 2 laminated trafo together in that way that second
winding of first trafo is conected to first winding of second trafo.
second winding of second trafo was in the air, no connection.
Then I pulsed first winding of first trafo.
Later I realised that they were connected in capacitive way.

After a while I broke down this to one trafo and connection with
one diode, and after that bifilar windings on rod, .. and so on.

When I was watching old videos from MagnaCoaster, in one video
he was showing scope shots and they were exactly like mine, and
he was filling HV 2 uF cap to 1200V in second or two just like I do.

But something is missing here, they both (TK and Maagna) found a
way to further enhance this and gain lots of amps.

That is my goal, to find what component is missing.
Yesterday I suspected that capacitive coils when operate in the field of
nearby HV strong Capacitor can yield much more amps, but I didnt try that, yet.

They both using capacitive coils, for sure, because its better than
classical induction, and more powerfull.

[v8karlo]

Imagine this,

Only 20 turns bifilar litz from cable on ferrite rod (its a trafo!!)
With change only to freq. and Duty Cycle I was able to
get on output any voltage from 0-2000V and more, and any desired
amperage from 0-max output.

What classical trafo can do that?

[Hoppy]

Hoppy: Yes I agree. But the figures are so outrageously favourable that we've got to look into it, I think.
Even if it's out by half that would still be 3 watts in and 500 watts out.
So it seems very promising.
What I want to avoid however is this business where some people cannot replicate
due to insufficient data:
others cannot, because they don't have the equipment. Then the
nay sayers can come in and everyone gets discouraged.
I've seen replications fail just because of faulty/wrong diodes for instance.
If this is the real deal then it has to be managed "super well".
As an example, I found the term "backfeed" hard to understand at first. I now realise
v8karlo means "feedback"  as in "feedback loop".

As it is clear that a considerable level of power is available from the TK device, no special test equipment should be needed to test replications. An analogue meter can be used to measure the voltage across a load resistor, which in turn can be used to calculate current being taken by the load, assuming that both the waveform and frequency fall within the range of the test meter. Open circuit voltage will vary with load, so its important to log the power curve for a variety of resistances to get a good idea of device performance. If a test meter can be applied directly across the output of a device without its internal fuse rupturing, then clearly there is very little power available from the device for consumption by the load. For test replications to be managed 'super well', its vital that these basic electrical principles are fully understood by the replicators, otherwise the blind could lead the blind!

Hoppy