Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[jbignes5]

High voltage in oil?

Maybe people have...................then they just quietly disappear from the forum..............


I don't think it could be that some electric companies are using Free Energy technologies already and then sell this Free Energy high priced to clueless people, couldn't it?



Now some interesting crap about transformers:

Marko Rodin coil, Steven Mark TPU, Tom Bearden MEG, Sweet VTA (SQM), Annis&Eberly generator

»Maybe it’s not meant to be for me to build a free energy device, but I would give anything, anything just to see at least one human being that has build a working model based on the shit presented in all these nonsense crap of a book. Just one, that’s all I want, nothing more, nothing less. Just one being that has built a working prototype, and it’s a good compassionate person who will put a video on YouTube, saying to the free energy community: “Hey guys! Check this out! I’ve build a free energy device based on the shit and crap in this bullshit of a book I have found on the web.” ...............That’s all I ask from
God.............. Is it too much???«

Image below: If watched correctly (in parallel viewing) one can see it in 3D.

Yes High voltage in oil. Tesla was the first one to experiment with transformers in oil to extend the range of his dielectric separation. He said if properly done and all air was excluded that the dielectric breakdown would become so high that he could go way beyond a coils natural breakdown in air. And if you payed attention to the very high voltage circuit in oil that I showed you will see the dielectric oil actually moves and flows like something is moving it http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASiQKAsoDs8  This is the evidence we refuse to see. If you have free charges in a dielectric of say air and we find a way to move and extract those charges from the dielectric then we have a perfect way to harvest free energy. Air is a dielectric as well.
If on the other hand you just want to create a movement in the dielectric and strip the charges from that flow all one would need to do is use the proper receiver bifilar that will take any charge no matter if it is positive or negative and suck it into the coil. The bifilar coil is such a beast. It redirects both charges into the coil in a one way fashion gaining inertia in the process. This would also gain in potential difference by the gain in inertia or speed.


The coils the other guy showed were pancake coils but they were the solenoid design and not bifilar. There is a big difference between the two. It seems this man mistaken the regular solenoid in the patent as the special coil, for which it is not. He took the upper coil from Tesla's patent and that is the normal coil. The bottom coil is a much harder coil to wind but it is also 250,000 times stronger and can be used as a capacitor if it is in the open ended design as I showed from the young mans video. So we have two versions of the pancake coil. One is solenoid based and the other is bifilar based. If you read the patent information again about the bifilar you will see that the difference between the two is vast. Tesla explains what the bifilar process does, It amplifies the frequency among many other changes it does. I am on the fence about this but I really think this amplifies the speed of any pulse inputted into the coil. This would of course amplify the energy as well.


If we understand that opposites attract then in the bifilar design the opposite polarities attract each other and speed up the pulses. Any change in this speed also increases the energy of those pulses. Well I don't think anyone has tried to put regular AC into the coil to see what effect it has on the output. We need more experiments to see the effects.


Oh and one more thing. Isn't it funny that TK made a motor with two big flat disks? <Bifilar pancake coils?

[jbignes5]

Now back to the bifilar coil.


"In order to attain my object and to properly increase the capacity of any given coil, I wind it in such way as to secure a greater difference of potential between its adjacent turns or convolutions, and since the energy stored in the coilâ€"considering the latter as a condenser, is proportionate to the square of the potential difference between its adjacent convolutions, *****it is evident that I may in this way secure by a proper disposition of these convolutions a greatly increased capacity for a given increase in potential difference between the turns.*****"


Doesn't this mean that the capacitance is variable depending on the potential difference of each wind???



"Capacity secured in this particular way possesses an additional advantage in that it is evenly distributed, a consideration of the greatest importance in many cases, and the results, both as to efficiency and economy, are the more readily and easily obtained as the ****size of the coils, the potential difference, or frequency of the currents are increased.****"

Hmmm..

[dllabarre]

Zeitmaschine: Ask yourself a question. What would you do if you figured it out today!?
Would you be full of glee  all over the forum with and produce an "instructable"? Would anyone?
It's a sobering thought.

I would have a local friend replicate it first to verify it can be replicated and not a fluke.
This way I can create instructions that are detailed enough for someone new to this type of device to be able to replicate it.
Then I'd post the instructions, parts list and measurements I got.
It would be your responsibility to get the exact same components I used or don't complain if it doesn't work for you.
Eventually I'd sell a kit with the components I used, minus the coils.  You'd still be responsible to wind your own.  Winding coils is a PITA 

I had planned on informing Kapanadze first, before I released my information to the internet, but now I feel he's had plenty of opportunities to take ownership and release his secret.  He obviously isn't going to do it.  So I wouldn't inform him first.

That's my plan anyways,
DonL

[Zeitmaschine]

Why not make a bifilar pancake coil out of aluminum (or copper) foil instead of thin (flat) wire? One layer conducting foil alternates with one layer insulation foil. Then you can have a rolled foil capacitor and a bifilar coil in one piece. Of course it is then not pancaked anymore.

[dllabarre]

"In order to attain my object and to properly increase the capacity of any given coil, I wind it in such way as to secure a greater difference of potential between its adjacent turns or convolutions, and since the energy stored in the coilâ€"considering the latter as a condenser, is proportionate to the square of the potential difference between its adjacent convolutions, *****it is evident that I may in this way secure by a proper disposition of these convolutions a greatly increased capacity for a given increase in potential difference between the turns.*****"

"Capacity secured in this particular way possesses an additional advantage in that it is evenly distributed, a consideration of the greatest importance in many cases, and the results, both as to efficiency and economy, are the more readily and easily obtained as the ****size of the coils, the potential difference, or frequency of the currents are increased.****"

By using large or small wire with thick or thin insulation, wound as Tesla's bifilar design, will increase/decrease the capacitance of the coil also.

DonL