Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[Zeitmaschine]

At present I am testing the circuit with DC and using a single AA battery to pulse the drive coil. No matter which polarity is applied the Thyristor latches.

Connecting a SCR is difficult stuff.

The Back EMF of the Ferrite ring should be considered. One polarity of the battery latches the thyristor via the Forward EMF and the other polarity of the battery latches it via the Back EMF, I presume. In theory a suppression diode between gate and cathode could help, although there are none in the diagram.

Regards

[bass]

fake
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0LdGSO50l0

[Grumage]

Connecting a SCR is difficult stuff.

The Back EMF of the Ferrite ring should be considered. One polarity of the battery latches the thyristor via the Forward EMF and the other polarity of the battery latches it via the Back EMF, I presume. In theory a suppression diode between gate and cathode could help, although there are none in the diagram.

Regards

Hello Zeitmaschine,

Just had another look at your refurbished schematic, there is an error I'm afraid. Look closely at the positioning of VS1 and VS2 you have blocked  the negative return for the initial charging of C1 Via S3. See attached.

I have been playing around all day with My SCR's and am now able to have them sitting with an AC supply and no spurios triggering, the trick will now be how to trigger the gates!!

Regards Grum.

[Hel]

The Atmospheric energy collection patent

Is no one interested in the Atmospheric energy collection patent posted ? Because if not I'll keep my work to myself, I don't think it belongs in this thread and
I'm not making a thread to be the only one posting in it. Either way suit's me fine, with no thread my work is less because I don't need to post.
And the source of energy is identified so .......... According to most it cannot be OU and so should not warrant a thread anyway.

Cheers

Dear Farmhand, here is Elena from the Testatika yahoo group.
Yes, I would be one of those people very interested in discussing such things.
Just, I fear this is not the proper thread for that - even if I realized that the idea is emerging
here that the Kapanadze device could actually harvest air electricity. I follow this thread very
seldom though. I have to admit, I am not sure that Kapanadze device is not a hoax, but this
is just my opinion and I could be wrong. While I think we have too many arguments and
proofs that the Testatika is real, and explicit declarations and proofs that it actually harvests
air electricity. You simply can't imagine how many patents we discussed and analized there,
about devices to collect air electricity ! My invitation to join the Testatika group applies,
I'm one of the admins there, and you will find motivated people to discuss such topics
contstructively. Or if you prefer, you could think to insert this discussion here on Overunity:
http://www.overunity.com/2223/source-of-energy-testatika/msg354978/#new
it's an old opened thread and I know at least one people partecipating there who is also
active on the yahoo group. I personally don't feel to fork this thread further, even because
I notice it has become a mess of thousands and more messages, different views and theories...
see you what you prefer.
/&

[Farmhand]

Dear Farmhand, here is Elena from the Testatika yahoo group.
Yes, I would be one of those people very interested in discussing such things.
Just, I fear this is not the proper thread for that - even if I realized that the idea is emerging
here that the Kapanadze device could actually harvest air electricity. I follow this thread very
seldom though. I have to admit, I am not sure that Kapanadze device is not a hoax, but this
is just my opinion and I could be wrong. While I think we have too many arguments and
proofs that the Testatika is real, and explicit declarations and proofs that it actually harvests
air electricity. You simply can't imagine how many patents we discussed and analized there,
about devices to collect air electricity ! My invitation to join the Testatika group applies,
I'm one of the admins there, and you will find motivated people to discuss such topics
contstructively. Or if you prefer, you could think to insert this discussion here on Overunity:
http://www.overunity.com/2223/source-of-energy-testatika/msg354978/#new
it's an old opened thread and I know at least one people partecipating there who is also
active on the yahoo group. I personally don't feel to fork this thread further, even because
I notice it has become a mess of thousands and more messages, different views and theories...
see you what you prefer.
/&

Thanks for the reply Hel, I want to setup a simple experiment ( not so simple really) as a kind of proof of concept
I'm always interested to share with people of like thinking and genuine motives. I like to study patents even
though I don't always understand them fully. Thanks for the reply and support. I'll be in touch.
I've been thinking on this for a few days now and I think I've visualized how it could work but I want to
have some indication result to verify that things will happen the way I think, even though the principal, or part of it
is already proven I think. To use an analogy the passive effect to the enhanced effect might look like the difference between
a tall ship in favorable winds with all sails down as compared to a tall ship in favorable winds under full sail and trimmed to
make best use of said winds. Even with the sails down a ship will be affected slightly by the winds, although just putting up the sails
won't always make best use of them. As with yacht racing two different crews with the same equipment can have very different results
even though they are fully aware of the forces involved. If there is a sound principal there are known forces to work with.

I'll post any initial results or comments on the other thread here for now.

Best regards.