Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[dole]

Although I can't see any diode in TK setup on the primary side of the transformer, what if TK's blue inverter is broken so it provides only a half wave of 220V/50Hz? Or a half wave of the inverter output is shorted somehow?

You don't need them if you discharge in phase on the AC side.
Probably you can remember principle drawing some years ago.
d.

[a.king21]

The aquarium 2  team can remember nothing about the contents inside  the coil. However I feel the discussions on this forum have made good progress. I can now see a common thread between all of Kapanadze's solid state designs. I am becoming more convinced that the bifilar wound coil (Kapanadze's term - I think they are Caduceus)  is a step down transformer. They are not the coils featured in the patent, in my view. His patent is making more and more sense to me now.

[anandml]

I'm quoting the description from the WIPO application here because it is actually very clear and understandable and explains this interesting circuit well enough to get builders started. I don't know what it has to do with Kapanadze but it's a neat circuit anyway.

I think the "control circuit" CY is probably a function generator making alternating squarewave positive pulses out the two outputs, which can be done simply with an ordinary FG and some easy TTL or CMOS logic. But at what frequency and duty cycle?

ETA: I see from the "figure2" that I am right about the control pulses, and they are 50 percent duty cycle, alternating, positive going square pulses. But..... all I can find is that they should be "at a specified frequency". But I can't find what the specification is. Anybody got any idea? It will help when choosing the other component values and circuit layout.

If anyone knows pls tell me how to make a "control circuit" CY

[wattsup]

@Zeitmaschine

Thanks for posting that patent. Makes perfect sense.

In a normal one transformer primary under AC, half the coil is in top wave while the other half is bottom wave, always switching back and forth. When you put two primaries in series, one primary is now top wave and the other is bottom wave so you are using the complete primary under one change and not two half changes.

It's like pulsing an alternating polarity dc or maybe an H-Bridge pulsing per primary. If each primary now only has to deal with one polarity in its entire wind length, this may of course save on losses. All the above would happen if that diode #1 was not there.

The line diode makes things a bit more drastic and I think the inventor does not even describe it well because there is no mention of a 1/4 wave produced per primary during one side of the AC half wave, because that's what it should be producing.

When the AC feed is on the normal flow side of the diode (1), each primary gets half a wave. But when the AC feed is on the blocking side of the diode, both primaries will only get a total of half a wave giving each a quarter wave, one primary that is going up (then must fall) and the other falling, then going up almost as if it was square wave driven in that one half cycle.

I'll have to try that out when I get back, but I am sure Tinsel may look at that with his scope and all - hehehe.

In the interim, some guys e-mailed me about the triaxial cable I will use to wind the next TK coil. I made a small youtube to show the differences and you will see where I think TK got his shielding ground wire.

I forgot to mention that the texture of the second transparent layer of the triaxial is very close to that of the blue TKc used by TK. When you look close up at the TKc blue wire that is not distorted under the cellophane wrapping, you will notice an erratic surface.

http://youtu.be/37vxQ74OvY4

Don't give up.

wattsup

[Zeitmaschine]

You don't need them if you discharge in phase on the AC side.
Probably you can remember principle drawing some years ago.

The principle drawing(s) that nobody can get to work?

The line diode makes things a bit more drastic and I think the inventor does not even describe it well because there is no mention of a 1/4 wave produced per primary during one side of the AC half wave, because that's what it should be producing.

Could be the inventor does not describe it well because he wants to avoid the term »Perpetuum mobile«.

Allegedly the circuit is for »reducing losses during conversion of AC to DC«.

One transformer is matching the other is step-up. That means there seems to be no step-down of the voltage, only a one to one conversation AC to DC. The normal way to do this is to use a simple diode bridge with capacitor, 220V AC in 310V DC out.

Now I scratch my head: How can a circuit with two transformers and two diode bridges and a diode that blocks half of the input power be more effective than a single diode bridge? What is wrong here?