Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[verpies]

Well since the diodes don't switch themselves...

But they do!
See here.

[verpies]

DYNATRON FREE ENERGY ....
VIDEO....
www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=IlI_d8PhtqI

Those are STRONG arcs (sparks) !
...but is it a self-runner (samozapitka) ?

[wattsup]

@all

While I do some more tests there is something that I would like to clarify.

Let's talk about amps and why this is troubling my EE logic somewhat. Let's consider the 2004 device. With five 220vac bulbs at a good 100 watts a piece. At 200 volts, all you need is 0.5 amp each or 2.5 amps total to light those bulbs. Maybe 5 amps if the bulbs were 200 watts each. I know the output voltage required is not negotiable if you want the bulb brightness, but why the hell did they measure 24 amps on that output wire to those same bulbs. This means 24 amps was passing by that ammeter. How can 24 amps be consumed by those 5 light bulbs? For me, it does not make any sense at all. We should have seen only 2.5 or 5 amps max regardless of how much power the device is outputting? That is troubling me. That 24 or 26 amp reading was there in all three bulb lightings so including the 3rd lighting with the transformer loop back, hence increasing output draw but that output amp reading did not change? There is a big clue in this, but I can't figure it out yet.

The only other explanation is that those bulbs were 1000 watts each. Nahhhh. Can't be. 5000 watts of lighting that close up would have rendered everyone there blind for week.

It's as if the bulbs were not the only load or the output was being recirculated 10 times through the load but it's hard to explain. It is like the load is just a conductor that happens to have high resistance but not higher then the real load that is elsewhere in the system. What the hell.

@verpies

Yep, nice sparks all right.

wattsup

[yfree]

...
I know the output voltage required is not negotiable if you want the bulb brightness, but why the hell did they measure 24 amps on that output wire to those same bulbs. This means 24 amps was passing by that ammeter. How can 24 amps be consumed by those 5 light bulbs? For me, it does not make any sense at all. We should have seen only 2.5 or 5 amps max regardless of how much power the device is outputting? That is troubling me. That 24 or 26 amp reading was there in all three bulb lightings so including the 3rd lighting with the transformer loop back, hence increasing output draw but that output amp reading did not change? There is a big clue in this, but I can't figure it out yet.
...

The bulbs are not powered by 220 V AC. They are pulsed. The pulses are high voltage of unknown frequency (possibly 100 Hz). The ammeter does not function properly under these circumstances, hence the high amps reading. The input to the device is 220 V AC, therefore the input current measurements are correct.

[xenomorphlabs]

The bulbs are not powered by 220 V AC. They are pulsed. The pulses are high voltage of unknown frequency (possibly 100 Hz). The ammeter does not function properly under these circumstances, hence the high amps reading. The input to the device is 220 V AC, therefore the input current measurements are correct.

Since the device is self-looped, the problem arises to make sure the input gets 220V AC back out of itself.
So i would say this requirement strongly points to the fact that output IS already 220V AC feeding back to the input, otherwise he could not simply unhook the 220V AC inverter and let it run by itself.
There would have to be an additional inverter (with input sensing) in the green box then, if the lamps run on anything other than 220V AC.
In his patent you see the rails also directly feeding back.
Ampmeters under interference usually jump all over the place where the one in the green box video is relatively stable.
The voltmeter measurement AT one of those lamps does however jump all over the place even at one point out of scale.
It is peculiar that the voltmeter measurement right at the coil shows halfways stable values. Could be that TK had shaky hands though and didn't connect the probes tightly enough to the cable, who knows.
This points to different conditions in different parts of the load circuit.