Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 180 Guests are viewing this topic.

forest

Farmhand

I think you see the glass half empty while I see it half full and we would never agree.

The secret to OU lies in fact that there is always equal and opposite reaction to any action, and sometimes this reaction may cause the chain reaction or converting hidden potential energy into usable one.

Here is your mistake you probably want everybody to follow : you set up a closed system without interations with envinronment  and then you adds a clausule that every system taking energy from converting mass into energy is not OU by definition (because you assume only closed circuits are permitted).

In case of building demolition by small precise placed explosive materials - hidden potential energy of gravitation is what causes chain reaction of collapsing from the small initial kick.....

By your definition surely there is no OU.  See it that way and you will never find it...

Farmhand

Thanks  Khwartz, But I am very much a learner and always will be.  :) Although I am trying to make good measurements
and use correct terms I am still quite prone to mistakes and do appreciated being corrected, it would be difficult to learn if I can't accept corrections.
I don't have much money and my equipment is a big investment so I must take it slow and learn how not to ruin the expensive equipment.
One reason why I made the small Tesla coils so tame ie, 10 primary turns. This allows me to scope it without too much chance of damage.
I'm interested to move to using a Valve (vacuum tube) to run my larger coils in continuous wave mode so the small mosfet circuit was so I could learn some stuff about
feedback oscillators mainly, The road is long and I'm too old to hurry.  ;D

While I'm waiting for LED's i'm thinking I will setup the two identical transformers as twin transmitters each with it's own oscillator but both connected by the secondary bottoms to
a big ground plane. I hope this will produce "beats", I will try first just powering one and letting the other oscillate on its own, but I think if both were powered it could be better.
I should be able to tune them so that I can change the frequency of the "Beat" I want it to be a low frequency beat less than 5 kHz I hope.

Then I'll see what happens as far as making ground disturbances goes and other experiments.

To all, rest assured if by some chance I find something that is or even looks like OU (anomalous energy) or I think could lead to OU I will share it to the best of my ability.
I couldn't afford a patent even if I had something and wanted to patent it so I'm all open source. Money is not nutritious to eat and is toxic to burn for heat, at any time it could be just paper or plastic.

Cheers

DreamThinkBuild

Hi Forest,

I like that train of thought, a chain reaction. The chain reaction has to be self resettable with minimal loss though, like dominoes on rubber bands. One input to displace many outputs, a single output is not more than the input but multiple together can they accumulatively exceed the input?

A single solar cell will not charge a car battery but thirty six in series accumulatively will. The single input is still the same on all cells. Although in this example it will never exceed the input of the sun. :)

Farmhand

Quote from: forest on December 23, 2012, 01:03:05 PM
Farmhand

I think you see the glass half empty while I see it half full and we would never agree.

The secret to OU lies in fact that there is always equal and opposite reaction to any action, and sometimes this reaction may cause the chain reaction or converting hidden potential energy into usable one.

Here is your mistake you probably want everybody to follow : you set up a closed system without interations with envinronment  and then you adds a clausule that every system taking energy from converting mass into energy is not OU by definition (because you assume only closed circuits are permitted).

In case of building demolition by small precise placed explosive materials - hidden potential energy of gravitation is what causes chain reaction of collapsing from the small initial kick.....

By your definition surely there is no OU.  See it that way and you will never find it...

The energy from gravity for the fall of the building was overcome with work when the building was built. It took energy to raise the building.
You also forget the cleanup from an implosion and the waste. IF a building is deconstructed there is not as much waste stuff is reusable
as well the clean up occurs in part while the deconstruction is under way.

Each way has it's advantage. The implosion way is much better for quick result. The deconstruction is in fact not even viable for some larger buildings.

You're forgetting the work it took to raise the building.

There is no such thing as a closed system. Ie the Tesla coil is connected to the ground and the atmosphere, it has an inductive field over a meter around it. Nothing closed about that. Nothing closed about a solar system or wind either neither of those are OU in my opinion they are collectors of energy. Same as a radiant energy collector.

Energy cannot be manufactured, saying it could be would be like saying one could add something to the Universe. That cannot be done.

My definition of OU for energy is the only one I see that is logically correct. and that is C.O.P. over 1, over unity = over one.

In other words if the useful intended work done in joules/energy is more than the energy supplied to make it happen. To calculate a C.O.P. there must be an input so
solar and wind don't qualify they are just 100 % free energy devices, In my opinion. I've got nothing against others calling them infinite C.O.P..

Cheers

P.S. Gravity is a two way street, before you can utilize it you must overcome it. You can't drop a ball from one meter unless you lift it against gravity for 1 meter.

..

ramset

Forest
If you ever want to get a feel for OU and How far away we are from the "power" at any moment.
take a flight to Florida USA and  "grab" a thunderstorm [they come along every little bit pretty much year round ].
You fellows in parts of the World Void of this "power Show" need to Grab a flight  and "experience it first hand".
Then tell yourself there's no other way to Harvest this beast that will travel 40 miles out of the clear blue sky to "fix"or Balance things
Right next to where you stand............
Thx
Chet

Whats for yah ne're go bye yah
Thanks Grandma