Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[verpies]

Hmmm ... I can see a fan, an inverter in a steel housing, a transformer, a knife, a pair of pliers all around next to the TK platform.

If those objects are randomly movable in proximity of the device after B shimming, then they will destroy the homogeneity of the magnetic field and the phase alignment of nuclear precession with it.
Perturbing ferromagnetic objects will not destroy the precession itself.

A phase incoherent NMR will still occur if the sample/gain medium is excited with dense comb of frequencies (e.g. nanopulses) in an inhomogeneous magnetic field.

[verpies]

Once you realize the real modus, all the events come into focus and start making sense.

That would also mean that all of the demobuyers (including Wesley) were incompetent, as the did not isolate the DUT's I/O paths with due diligence.

[yfree]

..
And that's »so simple you will laugh« as Kapanadze says?

...

This "so simple you will laugh" statement was repeated here many times.
It means not much really.
One may ask: simple in what aspect?  Is this a simple idea, simple construction or simple operation?
Is this statement to be taken literally? It does not seem so. Not when one looks at the 2004 video. There are quite a few parts visible there and some parts are hidden.
His patents are obviously written such as to reveal as little as possible. There are however two elements in the patents that reveal quite a lot. There is a frequency generator and a "transformer". No further details about these two elements are given, but that is where the secret dwells. The rest is of secondary importance. The frequency generator, pulsed or frequency modulated, excites the NMR in the "transformer" via the primary winding. This stimulates the "chain reactions" in the "transformer" producing pulses of current. The energy from these pulses is coupled by the secondary winding.
What can be simpler than this (see below)?
The idea is simple. The construction is not too complicated. The physics behind the operation of this device may not be simple, but this is another story.
The "transformer" itself, may have various shapes, but the main point is that it has to provide conditions for stimulated "chain reactions".

[verpies]

Beautifully distinguished!.  I could not have written it better myself.
You forgot to add that this simple schematic diagram is from McFreey's paper.

[yfree]

Beautifully distinguished!.  I could not have written it better myself.
You forgot to add that this simple schematic diagram is from McFreey's paper.

Thank you for this reminder.
I quoted McFreey's paper so many times that this time I forgot.
Or maybe I thought, it was obvious  .
By the way, there is a newer version of McFreey's paper in the PJKBook.