Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[Farmhand]

Experimentally I measure half the voltage (6V) after connecting both of the (12V) capacitor together.

So if the missing energy is due to radiation because of the current that flows during connection, then why is it that exactly half of the stored energy disappears?

Yes I get the same result just now, about 6 volts in each. Interesting.
I expected losses but I would have thought a bit less losses than that.


Cheers

P.S. Thank you very much Poynt99, that paper is very interesting and informative.
I appreciate the work you put into it. Makes perfect sense.

..

[Zeitmaschine]

Yes I get the same result just now, about 6 volts in each. Interesting.
I expected losses but I would have thought a bit less losses than that.

Now connect the capacitors (with 6V in each) in series, then the voltage is back to 12V but with only half the overall capacity. Hence my question again: Why is the loss during the transfer exactly 50% and not e.g. 35% or 65%?

And another question would be: could this process also work in reverse, so that 50% of the energy in a capacitor appears from nowhere instead disappearing to nowhere?

BTW: A coil is the counterpart of a capacitor. So does this mean if in one coil is (magnetic) energy stored and this coil is connected in parallel to a second coil then there appears 50% of energy from nowhere (instead of disappearing)?

[d3x0r]

Now connect the capacitors (with 6V in each) in series, then the voltage is back to 12V but with only half the overall capacity. Hence my question again: Why is the loss during the transfer exactly 50% and not e.g. 35% or 65%?

And another question would be: could this process also work in reverse, so that 50% of the energy in a capacitor appears from nowhere instead disappearing to nowhere?

Because capacitors in series are 1/c1 + 1/c2 = 2/Ct or in this case (Ctotal)/2 = c1+c2

[verpies]

But the question is, what could be the advantage if the off phase is an arbitrary angle instead of 180 degrees?

For example 90deg. phase-shift can be used to create a rotating magnetic field.
180deg. phase shift - cannot.

For instance: A pulsating linear magnetic field (0deg. or 180deg. phase-shift) will not stimulate NMR in the absence of a perpendicular static magnetic field, however a rotating magnetic field - will.

[jbignes5]

 Yes it is the capacity that we should be looking at. Now remember an open bifilar coil will have perfect separation and have the boosting of voltage via the winds.


Just think about this. In a regular capacitor there is no induction per say. There might be some but not enough to cause this phenomena in full force. Also the type of materials in a capacitor like an electrolytic is aluminum, which has it's own curious events that happen when exposed to rf like fields. In the bifilar cap/coil you can have a perfect effect of both capacitance and a boosting or dampening effect of the inductance (step up(electric) or step down(magnetic)).


I really think my idea about the coil I posted is gonna work very well. With opposing winds and oil dielectric this thing could handle a lot more push. First I will test the new winding method with alternating wires so that each wire is surrounded by the opposite polarity. From what I understand this not only raises the capacitance but also speeds up the pulses. This Cap/Coil should break the speed limit if used as stated with one or two real capacitors to act like the bucket. The cap coil should vibrate the electric field very quickly from side to side. Harnessing this vibration would be as easy as inserting an iron or ferrite rod into the cap/coil with puckup load coil wound on the rod for loading. This is exactly what the other kid did in the video I showed earlier. No effect on the source. Does this mean we can build 3 cap coils and use 2 small ones as source vibration(tank circuit) and one large one as the converter.

Now onto a rather bleak idea here. What if the government decided to alter the bifilar's picture and patent information. This would ruin the operation of how it worked and make the coil look useless in the public and scientific minds. With the open version of the bifilar coil it seems to me to fit the explanation of Tesla in the patent more closely. Maybe this was a ploy of Tesla to hide the true function of the coil as a receiver and amplifier of this natural process.

Tesla also talked about wire not having a definitive capacitance. He always maintained that it varied in time.