Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 158 Guests are viewing this topic.

Magluvin

Quote from: TEKTRON on December 06, 2012, 09:42:04 PM
Works fine. UNZIP will not open, Download Extract Now. http://extractnow.com/

Hey Tek

That site download is not safe really. During the install it asks if you want to add a tool bar(forget the name) and I checked to not install the tool bar, but it did anyways and hijacked my fire fox. 

If when you are at the point in the installation where it asks yes or no, there seems to be a disclaimer just above the 'next' button that cannot be fully read. On purpose of course, but I guess they get away with it .

Hijacked my home page, didnt allow changing it. Other stuff as well.

Be careful with that one.

Mags


wattsup

@Сергей В.

I tried that circuit to run a flyback and works well but provides no variable control so for me it is a waste of time.

About circuit, I am still doing tests and have more questions. hehehe

@all1

From what I can see, in the GB demo, those 5 x 1000 watt bulbs were never at 5000 watts illumination. I'd say 1/3rd. 5000 watts of light would be blinding bright even for a lumens compensating camera. So before i continue my investigations I need to ask you guys what you think.

The image below is taken from the GB video being their first lighting of the bulbs.

Then see this youtube of a 1000 watts bulb being lit and tell me if you agree if 5 of these were lit at full power, would you be able to see through those lights, all the guys in the background holding up the components. Let me know what you think either here or by PM.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNyIAvKmGrs

@all2

Since TK did all this with only one "ground" wire, for me there in lies the main focus of the TK secret and there is really only a few more questions left to answer. One set of questions....

A) Is it easier to use an AC Hot and simulate an AC Neutral, or,
B) Is it easier to simulate an AC Hot and use an AC Neutral.

Either of these would be a great advancement.

Well, the 6.4 vac Hot answers this question for us and says it is easier to have an AC hot and simulate the neutral. So TK must have found a way to produce an isolated neutral that the AC hot can accept.  Also, we do not know what amperage is on that line and we also don't know if the frequency is at 60Hz. Some say that if the frequency was high the volt reading would not be accurate. So I did a quick test as follows.

I took my Frequency Generator (FG) positive and put it to my volt meter negative and the volt meter positive again to my ground rod. I set it at sine wave 60hz - 50% Duty and adjusted the FG amplitude to get a 6.4 vac reading on the volt meter. I then increased the frequency and here are the voltage readings.

60 Hz - 6.40 vac
121 Hz - 6.37 vac
180 Hz - 6.38 vac
240 Hz - 6.37 vac
400 Hz - 6.37 vac
1000 Hz - 6.37 vac
2 kHz - 6.39 vac
2.57 kHz - 6.40 vac
5 kHz - 6.40 vac
10 kHz - 6.40 vac
20 kHz - 6.36 vac
30 kHz - 6.30 vac
40 kHz - 6.25 vac
50 kHz - 6.21 vac
60 kHz - 6.17 vac
70 kHz - 6.10 vac
80 kHz - 6.10 vac
90 kHz - 6.12 vac
100 kHz - 6.21 vac
104 kHz - 6.29 vac
110 kHz - 6.38 vac
112 Khz - 6.41 vac
119 kHz - 6.48 vac
130 kHz - 6.54 vac
140 kHz - 6.57 vac
149 kHz - 6.47 vac
155 kHz - 6.20 vac
160 kHz - 5.64 vac
170 kHz - 1.32 vac
180 kHz - 1.17 vac
190 Khz - 0.966 vac
200 kHz - 0.775 vac

Go any higher and you're in the mV range.

I think you get the point here is that the voltage measurement accuracy can still occur at the higher frequencies so yes the black vested guy measured 6.4 vac, but it could have been at 60 Hz or 110 kHz and we would not know it. One wire transmission has always worked better at higher frequencies. Higher frequency feed means more peaks to chew on if you are interested in harvesting the peaks, more then if you had the same peaks at 60Hz.

wattsup


elementSix


elementSix

I don't know who posted the original video of wave forms from old AT&T archives, but this has it in it and is very informative on waves, oscillations, impedance ect.  if you don't know much on the subject you should watch it for sure..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DovunOxlY1k

I posted a newbie question a few days ago and I know that not many on this forum do experiments anymore if at all but I had a question about transference I observed when I used the single power wire off of a MOT.  I hooked just the single power wire that has a good sting to it when I touch the spark that comes off of it and I took that and hooked it up to a pancake coil that I used speaker wire to make.  When it came out on the outside wires, the one it was hooked to had little to no energy coming out of it and the unused wire had a much larger amount of energy coming from it and it would jump a lot farther from the wire to my finger than the lead wire did before I hooked it up to the pancake speaker wire coil.  Does anyone know why that is??? 

Would it be easier for TK to use light bulbs for his demonstrations because he uses single wire transmission or is there a better explanation for why he chooses to use lights instead of something else maybe what he uses can help point in the right direction.  The interference is probably why he doesn't use electronics that would go haywire near the device??

Hoppy

Quote from: wattsup on December 11, 2012, 12:58:23 AM
@Сергей В.

I tried that circuit to run a flyback and works well but provides no variable control so for me it is a waste of time.

About circuit, I am still doing tests and have more questions. hehehe

@all1

From what I can see, in the GB demo, those 5 x 1000 watt bulbs were never at 5000 watts illumination. I'd say 1/3rd. 5000 watts of light would be blinding bright even for a lumens compensating camera. So before i continue my investigations I need to ask you guys what you think.

The image below is taken from the GB video being their first lighting of the bulbs.

Then see this youtube of a 1000 watts bulb being lit and tell me if you agree if 5 of these were lit at full power, would you be able to see through those lights, all the guys in the background holding up the components. Let me know what you think either here or by PM.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNyIAvKmGrs

@all2

Since TK did all this with only one "ground" wire, for me there in lies the main focus of the TK secret and there is really only a few more questions left to answer. One set of questions....

A) Is it easier to use an AC Hot and simulate an AC Neutral, or,
B) Is it easier to simulate an AC Hot and use an AC Neutral.

Either of these would be a great advancement.


wattsup

Firstly, having studied all the videos, I would say fairly confidently that the lamps were nowhere near max brightness.

Secondly, it is far from clear that TK used only one wire in the 'green box' and 'transparent box' videos throughout the demo sessions. It is fairly clear that two wires were used for a part of the 'green box' demo - see my earlier post.