Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[verpies]

So does this mean every radio station is a »Over Unity« device? Still unclear, therefore I will calculate this stuff vice versa:
The input of a medium wave transmitter shall be 85 kilowatt at 50Hz coming from the power station. That's all we have. The output of the headphone (earphone) shall be 50Hz audio sine wave, so the output has the same frequency and waveform as the input.

The transmitter covers an area of 100 square kilometer. That means if the covered area is (most likely) circular then the farthest receiver would be at a distance of just 6 kilometer (round

No it isn't OU.

The short wave transmitter may radiate 85kW of RF power at 2MHz sine wave carrier.
The radiation pattern of the transmitter antenna is a spherical (not a circular), so you must divide the 85kW by the surface area of a sphere, that has a radius equal to the distance between the receiver antenna and the transmitter.

Also, if 50Hz audio sine wave is amplitude modulated on that 2MHz carrier then 1 cycle of that carrier constitutes only 0.0025% Duty Cycle of the 50Hz audio signal.

This means that in order to obtain the power available at the headphone of a crystal radio, you must divide the RF power available at the receiver antenna by 0.0025%.

[Сергей В.]

Дарова Антанс, так держись!!

[Zeitmaschine]

No it isn't OU.

The short wave transmitter may radiate 85kW of RF power at 2MHz sine wave carrier.
The radiation pattern of the transmitter antenna is a spherical (not a circular), so you must divide the 85kW by the surface area of a sphere, that has a radius equal to the distance between the receiver antenna and the transmitter.

100 square kilometer (10 ×10 kilometer) equals a circle with a radius of 5.642 kilometer. A sphere with a radius of 5.642 kilometer has a surface area of 400 square kilometer. Thus if the receiver is 5.642 kilometer away from the transmitter then the initial energy is spread not on 100 square kilometer but on 400 square kilometer. So according to this calculation method it is even 4 times more Over Unity.

Circle And Sphere Area Calculator

Conclusion :  free running tank circuits are overunity and half of patents are about the input/output issues from tank circuits.

Then why are we still here? Maybe I should start making experiments again ...

[forest]

100 square kilometer (10 ×10 kilometer) equals a circle with a radius of 5.642 kilometer. A sphere with a radius of 5.642 kilometer has a surface area of 400 square kilometer. Thus if the receiver is 5.642 kilometer away from the transmitter then the initial energy is spread not on 100 square kilometer but on 400 square kilometer. So according to this calculation method it is even 4 times more Over Unity.

Circle And Sphere Area Calculator
Then why are we still here? Maybe I should start making experiments again ...

http://www.spiritofmaat.com/archive/feb2/feb2_bearden.htm this is the first problem solved , still are two.....

[sparks]

   I'm experimenting with high-voltage ionization of various materials and dumping the high-velocity electrons into a working circuit.  I have been working with a microwave power supply.  I found that a simple modification of the primary drive circuit huge difference in v output for energy invested.   Basic law of induction going on here.  The faster you do something the bigger the response.  Like the problem Henry Ford had with magnetos.  The magneto would store up mechanical power in a spring and then let loose a permanent magnet that swept by a coil very quickly to create a high voltage sine wave to impress on the spark gaps inside a combustion chamber.  The springs would wear out-the heat of the engine would ruin the magnets etc.  Ford went to Tesla the high voltage GURU.  Tesla helped him engineer the ignition coils used even today.  Tesla adhered to Faraday's laws of induction.  The faster you change a magnetic field about a conductor the higher the induced electromotive force.   So in creating your magnetic field change you supply a primary current from a scource.  This rolls the magnetic moments of the atoms in the core steel against the ambient magnetic field force-  and are the springs in the mechanical analogy.  You can ballast this input current so you get some work out of this trigger cocking.  Then pull the trigger.  How do you do this?  Turn the switch off as fast as you can.  BLAM.  Magnetic field collapses about both Input conductors and OUPUT conductors.  The output conductors did not of course hamper the input spring compression  (unlike most transformers) they were not connected to any apparent load when the springs were compressed.  So what we have is a magnetic field collapsing around two circuits.  The compressing circuit which will of course respond with energy in less than energy out due to circuit losses associated with current flow.  The second circuit maybe over the top.  In the spring analogy we compress the spring.  Place a ball in it's recoil path.  Launch ball and move spring and compressing object (hand?) back to start position.  Primary current and secondary current can oscillate in rlc circuits and damp same either voltage from the cap-current in the l-heat and light off the r.
   This microwave modification sucks.  I used a flyback transformer powered by an old tv chassis last time.  Less engneering.  I have always adhered to my belief that OU effects are due to electron kinetic energy.  Maybe they aren't moving but MIT guys say they are moving on some atoms at 1/6 the speed of light.  Even if it take x number of joules to set them free as they slow down you get your ionizing input plus back.